Jamf Docs MCP Server
The Jamf Docs MCP Server gives AI assistants direct access to official Jamf documentation from docs.jamf.com and learn.jamf.com, enabling intelligent search, retrieval, and exploration of Jamf product documentation.
Search documentation: Search across all Jamf product docs by keyword, with filters for product, topic, document type, version, and language; supports pagination and returns ranked snippets.
Retrieve articles: Fetch full content or specific sections of a documentation article; options for summary preview, related articles, and token-limited responses.
Browse table of contents: Get the navigation structure for a specific Jamf product and version.
Batch fetch: Retrieve up to 10 articles in a single concurrent request.
Glossary lookup: Find Jamf terminology definitions using fuzzy matching.
List products and filters: View all supported Jamf products, topics, and document types.
MCP prompts: Leverage pre-built workflows for structured troubleshooting, generating setup guides, and comparing product versions.
MCP resources: Access static/dynamic reference data (product lists, topics, TOCs, versions) without tool calls.
Multi-language support: Pass a language parameter (e.g.,
en-US,ja-JP,de-DE,zh-TW) for localized documentation.Output configuration: Control response detail (full/compact), format (markdown/JSON), and token limits.
HTTP/SSE transport: Run the server as a remote endpoint with rate limiting, CORS, and health checks, in addition to stdio mode.
Client integrations: Compatible with Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients via stdio or HTTP.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Jamf Docs MCP ServerHow do I configure SSO in Jamf Pro?"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Jamf Docs MCP Server
An MCP server that gives AI assistants (Claude, Cursor, etc.) direct access to Jamf official documentation. Ask Jamf-related questions and get answers based on the latest docs from learn.jamf.com.
Supported Products: Jamf Pro, Jamf School, Jamf Connect, Jamf Protect, Jamf Now, Jamf Safe Internet, Jamf Insights, RapidIdentity, Jamf Trust, Jamf Routines, Self Service+, Jamf App Catalog
Installation
@modelcontextprotocol/server is a peer dependency, and the CLI imports it
at startup (dist/index.js → @modelcontextprotocol/server/stdio). If it is
missing from the install tree the process exits immediately with
ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND — the install itself succeeds, so the failure only
shows up when you run the server.
Most install paths bring it in automatically:
Install method | Peer installed |
| Yes |
| Yes |
| Yes |
| No |
Yarn 1 (classic) | No |
If you use one of the last two — or if you are vendoring the package — install the SDK alongside it:
npm install @get-technology-inc/jamf-docs-mcp-server @modelcontextprotocol/server@^2Why it is a peer dependency, not a regular one. This package hands
McpServer instances to its consumers, and those consumers pass them to
createMcpHandler from their own SDK copy. If the two resolve to different
copies of the SDK, an instance built by one module's Protocol is inspected by
another's, and every 2026-07-28 request fails with
Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'includes') — an HTTP 500 with
no useful diagnostic. Declaring the SDK as a peer states the single-copy
requirement instead of relying on the consumer's tree happening to hoist it;
listing it under dependencies as well would reintroduce exactly the duplicate
it exists to prevent.
Node.js 20 or newer is required.
Related MCP server: Apple Dev MCP Server
Quick Start
Claude Desktop
Edit claude_desktop_config.json:
macOS:
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.jsonWindows:
%APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"jamf-docs": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@get-technology-inc/jamf-docs-mcp-server"]
}
}
}Restart Claude Desktop to apply.
Claude Code (CLI)
claude mcp add jamf-docs -- npx -y @get-technology-inc/jamf-docs-mcp-serverCursor
Edit ~/.cursor/mcp.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"jamf-docs": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@get-technology-inc/jamf-docs-mcp-server"]
}
}
}Verify Installation
Test with MCP Inspector:
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector npx -y @get-technology-inc/jamf-docs-mcp-serverUsage Examples
Once configured, just ask your AI assistant:
"How do I configure SSO in Jamf Pro?"
"What are the system requirements for Jamf Protect?"
"Explain the MDM enrollment process"
"What changed in the latest Jamf Connect release notes?"
Available Tools
Tool | Description |
| List all supported products, topics, and document type filters |
| Search documentation by keyword with filtering and pagination |
| Retrieve full content of a specific documentation article |
| Browse the table of contents for a product |
| Fetch multiple articles in one call (up to 10 URLs) |
| Look up Jamf terminology and definitions (fuzzy matching) |
jamf_docs_list_products
Returns all available Jamf products and their IDs, available topic filters, and document type filters.
Parameter | Type | Default | Description |
| string |
| Documentation language/locale |
|
|
| Detail level of the response |
|
|
| Output format |
| number (100–20000) |
| Maximum tokens in response |
jamf_docs_search
Searches across all Jamf product documentation.
Parameter | Type | Default | Description |
| string (2–200 chars) | required | Search keywords |
| string | — | Filter by product ID (e.g., |
| string | — | Filter by topic category (e.g., |
| string | — | Filter by document type: |
| string | — | Filter by version (e.g., |
| string |
| Documentation language/locale |
| number (1–50) |
| Results per page |
| number (1–100) |
| Page number for pagination |
| number (100–20000) |
| Maximum tokens in response |
|
|
| Detail level; use |
|
|
| Output format |
jamf_docs_get_article
Fetches and converts a documentation article to clean markdown or JSON.
Parameter | Type | Default | Description |
| string | required | Full URL from |
| string | — | Extract only a named section (e.g., |
| boolean |
| Return only article outline — token-efficient way to preview before fetching full content |
| boolean |
| Include links to related articles |
| string |
| Documentation language/locale |
| number (100–20000) |
| Maximum tokens in response |
|
|
| Detail level; |
|
|
| Output format |
When content exceeds maxTokens, the tool truncates the response and lists all available sections with their token counts. Use the section parameter on a follow-up call to retrieve a specific part.
jamf_docs_get_toc
Retrieves the navigation structure (table of contents) for a product.
Parameter | Type | Default | Description |
| string | required | Product ID (see supported products below) |
| string | latest | Specific version to fetch |
| string |
| Documentation language/locale |
| number (1–100) |
| Page number for paginated TOC |
| number (100–20000) |
| Maximum tokens in response |
|
|
| Use |
|
|
| Output format |
jamf_docs_batch_get_articles
Fetches multiple documentation articles in a single call. Each URL is fetched concurrently, and invalid domains are reported as per-article errors without failing the entire batch.
Parameter | Type | Default | Description |
| string[] (1–10) | required | Array of Jamf documentation URLs |
| number (1–5) |
| Maximum parallel requests |
| string |
| Documentation language/locale |
| number (100–20000) |
| Total token budget across all articles |
|
|
| Detail level per article |
|
|
| Output format |
jamf_docs_glossary_lookup
Looks up a term in the Jamf official glossary and returns matching definitions using fuzzy matching. Glossary content is currently English-only; non-English language values are accepted but results will be in English.
Parameter | Type | Default | Description |
| string (2–100 chars) | required | Glossary term to look up |
| string | — | Filter by product ID |
| string |
| Documentation language/locale (glossary is English-only) |
| number (100–50000) |
| Maximum tokens in response |
|
|
| Detail level |
|
|
| Output format |
MCP Resources
Static and dynamic reference data accessible without tool calls:
Resource | URI | Description |
Products list |
| All available Jamf products with IDs and version info (fetched dynamically from API) |
Topics list |
| Topic categories for filtering documentation searches |
Product TOC |
| Table of contents for a specific product (template resource) |
Product versions |
| Available documentation versions for a specific product (template resource) |
Template resources support tab-completion on productId in compatible clients.
MCP Prompts
Pre-built prompt workflows that guide the AI through multi-step documentation tasks:
jamf_troubleshoot
Guides the AI through a structured troubleshooting workflow: searching for relevant documentation, previewing articles with summaryOnly, then providing a root-cause diagnosis and step-by-step resolution.
Argument | Type | Description |
| string (required) | Description of the issue to troubleshoot |
| string (optional) | Jamf product ID to scope the search |
jamf_setup_guide
Directs the AI to generate a step-by-step setup guide for a Jamf feature, including prerequisites, configuration steps, and verification.
Argument | Type | Description |
| string (required) | The feature or capability to set up |
| string (optional) | Jamf product ID to scope the search |
jamf_compare_versions
Instructs the AI to compare table-of-contents structures and key articles between two product versions, summarizing new features, removed capabilities, and migration considerations.
Argument | Type | Description |
| string (required) | Jamf product ID |
| string (required) | First version to compare (e.g., |
| string (required) | Second version to compare (e.g., |
Supported Products
Product ID | Name | Description |
| Jamf Pro | Apple device management for enterprise |
| Jamf School | Apple device management for education |
| Jamf Connect | Identity and access management |
| Jamf Protect | Endpoint security for Apple |
| Jamf Now | Simple Apple device management for small businesses |
| Jamf Safe Internet | Content filtering and web security for education and business |
| Jamf Insights | Analytics and reporting platform for Apple fleet |
| RapidIdentity | Identity and access management platform |
| Jamf Trust | Zero-trust network access for Apple devices |
| Jamf Routines | Automated workflow orchestration for device management |
| Self Service+ | Next-generation self-service portal for macOS |
| Jamf App Catalog | Curated application catalog for managed deployments |
Key Features
Compact Mode: Use
outputMode: "compact"for token-efficient responses; articles show a ~500-token preview with an available sections listSummary Only: Use
summaryOnly: trueonjamf_docs_get_articleto preview an article outline before fetching full contentSection Extraction: Use
section: "Prerequisites"to retrieve only the part of an article you needBatch Fetching: Use
jamf_docs_batch_get_articlesto fetch up to 10 articles in one call with concurrent requestsGlossary Lookup: Use
jamf_docs_glossary_lookupto look up Jamf terminology with fuzzy matchingMulti-language: All tools accept a
languageparameter for localized documentation (e.g.,ja-JP,de-DE)Document Type Filter: Use
docTypeonjamf_docs_searchto narrow results torelease-notes,install-guide,technical-paper,configuration-guide, ortrainingVersion Query: Use the
versionparameter to query documentation for a specific product versionPagination: Search results support
pageandlimit; table of contents supportspage; product lists are not paginatedSearch Suggestions: Receive helpful suggestions when a search returns no results
Token Management: All tools accept a
maxTokensparameter (100–20000, default 5000) to control response size
MCP Apps (interactive viewer)
Hosts that negotiate the MCP Apps extension (io.modelcontextprotocol/ui) render
jamf_docs_search, jamf_docs_get_toc and jamf_docs_get_article results as an
interactive viewer instead of plain markdown: search hits are clickable through to
the article, TOC entries open in place, and articles carry section navigation and a
back stack. All three tools reference one self-contained ui:// resource, whose
URI carries a hash of the bundle it names (ui://jamf-docs/app-<hash>.html).
Hosts that do not negotiate the extension ignore the metadata and get exactly the
markdown they always did.
The resource is served with a 24-hour public cache hint, which is safe precisely
because the URI is content-addressed: a given URI names one exact bundle forever,
and a new bundle arrives under a new URI rather than replacing an old one. Hosts
pick up a changed viewer on their next tools/list refresh.
The MCP Apps viewer is broken in 4.0.0 — upgrade past it. The build step that
inlines the UI bundle into the HTML document used a replacement string, so every
$ pattern in the minified JavaScript was expanded instead of copied. The
document that shipped is not parseable JavaScript, and a host that renders it gets
SyntaxError: missing ) after argument list and a blank panel. Nothing else in
4.0.0 is affected — tools, resources and prompts return the same results either
way, since a host that cannot render the app falls back to the markdown. Fixed in
4.0.1.
4.0.1 alone did not reach every host. Up to and including 4.0.1 the resource
lived at a fixed ui://jamf-docs/app.html with a 24-hour public cache hint, so a
host that had read the broken 4.0.0 bundle kept serving it from cache for up to a
day after the server was upgraded — the corrected bundle was published under the
same URI and never fetched. Upgrading past 4.0.1 fixes the distribution as well as
the bundle: the URI now changes with the content, so a host holding the 4.0.0 copy
simply stops asking for it. No manual cache clearing is needed, and the remaining
delay is the one-hour tools/list hint rather than 24 hours.
HTTP/SSE Transport Mode
In addition to the default stdio transport, the server supports an HTTP transport for use as a remote or shared MCP endpoint.
Starting the HTTP Server
# Using the npm script (defaults: localhost:3000)
npm run start:http
# Using the built binary directly with custom options
node dist/index.js --transport http --port 8080 --host 127.0.0.1CLI Arguments
Argument | Default | Description |
|
| Transport mode: |
|
| Port to listen on (1–65535) |
|
| Host to bind to |
Security note: The default host
127.0.0.1restricts access to localhost only. Binding to0.0.0.0exposes the server to the network; only do this in controlled environments.
HTTP Endpoints
Endpoint | Method | Description |
|
| MCP JSON-RPC endpoint (streamable HTTP transport) |
|
| Health check — returns |
Connecting an MCP Client via HTTP
Claude Desktop or other MCP clients that support HTTP transport can connect with:
{
"mcpServers": {
"jamf-docs": {
"url": "http://127.0.0.1:3000/mcp"
}
}
}CORS Configuration
By default the server does not set CORS headers (cross-origin requests are blocked). To allow specific origins, set the CORS_ALLOWED_ORIGINS environment variable:
CORS_ALLOWED_ORIGINS=https://myapp.example.com node dist/index.js --transport httpMultiple origins are separated by commas.
Rate Limiting
The HTTP server applies per-IP token-bucket rate limiting. The default is 60 requests per minute. Override with the RATE_LIMIT_RPM environment variable.
Configuration
All settings are optional. Set them as environment variables before launching the server.
Cache Settings
Variable | Default | Range | Description |
|
| — | Cache directory (relative paths must stay within the project; sensitive system paths are rejected) |
|
| 1 min–30 days | TTL for search result cache entries |
|
| 1 min–30 days | TTL for article content cache entries |
|
| 1 min–30 days | TTL for product list cache entries |
|
| 1 min–30 days | TTL for table of contents cache entries |
|
| 10–10000 | Maximum number of entries kept in the in-memory cache |
Request Settings
Variable | Default | Range | Description |
|
| 1000–60000 ms | HTTP request timeout |
|
| 0–10 | Number of retry attempts on failure |
|
| 100–30000 ms | Delay between retries |
|
| 0–10000 ms | Delay between outbound requests (politeness) |
|
| — | User-Agent header sent to learn.jamf.com |
HTTP Transport Settings
Variable | Default | Range | Description |
|
| 1–10000 | Inbound requests per minute per IP (HTTP transport only) |
| `` (empty) | — | Comma-separated list of allowed CORS origins (HTTP transport only) |
Development
git clone https://github.com/GET-Technology-Inc/jamf-docs-mcp-server.git
cd jamf-docs-mcp-server
npm install
npm run dev # stdio mode with file watching
npm run start:http # HTTP transport modeAvailable Scripts
Script | Description |
| Compile TypeScript to |
| Development mode with auto-reload (stdio) |
| Start HTTP/SSE transport mode |
| Run all tests |
| Unit tests only |
| Integration tests only |
| End-to-end tests only |
| Test coverage report |
| Launch MCP Inspector against local build |
| Lint source files |
| TypeScript type check without emitting |
License
MIT - Copyright (c) 2025 GET Technology Inc.
Disclaimer
This is an unofficial tool and is not affiliated with Jamf.
Links
Available Tools
6 toolsjamf_docs_batch_get_articlesBatch Get Jamf Documentation ArticlesARead-onlyIdempotent
Retrieve multiple Jamf documentation articles in a single request.
Fetches up to 10 articles in parallel with concurrency control. Useful for comparing articles, gathering information from multiple pages, or bulk research.
Args:
urls (string[], required): Array of 1-10 article URLs (must be from docs.jamf.com or learn.jamf.com)
concurrency (number, optional): Max parallel requests 1-5 (default: 3)
maxTokens (number, optional): Total token budget across all articles 100-50000 (default: 5000). Distributed evenly.
outputMode ('full' | 'compact'): Output detail level (default: 'full'). Use 'compact' for brief output.
responseFormat ('markdown' | 'json'): Output format (default: 'markdown')
Returns: An array of article results. Each article independently succeeds or fails. For JSON format, returns a BatchResponse object with results, summary, and tokenInfo.
Examples:
Compare two products: urls=["https://learn.jamf.com/.../page/A.html", "https://learn.jamf.com/.../page/B.html"]
Bulk fetch with compact output: urls=[...], outputMode="compact", maxTokens=10000
Note: Token budget is split evenly across articles. Use higher maxTokens for more articles. Partial failures are reported per-article without failing the entire batch.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| urls | Yes | Array of Jamf documentation article URLs (1-10) | |
| language | No | Documentation language/locale (default: en-US). Options: en-US, ja-JP, zh-TW, de-DE, es-ES, fr-FR, nl-NL, th-TH | |
| maxTokens | No | Total token budget across all articles (100-50000, default: 5000) | |
| outputMode | No | Output detail level: "full" for detailed output or "compact" for brief output | full |
| concurrency | No | Maximum parallel requests (1-5, default: 3) | |
| responseFormat | No | Output format: "markdown" for human-readable or "json" for machine-readable | markdown |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| results | Yes | |
| summary | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate readOnly, openWorld, idempotent, and non-destructive behavior. The description adds valuable context beyond annotations: parallel execution with concurrency control, independent success/failure per article, partial failure reporting without failing the batch, and token budget distribution. No contradiction with annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured with Args, Returns, Examples, and Note sections. Every sentence adds useful information: constraints, defaults, behavioral notes, and examples. Despite its length, it is appropriately sized for a tool with six parameters and complex batch behavior, and it is front-loaded with the primary purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity (batch retrieval, concurrency, token budget, partial failures), the description covers all essential aspects: input constraints, parameter defaults, return format details, example usage, and fallback behavior. The presence of an output schema reduces the need to enumerate return fields, but the description still summarizes the return structure adequately.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Every parameter in the schema has a description, and the tool description elaborates further with semantics such as 'Distributed evenly' for maxTokens, 'Use compact for brief output', and constraints like 'must be from docs.jamf.com or learn.jamf.com' for URLs. The description adds meaning beyond the schema's property descriptions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool retrieves multiple Jamf documentation articles in a single request, using a specific verb and resource. It explicitly mentions fetching up to 10 articles in parallel, which distinguishes it from the sibling tool jamf_docs_get_article that likely handles single articles.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear use cases: 'useful for comparing articles, gathering information from multiple pages, or bulk research.' It does not explicitly mention when not to use it or name alternative tools, but the context is sufficient for an agent to decide. A slightly lower score is given for missing explicit exclusions or alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
jamf_docs_get_articleGet Jamf Documentation ArticleARead-onlyIdempotent
Retrieve the full content of a specific Jamf documentation article.
This tool fetches and parses a Jamf documentation article, converting it to a clean, readable format. Works with any article from docs.jamf.com or learn.jamf.com.
Args:
url (string, required): Full URL of the article (must be from docs.jamf.com or learn.jamf.com)
section (string, optional): Extract only a specific section by title or ID (e.g., "Prerequisites", "Configuration")
summaryOnly (boolean, optional): Return only article summary and outline instead of full content (default: false). Token-efficient way to preview an article
includeRelated (boolean, optional): Include links to related articles (default: false)
maxTokens (number, optional): Maximum tokens in response 100-50000 (default: 5000)
outputMode ('full' | 'compact'): Output detail level (default: 'full'). Use 'compact' for brief output
responseFormat ('markdown' | 'json'): Output format (default: 'markdown')
Returns: For JSON format: { "title": string, "content": string, "url": string, "product": string, "version": string, "breadcrumb": string[], "relatedArticles": [...], "tokenInfo": { "tokenCount": number, "truncated": boolean, "maxTokens": number }, "sections": [ { "id": string, "title": string, "level": number, "tokenCount": number } ] }
For Markdown format: The article content with token info and available sections.
Examples:
Get full article: url="https://learn.jamf.com/en-US/bundle/jamf-pro-documentation/page/Configuration_Profiles.html"
Get specific section: url="...", section="Prerequisites"
Limit response size: url="...", maxTokens=2000
Errors:
"Article not found (404)" if the URL returns a 404 error
"Invalid URL" if the URL is not from docs.jamf.com or learn.jamf.com
"Section not found" if the specified section doesn't exist (will list available sections)
Note: Large articles are intelligently truncated with remaining sections listed.
Use the section parameter to retrieve specific sections for long articles.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | No | Full URL of the Jamf documentation article. Alternative: use mapId + contentId for direct fetch. | |
| mapId | No | Fluid Topics map ID (from search results or TOC). Use with contentId for direct fetch. | |
| section | No | Extract only a specific section by title or ID (e.g., "Prerequisites", "Configuration") | |
| language | No | Documentation language/locale (default: en-US). Options: en-US, ja-JP, zh-TW, de-DE, es-ES, fr-FR, nl-NL, th-TH | |
| contentId | No | Fluid Topics content ID (from search results or TOC). Use with mapId for direct fetch. | |
| maxTokens | No | Maximum tokens in response (100-50000, default: 5000) | |
| outputMode | No | Output detail level: "full" for detailed output or "compact" for brief output | full |
| summaryOnly | No | Return only article summary and outline instead of full content (token-efficient) | |
| includeRelated | No | Include related article links in the response | |
| responseFormat | No | Output format: "markdown" for human-readable or "json" for machine-readable | markdown |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | |
| mapId | No | |
| title | Yes | |
| content | Yes | |
| product | No | |
| version | No | |
| sections | Yes | |
| contentId | No | |
| truncated | Yes | |
| breadcrumb | No | |
| navigation | No | |
| tokenCount | No | |
| lastUpdated | No | |
| contentLocale | No | |
| versionStatus | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already mark this as read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive, but the description adds important behavioral context beyond that: it mentions 'Large articles are intelligently truncated with remaining sections listed,' lists possible errors (404, invalid URL, section not found), and clarifies that summaryOnly is a token-efficient preview. These details help the agent predict and handle edge cases without contradicting any annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured with clear sections (Args, Returns, Examples, Errors, Note) and is front-loaded with the main purpose. While it is lengthy, every section serves a purpose, and the JSON return example is useful given the tool's complexity. It is slightly redundant with the schema (e.g., listing default values), but that redundancy is acceptable for discoverability.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity (10 parameters, output schema, sibling tools), the description is highly complete. It covers return formats, error handling, truncation behavior, and provides multiple usage examples. The existence of an output schema does not reduce the value of the description's own Returns section, which clarifies how each parameter affects the response.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema descriptions cover 100% of parameters, so baseline is 3. The description adds examples and explains token efficiency, but its Args list omits mapId, contentId, and language, and incorrectly labels url as 'required' when the schema has no required fields. This misleading detail undermines the added value, making it a net-neutral contribution beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Retrieve the full content of a specific Jamf documentation article.' It uses a specific verb (retrieve) and resource (article), and distinguishes itself from siblings like search, list_products, and get_toc by focusing on fetching a known article's content.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Provides clear context on when to use the tool: 'Works with any article from docs.jamf.com or learn.jamf.com.' Includes examples (e.g., full article, specific section, maxTokens) and a note about using the section parameter for long articles. However, it does not explicitly mention alternative tools like search or list_products, so it stops short of giving exclusionary guidance.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
jamf_docs_get_tocGet Documentation Table of ContentsARead-onlyIdempotent
Get the table of contents for a Jamf product's documentation.
This tool retrieves the navigation structure for a specific Jamf product, allowing you to browse available documentation topics.
Args:
product (string, required): Product ID - one of: jamf-pro, jamf-school, jamf-connect, jamf-protect, jamf-now, jamf-safe-internet, jamf-insights, jamf-rapididentity, jamf-trust, jamf-routines, self-service-plus, jamf-app-catalog
version (string, optional): Specific version (defaults to latest)
page (number, optional): Page number for pagination 1-100 (default: 1)
maxTokens (number, optional): Maximum tokens in response 100-50000 (default: 5000)
outputMode ('full' | 'compact'): Output detail level (default: 'full'). Use 'compact' for flat list without nested children
responseFormat ('markdown' | 'json'): Output format (default: 'markdown')
Returns: For JSON format: { "product": string, "version": string, "mapId": string, // omitted when the map could not be resolved "toc": [...], // each entry carries title, url and contentId "tokenInfo": { "tokenCount": number, "truncated": boolean, "maxTokens": number }, "pagination": { "page": number, "pageSize": number, "totalPages": number, "totalItems": number, "hasNext": boolean, "hasPrev": boolean } }
For Markdown format: A hierarchical list of documentation topics with pagination and token info.
Examples:
Browse Jamf Pro documentation: product="jamf-pro"
Get page 2 of TOC: product="jamf-pro", page=2
Limit response size: product="jamf-pro", maxTokens=2000
Errors:
"Invalid product ID" if the product is not recognized
"Version not found" if the specified version doesn't exist
Note: Use this to discover what topics are available before searching or retrieving specific articles. Large TOCs are paginated. The response-level mapId and an entry's contentId together form the pair jamf_docs_get_article accepts for a direct fetch. Markdown output shows the mapId only; use responseFormat="json" (or read structuredContent) for the per-entry contentIds. structuredContent.entries is the TOC flattened in document order and always carries every descendant; each entry's depth (0 for top level) is what restores the nesting. The markdown is not the same view: outputMode="full" shows that nesting as indentation, while outputMode="compact" lists only the top-level entries and shows no nesting at all.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | No | Page number for pagination (1-100, default: 1) | |
| product | Yes | Product ID: jamf-pro, jamf-school, jamf-connect, jamf-protect, jamf-now, jamf-safe-internet, jamf-insights, jamf-rapididentity, jamf-trust, jamf-routines, self-service-plus, jamf-app-catalog | |
| version | No | Specific version (defaults to latest) | |
| language | No | Documentation language/locale (default: en-US). Options: en-US, ja-JP, zh-TW, de-DE, es-ES, fr-FR, nl-NL, th-TH | |
| maxTokens | No | Maximum tokens in response (100-50000, default: 5000) | |
| outputMode | No | Output detail level: "full" for detailed output or "compact" for brief output | full |
| responseFormat | No | Output format: "markdown" for human-readable or "json" for machine-readable | markdown |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| page | Yes | |
| mapId | No | |
| entries | Yes | |
| hasMore | Yes | |
| product | Yes | |
| version | Yes | |
| productId | Yes | |
| totalPages | Yes | |
| versionNote | No | |
| totalEntries | Yes | |
| paginationNote | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnly, openWorld, idempotent, and non-destructive, but the description adds substantial behavioral context: it explains the return structure (mapId, contentId, tokenInfo, pagination), how outputMode affects nesting, how structuredContent flattens the TOC with depth values, and how markdown vs JSON differ in exposing contentIds. It also discloses error types and the relationship with jamf_docs_get_article. This goes well beyond the annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Though long, the description is efficiently structured with clear sections (Args, Returns, Examples, Errors, Note). Every sentence adds functional value: parameter details, return format, usage examples, error handling, and cross-tool integration. The opening sentence front-loads the purpose, and the note clarifies edge cases without redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity—7 parameters, multiple output formats, pagination, structuredContent behavior, and integration with jamf_docs_get_article—the description is remarkably complete. It covers all aspects an agent needs: what it does, when to use it, how parameters affect behavior, what the return looks like, errors, and examples. The presence of an output schema does not reduce the need for this contextual detail, and the description delivers it fully.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers all 7 parameters with descriptions, enum values, and defaults, so baseline is 3. The description adds meaningful nuance beyond the schema, such as clarifying that outputMode='compact' gives 'flat list without nested children' (schema just says 'brief output') and explaining how responseFormat affects whether contentIds are visible. It also shows example parameter combinations. This extra context justifies a 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description opens with a specific verb+resource: 'Get the table of contents for a Jamf product's documentation.' It clearly distinguishes this from sibling tools by focusing on navigation structure and topic discovery rather than search or article retrieval. The purpose is unambiguous and immediately actionable.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explicitly states when to use the tool: 'Use this to discover what topics are available before searching or retrieving specific articles.' It also notes that large TOCs are paginated, implying you should handle pagination. While it doesn't explicitly contrast with every sibling tool, the discovery-first guidance is clear and useful.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
jamf_docs_glossary_lookupLookup Jamf Glossary TermARead-onlyIdempotent
Look up a term in the Jamf official glossary and get its definition.
This tool searches glossary pages across Jamf product documentation and returns matching term definitions using fuzzy matching.
Note: Glossary content is currently only available in English (en-US). Non-English language parameters are accepted but results will be in English.
Args:
term (string, required): Glossary term to look up (2-100 characters). Supports fuzzy matching.
product (string, optional): Filter by product ID (use jamf_docs_list_products to see all)
language (string, optional): Documentation language/locale (default: en-US). Note: glossary is English-only.
maxTokens (number, optional): Maximum tokens in response 100-50000 (default: 5000)
outputMode ('full' | 'compact'): Output detail level (default: 'full')
responseFormat ('markdown' | 'json'): Output format (default: 'markdown')
Returns: For JSON format: { "term": string, "totalMatches": number, "entries": [{ "term": string, "definition": string, "product": string, "url": string }], "tokenInfo": { "tokenCount": number, "truncated": boolean, "maxTokens": number } }
For Markdown format: A formatted list of glossary definitions with source links.
Examples:
"What is MDM?" → term="MDM"
"Configuration Profile in Jamf Pro" → term="Configuration Profile", product="jamf-pro"
"What does DEP stand for?" → term="DEP"
Errors:
"No matching term found" if no glossary entries match
"Invalid product ID" if product parameter is not recognized
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| term | Yes | Glossary term to look up (e.g., "MDM", "Configuration Profile", "Smart Group") | |
| product | No | Filter by product: jamf-pro, jamf-school, jamf-connect, jamf-protect, jamf-now, jamf-safe-internet, jamf-insights, jamf-rapididentity, jamf-trust, jamf-routines, self-service-plus, jamf-app-catalog | |
| language | No | Documentation language/locale (default: en-US). Options: en-US, ja-JP, zh-TW, de-DE, es-ES, fr-FR, nl-NL, th-TH | |
| maxTokens | No | Maximum tokens in response (100-50000, default: 5000) | |
| outputMode | No | Output detail level: "full" for detailed output or "compact" for brief output | full |
| responseFormat | No | Output format: "markdown" for human-readable or "json" for machine-readable | markdown |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| term | Yes | |
| entries | Yes | |
| truncated | Yes | |
| totalMatches | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and idempotentHint, but the description adds critical behavioral context: fuzzy matching, the English-only limitation for glossary content despite the language parameter, and the effect on results. It also discloses error messages and output structure, going well beyond the annotation baseline.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-organized into clear sections (main purpose, note, Args, Returns, Examples, Errors) and remains readable despite its length. Every sentence contributes meaningful information, and the core purpose is front-loaded with no redundant fluff.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity and the presence of a full output schema, the description thoroughly covers selection criteria, invocation parameters, output formats, examples, and potential error messages. It fully equips an agent to select and invoke the tool correctly without needing to infer details.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema descriptions cover all 6 parameters, but the description enriches them by explaining the English-only caveat for the language parameter, providing illustrative examples for term and product, and detailing the JSON return structure. This adds value beyond the schema's baseline.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose with a specific verb and resource: 'Look up a term in the Jamf official glossary and get its definition.' It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like jamf_docs_search and jamf_docs_get_article by focusing exclusively on glossary terms and mentioning fuzzy matching.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear context for when to use this tool: to look up glossary terms. It includes examples of natural language queries and offers parameters for filtering by product. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or directly name alternatives, falling short of the full 'when/when-not' guidance.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
jamf_docs_list_productsList Jamf ProductsARead-onlyIdempotent
List all available Jamf products, topics, and their documentation versions.
This tool returns information about all Jamf products with available documentation, including Jamf Pro, Jamf School, Jamf Connect, Jamf Protect, Jamf Now, Jamf Safe Internet, and more. Also lists available topic and docType filters for search.
Args:
maxTokens (number, optional): Maximum tokens in response 100-50000 (default: 5000)
outputMode ('full' | 'compact'): Output detail level (default: 'full'). Use 'compact' for brief list
responseFormat ('markdown' | 'json'): Output format (default: 'markdown')
Returns: For JSON format: { "products": [...], "topics": [...], "tokenInfo": { "tokenCount": number, "truncated": boolean, "maxTokens": number } }
For Markdown format: A formatted list of products and topics with their details.
Examples:
"What Jamf products are available?" → use this tool
"List all Jamf documentation" → use this tool
"What topics can I filter by?" → use this tool
Note: This is a read-only operation that does not modify any state.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| maxTokens | No | Maximum tokens in response (100-50000, default: 5000) | |
| outputMode | No | Output detail level: "full" for detailed output or "compact" for brief output | full |
| responseFormat | No | Output format: "markdown" for human-readable or "json" for machine-readable | markdown |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| topics | Yes | |
| products | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, and the description reinforces this with 'This is a read-only operation'. It adds useful behavioral context beyond annotations by explaining the return JSON structure, including tokenInfo with a truncated flag, and the difference between markdown and json output formats.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured with clear sections (Main purpose, Args, Returns, Examples, Note) and front-loads the core purpose. It is slightly verbose due to examples and return format details, but every part serves a purpose and no information is redundant.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description fully covers the tool's role and output. With an output schema present, it still explains both JSON and Markdown return formats, includes token truncation behavior, and gives concrete example queries. It also mentions docType filters, which connects to sibling search tools, making it contextually complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% coverage for all three parameters with descriptions and defaults. The description restates the parameters but adds minimal new insight—mainly the implication that 'compact' mode yields a brief list. Since the schema already explains the parameters well, the description does not need to compensate significantly.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states 'List all available Jamf products, topics, and their documentation versions' with a specific verb and resource. It clearly differentiates from sibling tools like jamf_docs_search, which searches rather than lists. The scope is explicit, listing examples like Jamf Pro and Jamf School.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Provides clear context and examples for when to use the tool: 'What Jamf products are available?' and 'What topics can I filter by?'. However, it does not explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use it, leaving room for a more direct comparison with sibling tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
jamf_docs_searchSearch Jamf DocumentationARead-onlyIdempotent
Search Jamf documentation for articles matching your query.
This tool searches across all Jamf product documentation including Jamf Pro, Jamf School, Jamf Connect, Jamf Protect, Jamf Now, Jamf Safe Internet, and more. Results include article titles, snippets, and direct links.
Args:
query (string, required): Search keywords (2-200 characters)
product (string, optional): Filter by product ID (use jamf_docs_list_products to see all)
topic (string, optional): Filter by topic. Common: enrollment, profiles, policies, packages, scripts, patch, apps, security, filevault, sso, identity-provider, inventory, reports, api, network. See jamf_docs_list_products for the full list of 40 topic IDs.
docType (string, optional): Filter by document type: documentation, release-notes, training, solution-guide, glossary, getting-started
version (string, optional): Filter by version (e.g., "11.5.0", "10.x")
limit (number, optional): Maximum results per page 1-50 (default: 10)
page (number, optional): Page number for pagination 1-100 (default: 1)
maxTokens (number, optional): Maximum tokens in response 100-50000 (default: 5000)
outputMode ('full' | 'compact'): Output detail level (default: 'full'). Use 'compact' for brief, token-efficient output
responseFormat ('markdown' | 'json'): Output format (default: 'markdown')
Returns: For JSON format: { "total": number, "query": string, "results": [...], "tokenInfo": { "tokenCount": number, "truncated": boolean, "maxTokens": number }, "pagination": { "page": number, "pageSize": number, "totalPages": number, "totalItems": number, "hasNext": boolean, "hasPrev": boolean } }
For Markdown format: A formatted list of search results with pagination and token info.
Examples (common query → recommended filters):
"Configure SSO with Okta in Jamf Connect" → query="SSO Okta", product="jamf-connect", topic="sso"
"Set up FileVault encryption" → query="FileVault encryption", product="jamf-pro", topic="filevault"
"Patch macOS apps" → query="patch policy", product="jamf-pro", topic="patch"
"Smart group criteria" → query="smart group criteria", product="jamf-pro", topic="reports"
"Automated Device Enrollment workflow" → query="ADE prestage", product="jamf-pro", topic="enrollment"
"Shared iPad in a classroom" → query="shared iPad classroom", product="jamf-school", topic="education"
"Jamf Protect custom analytic" → query="custom analytic", product="jamf-protect", topic="protect-analytics"
"Jamf Pro REST API authentication" → query="API role bearer token", product="jamf-pro", topic="api"
"Extension attribute scripts" → query="extension attribute script", product="jamf-pro", topic="extension-attributes"
"Paginate through results" → query="policy", page=2
Errors:
"No results found" if search returns empty
"Invalid product ID" if product parameter is not recognized
Note: Results are ranked by relevance. Use filters and pagination to navigate large result sets. Most results carry a mapId + contentId pair; pass both to jamf_docs_get_article to fetch that article directly instead of resolving its URL. The pair is omitted when a result comes from a source that does not resolve one — fall back to the URL in that case.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | No | Page number for pagination (1-100, default: 1) | |
| limit | No | Maximum number of results per page (1-50) | |
| query | Yes | Search keywords to find in Jamf documentation | |
| topic | No | Filter by topic. Common: enrollment, profiles, policies, packages, scripts, patch, apps, security, filevault, sso, identity-provider, inventory, reports, api, network. See jamf_docs_list_products for the full list of 40 topic IDs. | |
| docType | No | Filter by document type: documentation, release-notes, training, solution-guide, glossary, getting-started | |
| product | No | Filter by product: jamf-pro, jamf-school, jamf-connect, jamf-protect, jamf-now, jamf-safe-internet, jamf-insights, jamf-rapididentity, jamf-trust, jamf-routines, self-service-plus, jamf-app-catalog | |
| version | No | Filter by version (e.g., "11.5.0", "10.x") | |
| language | No | Documentation language/locale (default: en-US). Options: en-US, ja-JP, zh-TW, de-DE, es-ES, fr-FR, nl-NL, th-TH | |
| maxTokens | No | Maximum tokens in response (100-50000, default: 5000) | |
| outputMode | No | Output detail level: "full" for detailed output or "compact" for brief output | full |
| responseFormat | No | Output format: "markdown" for human-readable or "json" for machine-readable | markdown |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| page | Yes | |
| limit | No | |
| query | Yes | |
| filters | No | |
| hasMore | Yes | |
| results | Yes | |
| totalPages | Yes | |
| suggestions | No | |
| versionNote | No | |
| totalResults | Yes | |
| relevanceNote | No | |
| paginationNote | No | |
| filterRelaxation | No | |
| truncatedContent | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Beyond the annotations, the description discloses result ranking by relevance, error messages ('No results found', 'Invalid product ID'), the mapId/contentId behavior with fallback to URL, pagination limits, and output modes. This goes well beyond what annotations provide and fully informs the agent of behavioral nuances.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Although long, the description is well-structured into clear sections (intro, Args, Returns, Examples, Errors, Note). Every section serves a purpose and is front-loaded with the core purpose. There is no redundant or filler content given the tool's complexity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description is highly complete for a search tool with 11 parameters and an output schema. It covers all parameter semantics, return formats, error scenarios, pagination, and cross-references to sibling tools. The presence of an output schema does not diminish the need for the detailed examples and behavioral notes, which are provided.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema already has 100% coverage with descriptions for all 11 parameters. The description adds value by providing concrete query examples, recommended filter combinations, and explaining the mapId/contentId usage for results, which enriches the semantic understanding beyond merely restating schema constraints.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Search' and the resource 'Jamf documentation' with explicit scope across all products. It distinguishes itself from siblings by noting that results carry mapId/contentId to pass to jamf_docs_get_article, and references jamf_docs_list_products for filter options.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear context with example queries and recommended filters, and explicitly mentions alternatives like jamf_docs_get_article for direct article retrieval and jamf_docs_list_products for product IDs. However, it does not explicitly state when NOT to use this tool, though the examples imply typical usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
2 tool updates
v4.3.1- Changed
jamf_docs_get_article3 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / contentLocaleAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - added
Output schema / properties / navigationAdded value: +{ + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "childCount": { + "type": "number" + }, + "children": { + "items": { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "title": { + "type": "string" + }, + "url": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "title", + "url" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "parent": { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "title": { + "type": "string" + }, + "url": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "title", + "url" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "self": { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "title": { + "type": "string" + }, + "url": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "title", + "url" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "siblingCount": { + "type": "number" + }, + "siblings": { + "items": { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "title": { + "type": "string" + }, + "url": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "title", + "url" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + } + }, + "required": [ + "self", + "siblings", + "children", + "siblingCount", + "childCount" + ], + "type": "object" +} - added
Output schema / properties / versionStatusAdded value: +{ + "enum": [ + "latest", + "superseded" + ], + "type": "string" +}
- Changed
jamf_docs_get_toc2 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / entries / items / properties / depthAdded value: +{ + "maximum": 9007199254740991, + "minimum": 0, + "type": "integer" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / entries / items / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "title", - "url" -]New value: +[ + "title", + "url", + "depth" +]
6 tool updates
v4.0.6- Changed
jamf_docs_batch_get_articles2 fields changed- changed
Input schema / $schemaPrevious value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema" - changed
Output schema / $schemaPrevious value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
- Changed
jamf_docs_get_article5 fields changed- changed
Input schema / $schemaPrevious value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema" - changed
Input schema / properties / contentId / patternPrevious value: -"^[a-zA-Z0-9_~\\-]+$"New value: +"^[a-zA-Z0-9_~-]+$" - changed
Input schema / properties / mapId / patternPrevious value: -"^[a-zA-Z0-9_~\\-]+$"New value: +"^[a-zA-Z0-9_~-]+$" - changed
Output schema / $schemaPrevious value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema" - added
Output schema / properties / tokenCountAdded value: +{ + "type": "number" +}
- Changed
jamf_docs_get_toc8 fields changed- changed
Input schema / $schemaPrevious value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema" - changed
Input schema / properties / product / descriptionPrevious value: -"Product ID: jamf-pro, jamf-school, jamf-connect, jamf-protect"New value: +"Product ID: jamf-pro, jamf-school, jamf-connect, jamf-protect, jamf-now, jamf-safe-internet, jamf-insights, jamf-rapididentity, jamf-trust, jamf-routines, self-service-plus, jamf-app-catalog" - changed
Output schema / $schemaPrevious value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema" - added
Output schema / properties / mapIdAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - added
Output schema / properties / paginationNoteAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - added
Output schema / properties / productIdAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - added
Output schema / properties / versionNoteAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "product", - "version", - "totalEntries", - "page", - "totalPages", - "hasMore", - "entries" -]New value: +[ + "product", + "productId", + "version", + "totalEntries", + "page", + "totalPages", + "hasMore", + "entries" +]
- Changed
jamf_docs_glossary_lookup3 fields changed- changed
Input schema / $schemaPrevious value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema" - changed
Input schema / properties / product / descriptionPrevious value: -"Filter by product: jamf-pro, jamf-school, jamf-connect, jamf-protect"New value: +"Filter by product: jamf-pro, jamf-school, jamf-connect, jamf-protect, jamf-now, jamf-safe-internet, jamf-insights, jamf-rapididentity, jamf-trust, jamf-routines, self-service-plus, jamf-app-catalog" - changed
Output schema / $schemaPrevious value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
- Changed
jamf_docs_list_products2 fields changed- changed
Input schema / $schemaPrevious value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema" - changed
Output schema / $schemaPrevious value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
- Changed
jamf_docs_search6 fields changed- changed
Input schema / $schemaPrevious value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema" - changed
Input schema / properties / product / descriptionPrevious value: -"Filter by product: jamf-pro, jamf-school, jamf-connect, jamf-protect"New value: +"Filter by product: jamf-pro, jamf-school, jamf-connect, jamf-protect, jamf-now, jamf-safe-internet, jamf-insights, jamf-rapididentity, jamf-trust, jamf-routines, self-service-plus, jamf-app-catalog" - changed
Output schema / $schemaPrevious value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema" - added
Output schema / properties / filtersAdded value: +{ + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "docType": { + "type": "string" + }, + "language": { + "type": "string" + }, + "product": { + "type": "string" + }, + "topic": { + "type": "string" + }, + "version": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" +} - added
Output schema / properties / limitAdded value: +{ + "type": "number" +} - added
Output schema / properties / paginationNoteAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +}
5 tool updates
v3.0.34- Added
jamf_docs_get_article - Added
jamf_docs_get_toc - Added
jamf_docs_glossary_lookup - Added
jamf_docs_list_products - Added
jamf_docs_search
5 tool updates
v3.0.30- Removed
jamf_docs_get_article - Removed
jamf_docs_get_toc - Removed
jamf_docs_glossary_lookup - Removed
jamf_docs_list_products - Removed
jamf_docs_search
6 tool updates
v3.0.25- First observed
jamf_docs_batch_get_articles - First observed
jamf_docs_get_article - First observed
jamf_docs_get_toc - First observed
jamf_docs_glossary_lookup - First observed
jamf_docs_list_products - First observed
jamf_docs_search
TDQS
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: list products, search articles, retrieve a single article, retrieve a TOC, glossary lookup, and batch retrieval. There is no functional overlap that would confuse an agent.
All tools share the 'jamf_docs_' prefix, and most follow a verb-first pattern (list_products, get_article, get_toc, batch_get_articles). The exception is 'glossary_lookup', which puts the noun before the verb, creating a slight inconsistency.
Six tools is well-scoped for a documentation server, covering core browsing, searching, retrieval, and batch needs. Each tool earns its place without unnecessary bloat.
The surface covers the full documentation workflow: discovering products, exploring TOCs, searching with filters, retrieving individual articles, fetching multiple articles, and looking up glossary terms. No obvious gaps or dead ends.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Search and query nTop's knowledge base and engineering guides from AI applications.
The documentation, as a tool your agent can call: 950+ AI-dev guides. Search + fetch tools.
Versioned documentation registry and semantic search for AI tools and coding assistants.
Provides tools for searching Google Workspace documentation and much more.
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search and fetch documentation content from Adobe Experience League, allowing natural language queries to retrieve Adobe product documentation and articles.-
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with access to Apple's Human Interface Guidelines and technical API documentation across all Apple platforms (iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS, visionOS), enabling unified search of design principles and implementation details.37021MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides access to Apple's official developer documentation, frameworks, APIs, and WWDC session transcripts across all Apple platforms. It enables AI assistants to search technical guides, sample code, and platform compatibility information using natural language queries.188671,370MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI models with direct access to documentation for over 600 technologies from DevDocs.io, including popular languages, frameworks, and tools. It enables comprehensive searching, content retrieval, and offline access via an intelligent local caching system.122-
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/GET-Technology-Inc/jamf-docs-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server