Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Trust-scored search engine for MCP servers. 1,900+ sources indexed. IETF draft published. Referenced by OWASP MCP Security Cheat Sheet. L0-L4 trust levels based on cryptographic verification.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 2 tool updates
    • First observedsearch
    • First observedverify

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables users to resolve server names, discover servers via taxonomy, and look up trust ratings for MCP servers through the MCPLookup independent trust layer.
    142
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Behavioral trust scoring for MCP servers and AI agents. Live registry tracking 4,500+ servers with trust scores (0-100) based on interaction history, success rates, and latency
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server exposing AgentForge Trust Score audit tools. Query trust, evaluate policies, list trusted servers, recommend with filter.
    4
    20
    1
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: 'search' queries the index while 'verify' validates specific results. No ambiguity or overlap between retrieval and validation operations.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tools follow an identical simple-verb naming pattern (lowercase single words). The naming convention is perfectly consistent across the minimal set.

Tool Count3/5

With only 2 tools, the surface feels thin for a dedicated 'AgenticSearch' server. While the scope may be narrow, the calibration explicitly flags 1-2 tools as borderline thin for typical use cases.

Completeness3/5

The set covers basic search and verification but lacks obvious domain operations like getting specific agent details by ID, browsing categories, or managing search history. Notable gaps exist for practical agent workflows.

Resources