Zhihuo RotoSpider Layout
Server Details
Rotomolding mold-on-arm layout feasibility: which molds fit on a machine arm/spider, and how.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Available Tools
2 toolscheck_mold_layoutARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Check whether molds fit together on a rotational-molding machine arm.
Every answer comes from the deterministic RotoSpider geometric layout
engine: rotation-envelope and dead-height checks, pairwise mold-to-mold
clearance, offset-arm riser selection, and ring arrangements for 3+
identical molds. It never returns a physically invalid layout.
Args:
molds: List of mold objects. Use one explicit unit convention:
Box/frame mold: {"length_mm": L, "width_mm": W, "height_mm": H}.
Cylinder/tank mold: {"diameter_mm": D, "height_mm": H}.
Exact L, slope, triangle, frustum, or complex mold: measured
length_mm+width_mm+height_mm plus the complete
geometry_asset_id+geometry_asset_revision returned by the
geometry WebAPI or another trusted publisher.
Decimal-inch aliases are length_in, width_in, height_in, and
diameter_in. Each value is converted once to canonical
micrometres; do not give both aliases for the same value.
Optional per mold: "name", "weight_kg", "quantity" (default 1;
use 0 to retain the mold type without requesting a copy).
machine: Public-sample straight-arm preset. Available models are
listed in the tool description. Leave empty AND give no
explicit geometry to scan all presets ("which machine can take
these molds?").
arm_type: 'straight' (dual spiders) or 'offset' (single-spider
offset/L arm). Empty = both.
spider_diameter_mm: Custom machine - spider (mounting plate)
diameter. Giving this plus envelope_diameter_mm switches to
custom-machine mode instead of presets.
envelope_diameter_mm: Custom machine - rotation envelope diameter
(for offset arms: the vertical envelope diameter).
dead_height_mm: Custom straight arm - unusable center height
between the upper and lower spider surfaces.
offset_spider_y_mm: Custom offset arm - spider Y offset from the
spider center to the sphere center (required for custom offset).
offset_horz_diameter_mm: Custom offset arm - horizontal usable
envelope diameter after side trim (defaults to envelope).
riser_heights_mm: Custom offset arm - available riser heights; the
solver picks the best (or none).
*_in: Decimal-inch aliases for the matching custom-arm and
clearance *_mm arguments.
max_load_weight_kg: Optional arm weight capacity; the solver loads
molds only up to this total weight.
clearance_target_mm: Target mold-to-mold clearance (default 300).
clearance_min_mm: Minimum acceptable clearance (default 150).
allow_overhang_within_envelope: Allow every mold shape to extend
past the spider edge while its complete active shape remains
inside the rotation envelope. Defaults to false.
include_layout: Include request-relative mold placements. Use with
response_api v1/v2/v3 to select the placement heading dialect.
display_unit: 'mm' (default) or 'in'. Canonical result fields remain
millimetres; 'in' adds a display projection rounded to 0.00001 in.
response_api: Public placement dialect. Defaults to
rotospider.layout-check.v1; request rotospider.layout-check.v2
for exact four-heading orient keys when layouts are included.
Returns a summary sentence plus per-arm results: feasible, placed vs
requested counts (per mold type when available), selected riser height,
spider utilization, center-of-gravity offset, achieved clearance, and
the engine's reason when molds do not fit.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| molds | Yes | ||
| machine | No | ||
| arm_type | No | ||
| display_unit | No | mm | |
| response_api | No | rotospider.layout-check.v1 | |
| dead_height_in | No | ||
| dead_height_mm | No | ||
| include_layout | No | ||
| clearance_min_in | No | ||
| clearance_min_mm | No | ||
| riser_heights_in | No | ||
| riser_heights_mm | No | ||
| max_load_weight_kg | No | ||
| offset_spider_y_in | No | ||
| offset_spider_y_mm | No | ||
| spider_diameter_in | No | ||
| spider_diameter_mm | No | ||
| clearance_target_in | No | ||
| clearance_target_mm | No | ||
| envelope_diameter_in | No | ||
| envelope_diameter_mm | No | ||
| offset_horz_diameter_in | No | ||
| offset_horz_diameter_mm | No | ||
| allow_overhang_within_envelope | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With readOnlyHint and idempotentHint already present, the bar is lower, yet the description adds substantial behavioral context: it is deterministic, never returns a physically invalid layout, converts inch values once to canonical micrometres, applies defaults such as clearance_target_mm=300 and allow_overhang_within_envelope=false, and explains result units. No contradiction with annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is long but appropriately structured with a purpose statement, an Args section, and a Returns section. It is front-loaded with the core intent. A few sentences are redundant or unfulfilled, notably the claim that machine models are listed, but overall the length is justified for 24 parameters.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity, no output schema, and minimal annotations, the description provides a thorough account of parameters, unit conventions, modes, and return values. It falls short of a 5 because the machine preset names are referenced but not enumerated, and the response_api v1/v2/v3 distinction is only partially explained.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description compensates well by documenting mold object shapes, inch aliases, unit conversion rules, custom-machine mode switches, defaults, and response dialect options. However, the machine parameter says available preset models are listed in the tool description, yet no such list is actually present, leaving a real gap for that parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Check whether molds fit together on a rotational-molding machine arm.' It then names the concrete checks performed (rotation-envelope, dead-height, pairwise clearance, riser selection), which leaves no ambiguity about the tool's function. It is also clearly distinct from the only sibling, send_feedback.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description gives strong usage context: when to scan all presets by leaving machine empty, when custom-machine mode is activated, and how arm_type and response_api affect behavior. It does not explicitly state 'when not to use' or name alternative layout tools, and it claims available machine models are listed but never actually lists them, which is a small guidance gap.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
send_feedbackAInspect
Relay a user question, bug report, or suggestion to the maintainers.
Args:
message: The user's feedback text (required).
contact: Optional reply address the user volunteers.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| contact | No | ||
| message | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations indicate non-readonly, and description confirms it relays feedback. No additional behavioral context (e.g., auth, rate limits) provided.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences plus Args list, efficient and no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Simple tool with two parameters; description covers their purpose adequately. No output schema, but return value is not critical for this action.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage; description adds meaning for both parameters, explaining message is required and contact is optional reply address.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the verb 'relay' and resource 'feedback to maintainers', distinguishing it from the sibling 'check_mold_layout'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly lists when to use (user question, bug report, suggestion) but lacks when-not-to-use or alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- Changed
check_mold_layout1 field changed- added
Input schema / properties / include_layoutAdded value: +{ + "default": false, + "title": "Include Layout", + "type": "boolean" +}
1 tool update
- Changed
check_mold_layout1 field changed- added
Input schema / properties / allow_overhang_within_envelopeAdded value: +{ + "default": false, + "title": "Allow Overhang Within Envelope", + "type": "boolean" +}
1 tool update
- Changed
check_mold_layout1 field changed- added
Input schema / properties / response_apiAdded value: +{ + "default": "rotospider.layout-check.v1", + "title": "Response Api", + "type": "string" +}
1 tool update
- Changed
check_mold_layout31 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / clearance_min_inAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "title": "Clearance Min In" +} - added
Input schema / properties / clearance_min_mm / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - changed
Input schema / properties / clearance_min_mm / defaultPrevious value: -150New value: +null - removed
Input schema / properties / clearance_min_mm / typeRemoved value: -"integer" - added
Input schema / properties / clearance_target_inAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "title": "Clearance Target In" +} - added
Input schema / properties / clearance_target_mm / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - changed
Input schema / properties / clearance_target_mm / defaultPrevious value: -300New value: +null - removed
Input schema / properties / clearance_target_mm / typeRemoved value: -"integer" - added
Input schema / properties / dead_height_inAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "title": "Dead Height In" +} - added
Input schema / properties / dead_height_mm / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - changed
Input schema / properties / dead_height_mm / defaultPrevious value: -0New value: +null - removed
Input schema / properties / dead_height_mm / typeRemoved value: -"integer" - added
Input schema / properties / display_unitAdded value: +{ + "default": "mm", + "title": "Display Unit", + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / envelope_diameter_inAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "title": "Envelope Diameter In" +} - added
Input schema / properties / envelope_diameter_mm / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - changed
Input schema / properties / envelope_diameter_mm / defaultPrevious value: -0New value: +null - removed
Input schema / properties / envelope_diameter_mm / typeRemoved value: -"integer" - added
Input schema / properties / offset_horz_diameter_inAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "title": "Offset Horz Diameter In" +} - added
Input schema / properties / offset_horz_diameter_mm / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - changed
Input schema / properties / offset_horz_diameter_mm / defaultPrevious value: -0New value: +null - removed
Input schema / properties / offset_horz_diameter_mm / typeRemoved value: -"integer" - added
Input schema / properties / offset_spider_y_inAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "title": "Offset Spider Y In" +} - added
Input schema / properties / offset_spider_y_mm / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - changed
Input schema / properties / offset_spider_y_mm / defaultPrevious value: -0New value: +null - removed
Input schema / properties / offset_spider_y_mm / typeRemoved value: -"integer" - added
Input schema / properties / riser_heights_inAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "items": { + "type": "number" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "title": "Riser Heights In" +} - changed
Input schema / properties / riser_heights_mm / anyOfPrevious value: -[ - { - "items": { - "type": "integer" - }, - "type": "array" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } -]New value: +[ + { + "items": { + "type": "number" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - added
Input schema / properties / spider_diameter_inAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "title": "Spider Diameter In" +} - added
Input schema / properties / spider_diameter_mm / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - changed
Input schema / properties / spider_diameter_mm / defaultPrevious value: -0New value: +null - removed
Input schema / properties / spider_diameter_mm / typeRemoved value: -"integer"
2 tool updates
- First observed
check_mold_layout - First observed
send_feedback
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Truck & trailer load planning from a plain-English shipment: what fits, how full, 3D load plan.
11Instant parametric cost estimates for custom manufacturing: CNC, molding, sheet metal, 3DP, PCB.
Plan optimal container & truck loads: 3D layouts, utilization, centre of gravity, crush checks.
Real FEA on CAD parts: validated setups, stress, safety factor, natural frequencies
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenancePlan optimal container & truck loads: 3D layouts, right-size the container mix, and check utilization, centre of gravity, crush protection and securing across 200+ equipment types.16MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables 2D irregular polygon nesting (bin-packing) with tools to design, preview, get reports, and export DXF files for laser cutting or CNC routing.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceCross-OEM industrial machine intelligence. Normalizes telemetry across 16 manufacturer families (Fanuc, Siemens, Haas, DMG Mori, Mazak), enables plain-English operational automation, and produces tamper-evident work records. 14 MCP tools.14-

SmartCutofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceSmartCut is a hosted cutting-optimisation API. It turns a list of parts and available stock into machine-ready cutting patterns for sheet materials (plywood, MDF, glass, plastic, sheet metal), linear stock (timber, bar, pipe, extrusion) and roll goods. Guillotine and true-shape nesting modes, with grain direction, per-part orientation locks, edge banding, blade kerf and stock trim.1-
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
The two tools occupy completely different roles: one performs geometric layout checks, the other collects user feedback. There is no overlap or boundary ambiguity, so an agent cannot confuse which tool to call.
Both tool names follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern with clear imperative verbs and specific object nouns: check_mold_layout and send_feedback. The naming convention is consistent, predictable, and readable.
Two tools is on the low end, and only one is domain-specific; the feedback tool is auxiliary. The single layout engine is rich enough to cover many cases, but the overall surface feels thin for a server with a broader RotoSpider ecosystem.
For a stateless geometric layout checker, the core tool covers preset machines, custom machines, arm types, risers, clearances, weight limits, and layout responses. There are no obvious missing lifecycle operations because layout checking is a calculation rather than a CRUD resource.