Browser CDP MCP Server
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Browser CDP MCP Servertake a screenshot of the current page and save it as a PNG"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Browser CDP MCP Server
A minimal MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that provides direct access to the Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP) for maximum flexibility browser control.
Features
Raw CDP Access: Call any Chrome DevTools Protocol method directly via
cdp_sendScreenshot Capture: Take screenshots in PNG or JPEG format
URL Retrieval: Get the current page URL
Browser Management: Launch and close browser instances
Related MCP server: Chrome DevTools MCP
Installation
npm installUsage
npm startThe server communicates over stdio using the MCP protocol.
Tools
cdp_send
Execute any CDP method. Reference: https://chromedevtools.github.io/devtools-protocol/
Parameters:
method(string): CDP method name (e.g.,Page.navigate,DOM.getDocument,Runtime.evaluate)params(object, optional): Parameters for the CDP method
Example:
{
"method": "Page.navigate",
"params": { "url": "https://example.com" }
}screenshot
Capture a screenshot of the current page.
Parameters:
format(string, optional):"png"or"jpeg"(default:"png")fullPage(boolean, optional): Capture full scrollable page (default:false)
get_url
Returns the current page URL.
close_browser
Closes the browser instance and cleans up resources.
MCP Configuration
Add to your MCP client configuration:
claude mcp add-json browser '{
"type": "stdio",
"command": "node",
"args": ["path/to/browser-tool/server.js"]
}' --scope userSkill Integration
Add the browser skill to claude:
cp .path/to/browser-tool/.claude/skills/browser.md ~/.claude/skills/browser.mdDependencies
@modelcontextprotocol/sdk- MCP SDK for server implementationplaywright- Browser automationzod- Schema validation
License
MIT
Available Tools
4 toolscdp_sendD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| method | Yes | CDP method (e.g., 'Page.navigate', 'DOM.getDocument', 'Runtime.evaluate') | |
| params | No | Parameters object for the CDP method |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
close_browserD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_urlD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
screenshotD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| format | No | Image format | |
| fullPage | No | Capture full scrollable page |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
4 tool updates
- First observed
cdp_send - First observed
close_browser - First observed
get_url - First observed
screenshot
TDQS
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: cdp_send appears to send commands to the Chrome DevTools Protocol, close_browser terminates the browser session, get_url retrieves the current URL, and screenshot captures a visual snapshot. There is no overlap in functionality between these tools.
The naming is mixed: cdp_send uses a prefix-based convention, while close_browser, get_url, and screenshot follow a verb_noun pattern. This inconsistency reduces predictability, but all names are still readable and descriptive of their functions.
With only 4 tools, the set feels thin for a browser automation server, lacking common operations like navigation, clicking, or input handling. However, the tools cover basic session management and inspection, making it borderline appropriate for minimal use cases.
The toolset is severely incomplete for browser automation: it lacks essential actions like navigate, click, type, or evaluate JavaScript, and there is no coverage for interacting with page elements or handling events. This will cause significant agent failures in typical browsing tasks.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Automate cloud Chrome—navigate, click, type, screenshot, run code, record screen video
Hosted real Google Chrome MCP with per-user persistent state. Navigate, click, type, screenshot.
Hosted browser for AI agents: screenshots, post-JS DOM, console, WCAG. No install, no API key.
61Stealth web automation for AI agents. Login, signup, navigate, screenshot.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants to control and inspect a live Chrome browser through DevTools for automated testing, performance analysis, debugging, and web scraping. Provides reliable browser automation using Puppeteer with comprehensive DevTools access.3,288,1653Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants to control and inspect a live Chrome browser for automation, debugging, performance analysis, network monitoring, and DOM interaction through Chrome DevTools Protocol.3,288,165Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables direct browser control via Chrome DevTools Protocol, supporting navigation, interaction, content extraction, and screenshots through a single MCP tool.1346MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables reading browser DevTools data (tabs, console errors, network requests, screenshots, DOM, CSS, JS execution) via Chrome DevTools Protocol.5,218MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Myestery/browser-cdp-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server