Sequential Thinking MCP Server
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Sequential Thinking MCP ServerBreak down the problem of planning a cross-country road trip into logical steps."
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Sequential Thinking MCP Server
This repository contains a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides a sequentialthinking tool. The tool facilitates dynamic and reflective problem-solving through a chain of thoughts, allowing AI agents to break down complex problems, revise past thoughts, and explore branches of logic before arriving at a conclusion.
This project is configured to run in two modes:
Stdio: Standard MCP transport for local IDE and CLI integrations.
Server-Sent Events (SSE): Deployed as a secure, remote HTTP gateway on Google Cloud Run.
Local Development
Install dependencies and build the TypeScript code:
npm install
npm run buildTo run the Stdio server locally:
node dist/index.jsRelated MCP server: Enhanced Sequential Thinking MCP Server
Cloud Run Deployment (SSE Gateway)
This project can be easily cloned and deployed to any Google Cloud account or project. This allows anyone to host their own secure, remote Sequential Thinking MCP server.
Prerequisites
Install the Google Cloud CLI (
gcloud).Authenticate with your Google account:
gcloud auth loginSet your active Google Cloud Project (ensure billing is enabled):
gcloud config set project YOUR_PROJECT_IDEnable the required APIs for your project:
gcloud services enable run.googleapis.com cloudbuild.googleapis.com
Deploying
Once authenticated, you can deploy the service using the provided Makefile:
make deployWhat this does:
Packages the application and builds a Docker container using the provided
Dockerfile.Generates a secure, random
MCP_API_KEY(if one is not already provided).Deploys the container to Google Cloud Run (default region:
us-central1).Outputs the Service URL and your secure API key.
Client Configuration
Once deployed, you can configure your MCP client (Cursor, Hermes, Antigravity, Claude Desktop, etc.) to connect to the SSE gateway.
Provide your client with:
URL:
<YOUR_CLOUD_RUN_URL>/sseHeaders:
Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_MCP_API_KEY>
Available Tools
1 toolsequentialthinkingSequential ThinkingARead-onlyIdempotent
A detailed tool for dynamic and reflective problem-solving through thoughts. This tool helps analyze problems through a flexible thinking process that can adapt and evolve. Each thought can build on, question, or revise previous insights as understanding deepens.
When to use this tool:
Breaking down complex problems into steps
Planning and design with room for revision
Analysis that might need course correction
Problems where the full scope might not be clear initially
Problems that require a multi-step solution
Tasks that need to maintain context over multiple steps
Situations where irrelevant information needs to be filtered out
Key features:
You can adjust total_thoughts up or down as you progress
You can question or revise previous thoughts
You can add more thoughts even after reaching what seemed like the end
You can express uncertainty and explore alternative approaches
Not every thought needs to build linearly - you can branch or backtrack
Generates a solution hypothesis
Verifies the hypothesis based on the Chain of Thought steps
Repeats the process until satisfied
Provides a correct answer
Parameters explained:
thought: Your current thinking step, which can include:
Regular analytical steps
Revisions of previous thoughts
Questions about previous decisions
Realizations about needing more analysis
Changes in approach
Hypothesis generation
Hypothesis verification
nextThoughtNeeded: True if you need more thinking, even if at what seemed like the end
thoughtNumber: Current number in sequence (can go beyond initial total if needed)
totalThoughts: Current estimate of thoughts needed (can be adjusted up/down)
isRevision: A boolean indicating if this thought revises previous thinking
revisesThought: If is_revision is true, which thought number is being reconsidered
branchFromThought: If branching, which thought number is the branching point
branchId: Identifier for the current branch (if any)
needsMoreThoughts: If reaching end but realizing more thoughts needed
You should:
Start with an initial estimate of needed thoughts, but be ready to adjust
Feel free to question or revise previous thoughts
Don't hesitate to add more thoughts if needed, even at the "end"
Express uncertainty when present
Mark thoughts that revise previous thinking or branch into new paths
Ignore information that is irrelevant to the current step
Generate a solution hypothesis when appropriate
Verify the hypothesis based on the Chain of Thought steps
Repeat the process until satisfied with the solution
Provide a single, ideally correct answer as the final output
Only set nextThoughtNeeded to false when truly done and a satisfactory answer is reached
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| thought | Yes | Your current thinking step | |
| branchId | No | Branch identifier | |
| isRevision | No | Whether this revises previous thinking | |
| thoughtNumber | Yes | Current thought number (numeric value, e.g., 1, 2, 3) | |
| totalThoughts | Yes | Estimated total thoughts needed (numeric value, e.g., 5, 10) | |
| revisesThought | No | Which thought is being reconsidered | |
| branchFromThought | No | Branching point thought number | |
| needsMoreThoughts | No | If more thoughts are needed | |
| nextThoughtNeeded | No | Whether another thought step is needed |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| branches | Yes | |
| thoughtNumber | Yes | |
| totalThoughts | Yes | |
| nextThoughtNeeded | Yes | |
| thoughtHistoryLength | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations indicate read-only and idempotent behavior. The description adds valuable behavioral traits: iterative reasoning, hypothesis generation and verification, ability to revise and branch, and handling uncertainty. This goes beyond annotations without contradicting them.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured with clear sections and front-loaded purpose, but it is verbose. Some repetitions (e.g., 'Generate a solution hypothesis' appears twice) and the numbered list of steps adds length. Could be tightened without losing substance.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's cognitive nature, 9 parameters (3 required), full schema coverage, and an output schema, the description comprehensively covers usage contexts, parameter explanations, key features, and step-by-step instructions. It leaves no critical gaps for an AI agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, and the description expands on each parameter in the 'Parameters explained' section, providing examples and context (e.g., 'thought' can include revisions, questions, etc.). This adds meaningful guidance beyond the schema descriptions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it's a tool for 'dynamic and reflective problem-solving through thoughts' with a specific verb 'analyze' and resource 'thoughts'. It outlines a flexible thinking process with building, questioning, and revision capabilities. Since there are no sibling tools, differentiation is not needed.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description includes a 'When to use this tool' section with explicit contexts (e.g., breaking down complex problems, planning with room for revision, analysis needing course correction). It does not explicitly state when not to use it, but the contexts are clear and no alternatives exist, so it meets a high standard.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
v0.6.2- First observed
sequentialthinking
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clear and distinct.
With a single tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect. The name 'sequentialthinking' is descriptive and follows a clear pattern.
A single tool is borderline for a server; while the tool is comprehensive, the server's scope would typically benefit from multiple focused tools.
The tool covers the full sequential thinking process with parameters for revision, branching, and verification, leaving no obvious gaps for its stated purpose.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
AI Reasoning Cache & Consensus Layer with 11 MCP tools via Streamable HTTP.
Google-OAuth-gated LLM gateway: verify a Google ID token, then run a Gemini (Vertex AI) completion f
Source-checked CLI guides and model-aware planning for Claude Code, Codex, and Grok Build.
16 AI-native tools with dual SSE + streamable-http transport. Free tier available.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityNot gradedmaintenanceProvides structured sequential thinking capabilities for AI assistants to break down complex problems into manageable steps, revise thoughts, and explore alternative reasoning paths.29-
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables structured problem-solving through sequential thinking stages with persistent storage and analysis. Helps break down complex problems into manageable cognitive steps while tracking progress and generating summaries of the entire thought process.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceIntegrates Google's Gemini API to provide sequential analytical thinking and problem-solving capabilities with meta-commentary, confidence levels, branching thoughts, and session persistence for complex problems.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides a tool for dynamic and reflective problem-solving through structured sequential thinking, and automatically stores logs to the Recall network for on-chain persistence.17-
Appeared in Searches
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Kemosabe0x/sequential-thinking-mcp-sse'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server