Skip to main content
Glama
John0615

mcp-readonly-code-server

by John0615

mcp-readonly-code-server

Minimal Node + TypeScript example project for a read-only MCP server that exposes one local code workspace to an AI client over stdio.

Project position

This repository is currently an example project, not a production-ready remote service.

It demonstrates how to:

  • build a read-only MCP server with the official TypeScript SDK

  • expose one local workspace root safely

  • serve MCP resources and a simple search tool over stdio

  • enforce basic deny rules for sensitive paths and file types

Related MCP server: MCP Filesystem Python

What this project exposes

  • Official MCP TypeScript SDK wired through McpServer

  • stdio bootstrap entry for local MCP hosts

  • Three read-only resources:

    • repo://overview

    • repo://tree/{path}

    • repo://file/{path}

  • One read-only tool:

    • search_code

  • A path guard that keeps all file access inside one workspace root

  • A sample-private-code/ directory for local smoke testing

Current behavior

This build exposes a real read-only code workspace through MCP resources plus one minimal search tool:

  • repo://overview explains the boundary and available surface

  • repo://tree/{path} lists files and directories under an allowed subtree

  • repo://file/{path} reads one allowed text file

  • search_code recursively searches text files and returns line-level matches

Safety rules:

  • all access stays inside WORKSPACE_ROOT

  • denied directories: .git, node_modules, dist, coverage

  • denied suffixes: .env, .pem, .key, .crt

  • binary and oversized files are rejected

Install

npm install

Run

Start the server in development mode:

npm run dev

By default, it exposes this sample directory:

sample-private-code/

Specify the project directory

Use WORKSPACE_ROOT to choose which local project the MCP server exposes.

Expose the sample directory explicitly:

WORKSPACE_ROOT=/home/zsp0509/node-projects/mcp-readonly-code-server/sample-private-code npm run dev

Expose this repository itself:

WORKSPACE_ROOT=/home/zsp0509/node-projects/mcp-readonly-code-server npm run dev

Expose another project:

WORKSPACE_ROOT=/path/to/your-project npm run dev

If the path contains spaces, quote it:

WORKSPACE_ROOT="/home/zsp0509/My Projects/app" npm run dev

Notes:

  • use an absolute path

  • one server instance exposes one workspace root

  • if you need multiple projects, configure multiple MCP server entries with different WORKSPACE_ROOT values

How agents call it

This project is a stdio MCP server.

That means:

  • it does not open an HTTP port

  • an MCP host starts the process directly

  • the host communicates with it through stdin and stdout

There are two common ways to use it:

1. Manual local run

You start it yourself in a terminal:

WORKSPACE_ROOT=/path/to/your-project npm run dev

In this mode, the process must keep running. If you stop it, the agent cannot call it.

2. Host-managed run

You register it in an MCP-capable host such as an inspector or desktop client.

In this mode, the host usually starts the process automatically when needed. You do not need to keep a separate terminal open.

Example MCP host configuration

Development command:

{
  "command": "node",
  "args": [
    "--import",
    "tsx",
    "/home/zsp0509/node-projects/mcp-readonly-code-server/src/index.ts"
  ],
  "env": {
    "WORKSPACE_ROOT": "/path/to/your-project"
  }
}

Built command:

{
  "command": "node",
  "args": [
    "/home/zsp0509/node-projects/mcp-readonly-code-server/dist/src/index.js"
  ],
  "env": {
    "WORKSPACE_ROOT": "/path/to/your-project"
  }
}

Multiple project host configuration

If you want one agent host to access multiple projects, register multiple MCP server entries.

Each entry uses the same server program but a different WORKSPACE_ROOT.

Example:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "crm-code": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": [
        "/home/zsp0509/node-projects/mcp-readonly-code-server/dist/src/index.js"
      ],
      "env": {
        "WORKSPACE_ROOT": "/srv/projects/crm"
      }
    },
    "admin-panel-code": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": [
        "/home/zsp0509/node-projects/mcp-readonly-code-server/dist/src/index.js"
      ],
      "env": {
        "WORKSPACE_ROOT": "/srv/projects/admin-panel"
      }
    }
  }
}

In that setup:

  • crm-code exposes only /srv/projects/crm

  • admin-panel-code exposes only /srv/projects/admin-panel

  • each server process keeps its own workspace boundary

You can do the same with the development entrypoint:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "crm-code-dev": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": [
        "--import",
        "tsx",
        "/home/zsp0509/node-projects/mcp-readonly-code-server/src/index.ts"
      ],
      "env": {
        "WORKSPACE_ROOT": "/srv/projects/crm"
      }
    },
    "admin-panel-code-dev": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": [
        "--import",
        "tsx",
        "/home/zsp0509/node-projects/mcp-readonly-code-server/src/index.ts"
      ],
      "env": {
        "WORKSPACE_ROOT": "/srv/projects/admin-panel"
      }
    }
  }
}

Use different server names so the host can distinguish them clearly.

Common host examples

Different MCP hosts may wrap server definitions differently, but the important part stays the same:

  • the command points to this server

  • each project gets its own server entry

  • each entry sets a different WORKSPACE_ROOT

Claude Desktop style

Some hosts use a top-level mcpServers object like this:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "crm-code": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": [
        "/home/zsp0509/node-projects/mcp-readonly-code-server/dist/src/index.js"
      ],
      "env": {
        "WORKSPACE_ROOT": "/srv/projects/crm"
      }
    },
    "admin-panel-code": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": [
        "/home/zsp0509/node-projects/mcp-readonly-code-server/dist/src/index.js"
      ],
      "env": {
        "WORKSPACE_ROOT": "/srv/projects/admin-panel"
      }
    }
  }
}

If you want to use the TypeScript entry during development, replace the command arguments with:

[
  "--import",
  "tsx",
  "/home/zsp0509/node-projects/mcp-readonly-code-server/src/index.ts"
]

Cherry Studio style

If your host asks you to add one MCP server at a time in a form or list UI, create two separate local command entries:

Server 1:

{
  "name": "crm-code",
  "command": "node",
  "args": [
    "/home/zsp0509/node-projects/mcp-readonly-code-server/dist/src/index.js"
  ],
  "env": {
    "WORKSPACE_ROOT": "/srv/projects/crm"
  }
}

Server 2:

{
  "name": "admin-panel-code",
  "command": "node",
  "args": [
    "/home/zsp0509/node-projects/mcp-readonly-code-server/dist/src/index.js"
  ],
  "env": {
    "WORKSPACE_ROOT": "/srv/projects/admin-panel"
  }
}

If the UI exposes separate fields instead of raw JSON, fill them like this:

  • Name: crm-code

  • Command: node

  • Args: /home/zsp0509/node-projects/mcp-readonly-code-server/dist/src/index.js

  • WORKSPACE_ROOT: /srv/projects/crm

Then add a second entry with a different name and project path.

Practical notes

  • prefer the built entrypoint dist/src/index.js for long-term use

  • use the src/index.ts entrypoint mainly for local development

  • if your host uses a different outer JSON shape, keep the inner command, args, and env.WORKSPACE_ROOT values the same

Build

Build the TypeScript output:

npm run build

Run the built server:

WORKSPACE_ROOT=/path/to/your-project npm run start

Smoke test

Run the in-process MCP client validation script:

npm run smoke

It validates:

  • repo://overview

  • repo://tree/{+path}

  • repo://file/{+path}

  • search_code

  • denied-path rejection for .git/config

Inspector checklist

If you want to verify the real stdio workflow with an MCP inspector or host:

  1. Start the server or register the command in your host.

  2. Point the inspector or host command at:

node --import tsx src/index.ts
  1. Set WORKSPACE_ROOT to the project you want to expose.

  2. Verify these calls:

  • read repo://overview

  • read repo://tree/controllers

  • read repo://file/controllers/user-controller.ts

  • call search_code with {"query":"return","path":"controllers"}

  • try denied path repo://file/.git/config

Limitations

Current scope:

  • stdio transport only

  • one workspace root per process

  • read-only resources and one minimal text search tool

If you want to deploy this on a remote server for agents on other machines, you would typically add an HTTP-based MCP transport in a follow-up implementation.

Available Tools

1 tool
search_codeB

Search text matches inside the configured read-only workspace root.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pathNoRelative directory path inside the workspace root..
queryYesSearch text.

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It states 'read-only workspace root' but does not explicitly confirm the tool is read-only, nor does it discuss side effects, permissions, search limitations (e.g., binary files, recursion, case sensitivity). This lack of transparency could lead to incorrect assumptions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is concise and to the point. It avoids unnecessary words, but could be slightly more informative without sacrificing brevity. It is well-structured and easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema and annotations, the description does not provide enough context for an agent to fully understand the tool's behavior. Missing details include return format, result limits, recursion behavior, and case sensitivity. For a search tool, more completeness is expected.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the parameter descriptions are already present. The description adds no additional semantic value beyond the schema, meeting the baseline of 3. It does not enhance understanding of parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches for text matches within the configured read-only workspace root. The verb 'search' and resource 'text matches' are specific, and the scope is defined. Even without sibling tools, the purpose is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance is provided. The description implies it is for text search inside the workspace, but does not mention alternatives or exclusions. Given no sibling tools, the lack of differentiation is less critical, but some guidance on when to choose this tool would be helpful.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 1 tool updatev0.1.0
    • First observedsearch_code

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The single tool's purpose is clearly defined.

Naming Consistency5/5

The sole tool 'search_code' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, making its purpose immediately understandable. Consistency is trivially maintained.

Tool Count2/5

A read-only code server with only one tool feels excessively limited. Typically, such a server would need multiple tools (e.g., list files, read file content) to be useful, making a single tool insufficient for the apparent scope.

Completeness1/5

The toolset is severely incomplete for a read-only code server. Essential operations like listing files or reading file contents are missing, leaving agents unable to perform basic code exploration tasks.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessSyncing

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A read-only MCP server for code reading with intelligent caching, line-range selection, and language detection, enabling AI assistants to efficiently and safely explore file systems.
    MIT
  • F
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A read-only MCP server that enables AI assistants to search files, list directories, retrieve system info, and get file metadata on the local file system.
    4
    -

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/John0615/mcp-readonly-code-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server