blacklist.remove

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It reveals only that the action is a deletion—a fact already implied by the tool name—and omits critical details such as whether the deletion is permanent, whether confirmation is needed, or what side effects may occur.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short, but this is under-specification rather than effective conciseness. The single phrase adds no value beyond the tool name and contains no structured, front-loaded information that helps an agent use the tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Although an output schema exists and the tool is simple, the description omits essential operational context for a destructive action, such as irreversibility, permissions, or how to identify the rule. An agent cannot safely and correctly invoke the tool based solely on this description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has one required parameter, rule_id, but the description does not mention it at all. With 0% schema description coverage, the description fails to compensate by explaining what rule_id refers to, how to obtain it, or what values are valid.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '删除屏蔽规则' is simply the Chinese translation of the tool name 'blacklist.remove'. It states a verb and resource but is a direct restatement of the name, providing no differentiation from sibling tools like blacklist.add, blacklist.list, or blacklist.test.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention any prerequisite steps such as looking up rule_id via blacklist.list, nor does it indicate conditions under which deletion is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.