edubase_patch_organization

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds no behavioral context beyond what the annotations already provide. It does not explain patch semantics, whether fields are partially updated or replaced, permission requirements, or what happens to existing data. There is no contradiction with the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence with no redundant words, making it structurally concise. However, it is under-specified and essentially repeats the tool name, so it does not provide enough substance to score higher.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With three parameters, a nested custom object, no output schema, and a large set of sibling tools, 'Update organization.' is not sufficient context. An agent receives no information about return behavior, partial-update semantics, or when this tool is the appropriate choice.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with title, custom, and organization all documented in the input schema. The description itself adds no parameter-level detail, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Update') and resource ('organization'), clearly indicating the core operation. However, it merely restates the tool name and does not differentiate it from related organization tools such as edubase_post_organization or edubase_patch_organization_webhook.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives like creating a new organization with edubase_post_organization or deleting one with edubase_delete_organization. There is also no mention of prerequisites such as the organization already existing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.