jungle-grid-mcp-server
OfficialThe Jungle Grid MCP Server is a gateway that lets AI agents submit, monitor, and manage GPU workloads on Jungle Grid's cloud infrastructure. Key capabilities include:
Estimate a job (
estimate_job) — Get a cost and GPU tier estimate before committing, with options to compare optimization strategies (cost, speed, balanced).Submit a job (
submit_job) — Launch a GPU workload asynchronously using a Docker image and command, with configuration options for GPU type/class, region, environment variables, disk size, latency/cost priority, and Hugging Face credentials.Get job status (
get_job) — Retrieve the current status and full details of a specific job; terminal states arecompleted,failed, andcancelled.List jobs (
list_jobs) — Retrieve a paginated list of recent jobs, optionally filtered by status.Cancel a job (
cancel_job) — Cancel a pending, queued, or running job with an optional reason.Get job logs (
get_job_logs) — Retrieve stdout/stderr output for a completed or running job.Stream job logs (
stream_job_logs) — Stream live log output in real-time, blocking until the job reaches a terminal state or a timeout (up to 10 minutes).List job artifacts (
list_job_artifacts) — List output artifacts uploaded from/workspace/artifactsfor managed jobs.Get artifact download URL (
get_artifact_download_url) — Generate a temporary signed download URL for a specific job artifact.
Jungle Grid MCP Server
Jungle Grid MCP lets MCP-aware agents estimate, submit, monitor, cancel, and retrieve artifacts from Jungle Grid workloads. It supports local stdio clients and hosted Streamable HTTP deployments that forward tool calls to the Jungle Grid API.
Use it for asynchronous AI workload execution, batch processing, training, fine-tuning, uploaded file or script backed jobs, lifecycle diagnostics, workload logs, and managed output artifacts.
Installation
Requirements:
Node.js 18 or newer
A Jungle Grid API key for local stdio, or an OAuth bearer token for hosted HTTP
API scopes that match the tools you want to call
Run the local stdio server with npx:
JUNGLE_GRID_API_KEY=jg_placeholder npx -y @jungle-grid/mcpInstall globally if you prefer a stable executable:
npm install -g @jungle-grid/mcp
junglegrid-mcpRelated MCP server: clausius
Configuration
Local stdio uses environment variables:
Variable | Required | Purpose |
| Yes for local stdio | Bearer token forwarded to the Jungle Grid API. |
| No | API base URL. Defaults to |
| No | Legacy API base URL alias, also accepted. |
Hosted HTTP gateway deployments also support:
Variable | Required | Purpose |
| No | Starts Streamable HTTP instead of stdio. |
| No | HTTP port. Defaults to |
| No | Service token used for OAuth introspection or fallback API calls. |
| No | OAuth issuer. Defaults to |
| No | Protected resource URL. Defaults to |
| No | OAuth protected-resource metadata URL. |
| No | Enables |
Never commit API keys, OAuth tokens, signed upload URLs, signed artifact URLs, or callback secrets.
Connection Modes
Local stdio
Local clients launch the package and communicate over stdio.
{
"mcpServers": {
"junglegrid": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@jungle-grid/mcp"],
"env": {
"JUNGLE_GRID_API_KEY": "jg_placeholder"
}
}
}
}Claude Desktop
Add the same mcpServers block to claude_desktop_config.json, then fully quit and reopen Claude Desktop.
macOS:
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.jsonWindows:
%APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.jsonCursor
For project config, avoid checked-in secrets. Put the key in the environment used to launch Cursor:
{
"mcpServers": {
"junglegrid": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@jungle-grid/mcp"]
}
}
}For a local uncommitted Cursor config:
{
"mcpServers": {
"junglegrid": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@jungle-grid/mcp"],
"env": {
"JUNGLE_GRID_API_KEY": "jg_placeholder",
"JUNGLEGRID_API_BASE": "https://api.junglegrid.dev"
}
}
}
}Hosted HTTP
The HTTP server exposes:
GET /healthzGET /.well-known/oauth-protected-resourcePOST /mcp
Start it locally:
MCP_TRANSPORT=http PORT=3000 JUNGLEGRID_INTERNAL_SERVICE_TOKEN=service_token_placeholder npm startHosted MCP clients must send Authorization: Bearer <oauth_access_token> to POST /mcp. The server introspects tokens at /oauth/introspect on the configured API base and requires tool-specific scopes.
Minimal Working Example
Ask your MCP client to call the tools in this order:
{
"tool": "estimate_job",
"arguments": {
"workload_type": "batch",
"image": "python:3.11-slim",
"command": ["python", "-c", "print('hello from Jungle Grid')"],
"routing_mode": "balanced"
}
}If the estimate is acceptable, submit the job:
{
"tool": "submit_job",
"arguments": {
"name": "mcp-hello",
"workload_type": "batch",
"image": "python:3.11-slim",
"command": ["python", "-c", "print('hello from Jungle Grid')"],
"expected_artifacts": ["/workspace/artifacts/output.txt"]
}
}Use the returned job_id with get_job, get_job_events, get_job_logs, list_artifacts, and get_artifact.
MCP Tools
The current tool registry exposes these exact tool names:
Tool | Purpose | Required parameters | Optional parameters |
| Estimate routing, capacity source, and expected cost without creating work. |
|
|
| Submit a workload. This may start compute and incur usage charges. |
|
|
| Create a signed upload slot for an input file or script. |
|
|
| List uploaded inputs and scripts for the authenticated account. | none | none |
| List recent jobs. | none |
|
| Read job status, phase, scheduling, billing, and artifact readiness. |
| none |
| Read lifecycle events for scheduling, provisioning, startup, failures, and cancellation. |
| none |
| Read persisted runtime and workload logs. |
|
|
| Request cancellation of a non-terminal job. |
|
|
| List managed output artifacts for a job. |
| none |
| Create temporary artifact download information. |
| none |
Accepted workload_type values are inference, training, fine_tuning, and batch. The MCP server forwards fine_tuning to the REST API as fine-tuning. Accepted routing_mode values are cost, speed, and balanced.
Tool Details
estimate_job
Returns classification, route status, capacity source, estimated cost range, availability, and screening details when returned by the API. An estimate is not a reservation and does not guarantee immediate startup.
Common errors: missing workload_type, invalid enum value, authentication failure, forbidden scope, invalid request, upstream API error.
{
"workload_type": "inference",
"model_size": 7,
"image": "pytorch/pytorch:2.4.0-cuda12.1-cudnn9-runtime",
"command": ["python", "infer.py"],
"routing_mode": "balanced",
"notes": "single model inference run"
}submit_job
Creates an asynchronous job. model_size is an optional size in GB used to select suitable GPU capacity and is forwarded as REST model_size_gb. command is preferably an array of strings. env must be an object with string values and is forwarded as REST environment. input_files and script_files accept arrays of { "input_id": "..." }; string IDs are normalized for compatibility. The current REST implementation supports one uploaded script reference.
Expected response includes job_id, status, queued_at or submitted_at, routing fields, input/script details, and artifact contract fields when returned by the API.
Common errors: missing name, image, or workload_type; invalid workload type; command or args too long; invalid environment values; missing or incomplete input IDs; insufficient funds; unavailable capacity; maintenance; authentication or scope failures.
{
"name": "transcribe-audio",
"workload_type": "inference",
"model_size": 7,
"image": "python:3.11-slim",
"command": ["python", "/workspace/scripts/transcribe.py", "/workspace/inputs/audio.ogg", "/workspace/artifacts/transcript.txt"],
"script_files": [{ "input_id": "inp_script123" }],
"input_files": [{ "input_id": "inp_audio123" }],
"expected_artifacts": ["/workspace/artifacts/transcript.txt"],
"routing_mode": "balanced",
"metadata": {
"request_id": "req_123"
}
}upload_job_input
Creates a signed upload slot. It does not upload file bytes by itself. Upload the bytes to upload.upload_url using upload.method, then complete the upload with upload.complete_url and the returned upload.token.
kind is an arbitrary string accepted by the API. Use input for normal input files and script for scripts by convention. Script uploads mount under /workspace/scripts/<filename>; input uploads mount under /workspace/inputs/<filename>.
Expected response:
{
"upload": {
"input_id": "inp_123",
"filename": "transcribe.py",
"method": "PUT",
"upload_url": "https://signed-upload.example",
"token": "upload_token",
"expires_at": "2026-06-11T12:15:00Z",
"complete_url": "https://api.junglegrid.dev/v1/job-inputs/inp_123/complete"
}
}Common errors: missing filename, invalid filename, file too large, upload storage unavailable, authentication or scope failure.
list_job_inputs
Returns uploaded inputs with input_id, filename, content_type, size_bytes, kind, status, ready, mount_path, and timestamps when available.
list_jobs
Returns jobs, limit, next_cursor, and has_more. limit is capped by the API. status is a free-form filter string passed to the API; do not assume the MCP schema restricts it to a fixed enum.
get_job
Returns the current job status and details. Status, execution phase, lifecycle events, runtime details, and workload logs are separate surfaces.
Important response fields include status, phase, execution_phase, status_message, status_reason, phase_started_at, phase_last_updated_at, wait_duration_seconds, delayed_start, delay_reason, scheduling, startup_diagnostics, provider, artifacts_ready, failure, input_files, script_file, and artifact_contract when present.
get_job_events
Returns lifecycle events before and during execution. Events may exist before workload logs begin. Events include IDs, types, phases, titles, messages, source, level, timestamps, sequence, and a generated timestamp.
Use events to diagnose queueing, route selection, scheduling, provider provisioning, input preparation, startup, retries, failures, and cancellation.
get_job_logs
Returns stored log entries with items, next_cursor, has_more, failure_highlight, and usage_hint when available. Entries include entry_id, source, category, stream, message, truncated, and created_at when returned by the API.
Logs can be empty while a job is queued, scheduling, provisioning, or preparing. Call get_job_events when logs are empty but the job is not terminal. This MCP tool fetches persisted logs; it does not provide true streaming.
cancel_job
Requests cancellation for a pending, queued, assigned, starting, or running job. Completed, failed, rejected, or already cancelled jobs return a conflict from the API.
Expected response includes job_id, status, and status_reason when returned by the API. Cancellation may trigger managed teardown, but do not assume immediate infrastructure shutdown.
list_artifacts
Returns managed artifacts for a job. Artifacts include artifact_id, job_id, filename, content_type, size_bytes, status, ready, and timestamps when returned by the API. Failed jobs may have no artifacts or partial artifacts.
get_artifact
Creates temporary download information for one artifact. The API returns artifact metadata, a signed URL, and expires_at. Treat the URL as a secret.
Common errors: artifact not found, artifact not ready, artifact storage unavailable, forbidden job, authentication failure.
Production Workflows
Simple Job
Estimate:
{
"workload_type": "batch",
"image": "python:3.11-slim",
"command": ["python", "-c", "from pathlib import Path; Path('/workspace/artifacts/output.txt').write_text('done')"],
"routing_mode": "balanced"
}Submit:
{
"name": "simple-artifact-job",
"workload_type": "batch",
"image": "python:3.11-slim",
"command": ["python", "-c", "from pathlib import Path; Path('/workspace/artifacts/output.txt').write_text('done')"],
"expected_artifacts": ["/workspace/artifacts/output.txt"],
"routing_mode": "balanced"
}Monitor:
{ "job_id": "job_123" }Call get_job, get_job_events, and get_job_logs with the same job_id until the status is terminal.
Retrieve:
{ "job_id": "job_123" }Call list_artifacts, then:
{
"job_id": "job_123",
"artifact_id": "art_123"
}File-Backed Job
Create upload slots:
{
"filename": "transcribe.py",
"content_type": "text/x-python",
"kind": "script"
}{
"filename": "audio.ogg",
"content_type": "audio/ogg",
"kind": "input"
}Upload each file to the returned signed
upload_url, then complete it:
curl -X PUT "$UPLOAD_URL" \
-H "Content-Type: text/x-python" \
--data-binary @transcribe.py
curl -X POST "$COMPLETE_URL" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $JUNGLE_GRID_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"token": "upload_token",
"filename": "transcribe.py",
"content_type": "text/x-python",
"size_bytes": 1234,
"etag": "optional-etag"
}'Submit with input IDs:
{
"name": "file-backed-transcription",
"workload_type": "inference",
"image": "python:3.11-slim",
"command": ["python", "/workspace/scripts/transcribe.py", "/workspace/inputs/audio.ogg", "/workspace/artifacts/transcript.txt"],
"script_files": [{ "input_id": "inp_script123" }],
"input_files": [{ "input_id": "inp_audio123" }],
"expected_artifacts": ["/workspace/artifacts/transcript.txt"]
}Monitor with
get_job_events,get_job, andget_job_logs.Retrieve
/workspace/artifacts/transcript.txtwithlist_artifactsandget_artifact.
Error Shape
REST MCP routes return an envelope:
{
"ok": false,
"error": {
"code": "INVALID_REQUEST",
"message": "name, image, and workload_type are required"
}
}The MCP server converts API errors into tool errors like:
submit_job failed: INVALID_REQUEST: name, image, and workload_type are requiredCommon API codes include UNAUTHORIZED, FORBIDDEN, INVALID_REQUEST, JOB_INPUT_NOT_FOUND, JOB_INPUT_NOT_READY, ARTIFACT_NOT_READY, NOT_FOUND, CONFLICT, INSUFFICIENT_FUNDS, MAINTENANCE_ACTIVE, and INTERNAL_ERROR.
Security
Keep API keys and OAuth tokens out of prompts, source control, browser bundles, logs, and issue trackers.
Prefer host secret stores or local-only MCP config files for
JUNGLE_GRID_API_KEY.Treat signed upload and artifact URLs as temporary bearer secrets.
Do not print environment variables that contain tokens from workload code.
Review
submit_jobandcancel_jobrequests before allowing an agent to execute them, because they can spend credits or stop active work.
Development
npm install
npm run build
npm testRun stdio from the built package:
JUNGLE_GRID_API_KEY=jg_placeholder node dist/index.jsRun HTTP locally:
MCP_TRANSPORT=http PORT=3000 JUNGLEGRID_INTERNAL_SERVICE_TOKEN=service_token_placeholder node dist/index.jsInspect with MCP Inspector:
JUNGLE_GRID_API_KEY=jg_placeholder npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector node dist/index.jsFull Documentation
Public Jungle Grid documentation: https://junglegrid.dev/docs
MCP documentation page: https://junglegrid.dev/docs/mcp
License
MIT
Available Tools
8 toolscancel_jobBDestructive
Cancel an existing Jungle Grid job. This may stop active execution and prevent further outputs.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| jobId | Yes | ||
| reason | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| data | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description confirms destructive behavior ('may stop active execution'), aligning with annotations (destructiveHint=true). However, it does not elaborate on side effects like loss of outputs or irreversibility beyond what annotations provide.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded with the verb 'Cancel'. No unnecessary words; every part serves the purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple 2-parameter tool with an output schema, the description is minimal but adequate. Could mention success/error behavior or state requirements for the job to be cancelable.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the parameters 'jobId' or 'reason'. The description adds no meaning beyond the schema's property names and types.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Cancel an existing Jungle Grid job' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings as the only cancel-related tool among list, get, submit, and estimate tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like submitting a new job or estimating. The description lacks explicit context for when cancellation is appropriate.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
estimate_jobARead-only
Estimate routing, capacity source, and expected cost for a proposed Jungle Grid workload without submitting it.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| workload | Yes | ||
| model_size | No | Optional model size in GB. | |
| image | No | ||
| command | No | ||
| args | No | ||
| routing_mode | No | ||
| template | No | ||
| notes | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| data | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the description need not reiterate safety. It adds value by specifying what the estimate covers (routing, capacity, cost). No contradictions with annotations. However, it omits details like rate limits or state effects, but these are less critical for a read-only estimate.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, well-structured sentence with no filler. It front-loads the key action and resource, making it easy to process. Every word contributes to understanding.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given 8 parameters (1 required) and an output schema, the description covers the tool's purpose but lacks parameter guidance. The complexity is moderate, and while the output schema reduces the need to explain return values, the missing parameter semantics leave the description incomplete for correct invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is only 13% (only model_size described). The tool description does not elaborate on how parameters like workload, routing_mode, image, command, etc., affect the estimate. With low coverage, the description should compensate but fails to add meaningful parameter context, leaving parameters ambiguous.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Estimate'), the resource ('Jungle Grid workload'), and the specific aspects estimated ('routing, capacity source, expected cost'). It also distinguishes itself from submission tools by noting 'without submitting it', making the purpose very specific.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies when to use this tool (before submission) versus the sibling 'submit_job'. However, it does not explicitly exclude cases like checking existing jobs or provide alternative contexts. While clear for its primary use case, additional guidance on when not to use it would improve this dimension.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_artifactBRead-only
Retrieve download information for a specific output artifact from a Jungle Grid job.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| jobId | Yes | ||
| artifactId | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| data | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, which align with the description's 'Retrieve' action. The description adds no further behavioral context (e.g., authentication, error handling). With annotations covering safety, a score of 3 is appropriate.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no filler, immediately conveys the tool's core action. Perfectly concise for a simple retrieval tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Output schema exists but is not visible; the description could clarify what 'download information' includes (URL, size, etc.). Given 2 required params and no nested objects, the description is minimally sufficient but leaves ambiguity about the return value.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the 'jobId' or 'artifactId' parameters or their formats. It simply repeats the noun 'specific output artifact', adding no semantic value over the schema property names.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the verb 'Retrieve' and the resource 'download information for a specific output artifact from a Jungle Grid job'. It distinguishes from siblings like 'list_artifacts' (list artifacts) and 'get_job' (get job info).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, limitations, or comparisons to siblings like 'list_artifacts' or 'get_job_logs'.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_jobARead-only
Retrieve current status and execution details for a specific Jungle Grid job belonging to the authenticated user.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| jobId | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| data | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false. The description adds 'belonging to the authenticated user' (auth constraint) and specifies 'status and execution details' as return content. No contradiction, but marginal additional value.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence with clear verb-object structure, no filler, directly conveys essential information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Output schema exists, so return values are documented externally. Description covers purpose and auth constraint. Annotations provide safety profile. Complete for a simple read operation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, but the single parameter jobId is self-explanatory given its name and the tool's purpose. The description does not add extra detail about jobId format or constraints, but baseline 3 is appropriate for a simple, clear parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly specifies the verb 'Retrieve' and the resource 'specific Jungle Grid job', distinguishing it from siblings like list_jobs (list all) and cancel_job (cancel). It also adds scope 'belonging to the authenticated user'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies use for retrieving a specific job's status/details, but lacks explicit guidance on when to use vs alternatives (e.g., when to use get_job vs get_job_logs or list_jobs). No when-not-to-use conditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_job_logsBRead-only
Retrieve execution logs for a specific Jungle Grid job belonging to the authenticated user.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| jobId | Yes | ||
| limit | No | ||
| cursor | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| data | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already mark this as read-only and non-destructive. The description adds the user-scoping constraint, which is valuable behavioral context. However, it does not disclose pagination behavior (despite the 'cursor' parameter), potential rate limits, or the fact that logs may be truncated. With annotations covering safety, this is adequate but not rich.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, perfectly scoped sentence that conveys the core action and resource. No extraneous information. Ideal conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has three parameters (one required) and an output schema exists, the description should cover parameter semantics and usage context. It fails on parameter explanation and provides no usage guidelines. The output schema likely covers return structure, but the description's gaps make the tool incomplete for an agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must explain parameters. Only 'jobId' is implicitly clear from the resource name. The optional parameters 'limit' and 'cursor' are not mentioned, leaving their semantics entirely unspecified. This is a significant gap that hampers correct invocation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the verb 'Retrieve' and the resource 'execution logs for a specific Jungle Grid job'. It adds a key constraint ('belonging to the authenticated user') that helps distinguish from potential admin-only tools. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'get_job' or 'get_artifact', preventing a perfect score.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'list_jobs' or 'get_job'. There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or any exclusion criteria, leaving the agent to infer usage solely from the tool name and description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
list_artifactsARead-only
List output artifacts associated with a specific Jungle Grid job.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| jobId | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| data | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is clear. The description adds that the tool lists 'output artifacts', which provides minor context beyond annotations. No additional behavioral traits (e.g., pagination, errors) are disclosed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, direct sentence of 10 words. It is front-loaded and contains no fluff, making it highly concise and structured.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a straightforward listing tool with one parameter and an output schema, the description adequately covers the basic purpose. It could be more complete by mentioning that it returns all artifacts for the job (no pagination implied). Still, it is sufficient given the tool's simplicity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It explains that the jobId parameter refers to a 'specific Jungle Grid job', but does not elaborate on format or source. For a single required parameter, this is marginal compensation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'list', the resource 'output artifacts', and the scope 'associated with a specific Jungle Grid job'. It distinguishes from siblings like get_artifact (single artifact) and list_jobs (list of jobs).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when you need to list artifacts for a given job, but does not explicitly state when to or not to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_artifact for a single artifact. No exclusions or alternative tools are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
list_jobsARead-only
List the authenticated user's Jungle Grid jobs, optionally filtered by status. Use this to find recent jobs before checking status, logs, or artifacts.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | ||
| cursor | No | ||
| status | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| data | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false. Description adds context about authentication and filtering, no contradictions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, front-loaded with action, no excess.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Covers purpose and usage context, but lacks details on pagination parameters and response structure despite output schema existence.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Only 'status' parameter is mentioned; 'limit' and 'cursor' (pagination) are not explained despite 0% schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states verb 'list', resource 'Jobs for authenticated user', and optional filter by status. Differentiates from siblings like get_job and list_artifacts with usage tip.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly advises using before status/log/artifact checks, but no explicit when-not-to-use or alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
submit_jobA
Submit a Jungle Grid workload for execution. This may start managed compute infrastructure and incur usage charges.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| workload | Yes | ||
| image | Yes | ||
| command | No | ||
| args | No | ||
| env | No | ||
| routing_mode | No | ||
| template | No | ||
| metadata | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| data | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate non-read-only and non-destructive. The description adds important behavioral context: starting infrastructure and incurring charges, which goes beyond the annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two focused sentences with no redundancy. Every word adds value.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite having an output schema and 9 parameters, the description provides minimal context. It lacks parameter guidance, error handling, or return value details, making it insufficient for a complex submission tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage for 9 parameters. The description does not explain any parameter's meaning or usage, leaving the agent to infer from names alone.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description explicitly states the action ('Submit') and the resource ('Jungle Grid workload for execution'), clearly distinguishing it from siblings like cancel_job or get_job.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description hints at when to use (for submission) and warns about potential charges and infrastructure startup, but does not explicitly compare to alternatives or state when not to use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
11 tool updates
v0.1.9- Changed
cancel_job5 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / jobIdAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - removed
Input schema / properties / job_idRemoved value: -{ - "description": "The ID of the job to cancel.", - "type": "string" -} - removed
Input schema / properties / reason / descriptionRemoved value: -"Optional cancellation reason." - changed
Input schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "job_id" -]New value: +[ + "jobId" +] - changed
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{ + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "data": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "cancelled": { + "type": "boolean" + }, + "id": { + "type": "string" + }, + "job_id": { + "type": "string" + }, + "message": { + "type": "string" + }, + "status": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" + } + }, + "required": [ + "data" + ], + "type": "object" +}
- Changed
estimate_job20 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / argsAdded value: +{ + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" +} - added
Input schema / properties / commandAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - removed
Input schema / properties / cost_priorityRemoved value: -{ - "enum": [ - "low", - "balanced", - "high" - ], - "type": "string" -} - removed
Input schema / properties / disk_gbRemoved value: -{ - "description": "Optional managed-provider local disk override in GB. Leave unset to let Jungle Grid auto-size from model_size_gb.", - "type": "number" -} - removed
Input schema / properties / gpu_classRemoved value: -{ - "enum": [ - "consumer", - "datacenter" - ], - "type": "string" -} - removed
Input schema / properties / gpu_typeRemoved value: -{ - "enum": [ - "A100", - "A10G", - "H100", - "L4", - "RTX3090", - "RTX4090", - "RTX5090", - "T4" - ], - "type": "string" -} - removed
Input schema / properties / image / descriptionRemoved value: -"Docker image to run." - removed
Input schema / properties / latency_priorityRemoved value: -{ - "enum": [ - "low", - "balanced", - "high" - ], - "type": "string" -} - added
Input schema / properties / model_sizeAdded value: +{ + "description": "Optional model size in GB.", + "type": "number" +} - removed
Input schema / properties / model_size_gbRemoved value: -{ - "description": "Approximate model size in GB — drives tier selection.", - "type": "number" -} - added
Input schema / properties / notesAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - removed
Input schema / properties / optimize_forRemoved value: -{ - "enum": [ - "balanced", - "cost", - "speed" - ], - "type": "string" -} - removed
Input schema / properties / region_modeRemoved value: -{ - "enum": [ - "prefer", - "strict" - ], - "type": "string" -} - removed
Input schema / properties / region_preferenceRemoved value: -{ - "type": "string" -} - added
Input schema / properties / routing_modeAdded value: +{ + "enum": [ + "cost", + "speed", + "balanced" + ], + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / templateAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / workloadAdded value: +{ + "enum": [ + "inference", + "training", + "fine_tuning", + "batch" + ], + "type": "string" +} - removed
Input schema / properties / workload_typeRemoved value: -{ - "enum": [ - "inference", - "training", - "fine-tuning", - "batch" - ], - "type": "string" -} - changed
Input schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "workload_type", - "image" -]New value: +[ + "workload" +] - changed
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{ + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "data": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "available": { + "type": "boolean" + }, + "can_submit": { + "type": "boolean" + }, + "capacity": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "estimate_source": { + "type": "string" + }, + "live_candidate_count": { + "type": "number" + }, + "live_capacity_available": { + "type": "boolean" + }, + "managed_capacity_available": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "boolean" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ] + }, + "managed_profile_count": { + "type": "number" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "classification": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "acceleration_requirement": { + "type": "string" + }, + "confidence": { + "type": "string" + }, + "reasons": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "requires_gpu": { + "type": "boolean" + }, + "workload_type": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "estimated_cost_max_usd": { + "type": "number" + }, + "estimated_cost_min_usd": { + "type": "number" + }, + "estimated_cost_usd": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "max": { + "type": "number" + }, + "min": { + "type": "number" + } + }, + "required": [ + "min", + "max" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "likely_gpu_type": { + "type": "string" + }, + "routed_gpu_tier": { + "type": "string" + }, + "routing": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "route_status": { + "type": "string" + }, + "selected_accelerator": { + "type": "string" + }, + "selected_route_source": { + "type": "string" + }, + "selection_reason": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "screening": {} + }, + "type": "object" + } + }, + "required": [ + "data" + ], + "type": "object" +}
- Added
get_artifact - Removed
get_artifact_download_url - Changed
get_job4 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / jobIdAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - removed
Input schema / properties / job_idRemoved value: -{ - "description": "The job ID returned by submit_job.", - "type": "string" -} - changed
Input schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "job_id" -]New value: +[ + "jobId" +] - changed
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{ + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "data": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "account_billing": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "lifetime_total_spent_usd": { + "type": "number" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "actual_cost_usd": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ] + }, + "artifacts_ready": { + "type": "boolean" + }, + "estimated_cost_usd": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "max": { + "type": "number" + }, + "min": { + "type": "number" + } + }, + "required": [ + "min", + "max" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "id": { + "type": "string" + }, + "job_id": { + "type": "string" + }, + "last_status_update": { + "type": "string" + }, + "phase": { + "type": "string" + }, + "status": { + "type": "string" + }, + "status_message": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" + } + }, + "required": [ + "data" + ], + "type": "object" +}
- Changed
get_job_logs6 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / cursorAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / jobIdAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - removed
Input schema / properties / job_idRemoved value: -{ - "description": "The job ID to fetch logs for.", - "type": "string" -} - added
Input schema / properties / limitAdded value: +{ + "type": "number" +} - changed
Input schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "job_id" -]New value: +[ + "jobId" +] - changed
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{ + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "data": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "items": { + "items": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "level": { + "type": "string" + }, + "message": { + "type": "string" + }, + "timestamp": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "job_id": { + "type": "string" + }, + "logs": { + "items": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "level": { + "type": "string" + }, + "message": { + "type": "string" + }, + "timestamp": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "message" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "next_cursor": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ] + } + }, + "type": "object" + } + }, + "required": [ + "data" + ], + "type": "object" +}
- Added
list_artifacts - Removed
list_job_artifacts - Changed
list_jobs6 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / cursorAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / limit / defaultAdded value: +10 - removed
Input schema / properties / limit / descriptionRemoved value: -"Maximum number of jobs to return (default 20, max 100)." - removed
Input schema / properties / status / descriptionRemoved value: -"Filter by job status." - removed
Input schema / properties / status / enumRemoved value: -[ - "pending", - "queued", - "running", - "completed", - "failed", - "cancelled" -] - changed
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{ + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "data": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "has_more": { + "type": "boolean" + }, + "jobs": { + "items": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "created_at": { + "type": "string" + }, + "id": { + "type": "string" + }, + "job_id": { + "type": "string" + }, + "name": { + "type": "string" + }, + "status": { + "type": "string" + }, + "updated_at": { + "type": "string" + }, + "workload_type": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number" + }, + "next_cursor": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ] + } + }, + "type": "object" + } + }, + "required": [ + "data" + ], + "type": "object" +}
- Removed
stream_job_logs - Changed
submit_job26 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / argsAdded value: +{ + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" +} - removed
Input schema / properties / command / descriptionRemoved value: -"Container entrypoint arguments (e.g. ['python', 'train.py', '--epochs', '10'])." - removed
Input schema / properties / command / itemsRemoved value: -{ - "type": "string" -} - changed
Input schema / properties / command / typePrevious value: -"array"New value: +"string" - removed
Input schema / properties / cost_priorityRemoved value: -{ - "description": "Cost sensitivity.", - "enum": [ - "low", - "balanced", - "high" - ], - "type": "string" -} - removed
Input schema / properties / disk_gbRemoved value: -{ - "description": "Optional managed-provider local disk override in GB. Leave unset to let Jungle Grid auto-size from model_size_gb.", - "type": "number" -} - added
Input schema / properties / envAdded value: +{ + "additionalProperties": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "object" +} - removed
Input schema / properties / environmentRemoved value: -{ - "additionalProperties": { - "type": "string" - }, - "description": "Environment variables injected into the container. Use this for large inline scripts such as CODE when you want to keep the command array short.", - "type": "object" -} - removed
Input schema / properties / gpu_classRemoved value: -{ - "description": "Optional soft GPU class preference.", - "enum": [ - "consumer", - "datacenter" - ], - "type": "string" -} - removed
Input schema / properties / gpu_typeRemoved value: -{ - "description": "Optional exact GPU override.", - "enum": [ - "A100", - "A10G", - "H100", - "L4", - "RTX3090", - "RTX4090", - "RTX5090", - "T4" - ], - "type": "string" -} - removed
Input schema / properties / huggingface_credential_idRemoved value: -{ - "description": "Optional saved Hugging Face credential to inject into the managed runtime. Falls back to your account default when omitted.", - "type": "string" -} - removed
Input schema / properties / image / descriptionRemoved value: -"Docker image to run (e.g. 'pytorch/pytorch:2.2.0-cuda12.1-cudnn8-runtime')." - removed
Input schema / properties / latency_priorityRemoved value: -{ - "description": "Latency sensitivity. Use 'high' for real-time inference.", - "enum": [ - "low", - "balanced", - "high" - ], - "type": "string" -} - added
Input schema / properties / metadataAdded value: +{ + "type": "object" +} - removed
Input schema / properties / model_size_gbRemoved value: -{ - "description": "Approximate model size in GB. Used to select the right GPU tier for inference jobs.", - "type": "number" -} - removed
Input schema / properties / name / descriptionRemoved value: -"Optional readable job name. A name is generated if omitted." - removed
Input schema / properties / optimize_forRemoved value: -{ - "description": "Scheduling optimization goal. 'speed' prioritises latency; 'cost' minimises spend.", - "enum": [ - "balanced", - "cost", - "speed" - ], - "type": "string" -} - removed
Input schema / properties / region_modeRemoved value: -{ - "description": "Region preference mode.", - "enum": [ - "prefer", - "strict" - ], - "type": "string" -} - removed
Input schema / properties / region_preferenceRemoved value: -{ - "description": "Optional preferred region such as us-east or eu-west.", - "type": "string" -} - added
Input schema / properties / routing_modeAdded value: +{ + "enum": [ + "cost", + "speed", + "balanced" + ], + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / templateAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - removed
Input schema / properties / webhook_urlRemoved value: -{ - "description": "Optional HTTPS URL to receive signed lifecycle event callbacks.", - "type": "string" -} - added
Input schema / properties / workloadAdded value: +{ + "enum": [ + "inference", + "training", + "fine_tuning", + "batch" + ], + "type": "string" +} - removed
Input schema / properties / workload_typeRemoved value: -{ - "description": "Type of GPU workload.", - "enum": [ - "inference", - "training", - "fine-tuning", - "batch" - ], - "type": "string" -} - changed
Input schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "workload_type", - "image", - "command" -]New value: +[ + "name", + "workload", + "image" +] - changed
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{ + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "data": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "estimated_cost_usd": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "properties": { + "max": { + "type": "number" + }, + "min": { + "type": "number" + } + }, + "required": [ + "min", + "max" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "id": { + "type": "string" + }, + "job_id": { + "type": "string" + }, + "status": { + "type": "string" + }, + "status_message": { + "type": "string" + }, + "submitted_at": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" + } + }, + "required": [ + "data" + ], + "type": "object" +}
9 tool updates
v0.1.0- First observed
cancel_job - First observed
estimate_job - First observed
get_artifact_download_url - First observed
get_job - First observed
get_job_logs - First observed
list_job_artifacts - First observed
list_jobs - First observed
stream_job_logs - First observed
submit_job
TDQS
Each tool targets a distinct operation (submit, cancel, estimate, get status, get logs, list, get artifact, list artifacts) with no overlap. The separation between job management and artifact management is clear.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (e.g., cancel_job, get_artifact, list_jobs). The naming is predictable and easy to understand.
With 8 tools, the server provides a focused but complete set for managing Jungle Grid jobs. Each tool serves a necessary function without bloat or undersupply.
Covers the core job lifecycle (submit, get, list, cancel, estimate, logs, artifacts). Missing an update/retry tool for modifying job parameters, but the core workflow is well-supported.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
HiveCompute MCP Server — decentralized inference router for AI agents
MCP server for building and testing AI agents with multi-model experimentation and insights.
MCP server connecting AI agents to non-custodial staking data across 130+ networks.
Tigris MCP Server seamlessly connects AI agents to Tigris bucket and object management.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI agents to interact with Modal, allowing them to deploy apps and run functions in a serverless cloud environment.73MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for monitoring and managing multi-cluster Slurm GPU jobs, enabling AI agents to execute commands, check allocations, and explore logs across HPC clusters.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables agents to dynamically switch between multiple AI models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, etc.) with unified protocol-driven configuration and capability discovery.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that converts SSH operations on training servers into AI-callable tools for GPU monitoring, job submission, file transfer, and more.1MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Jungle-Grid/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server