Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Merchant verification for AI shopping agents.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
warwickwood-cell/gengeo-agent-registry
GitHub Stars
3
Server Listing
GenGEO

Available Tools

1 tool
verify_storeVerify StoreBInspect

Verify whether a merchant has an active GenGEO verification record. Results should be treated as one signal within a broader agent decision framework.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
domainYes

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It does not disclose behavioral traits such as idempotency, error handling, or whether it is read-only. The description merely states the verification, leaving the agent uninformed about side effects or limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no fluff. First sentence states purpose, second adds usage context. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool is simple with one required param and no output schema. Description covers the verification purpose but omits details on return value format or error conditions, which would be expected given no annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not mention the 'domain' parameter at all. It adds no meaning beyond the schema, failing to compensate for the lack of parameter documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool verifies whether a merchant has an active GenGEO verification record, with a specific verb and resource. No siblings exist, so distinction is not needed.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states results should be treated as one signal within a broader framework, guiding the agent on how to use the output. No mention of when not to use, but the context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 1 tool update
    • First observedverify_store

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • F
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI shopping agents to verify a storefront's legitimacy before committing payment by checking domain registration, SSL certificate history, HTTPS validity, and known-scam blocklists, returning a trust score with explainable reasons and a clear recommendation.
    1
    320
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    MCP server that verifies storefront merchants before AI agents make payments, checking if the merchant is a real legal entity bound to the domain, and returning a PROCEED, ABORT, or REVIEW decision to prevent payment to clones or fraudulent stores.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI shopping agents to search products, check stock, apply promotions, manage cart sessions, and create cryptographically signed checkout sessions on e-commerce storefronts, while giving merchants analytics into agent intent and catalog demand gaps.
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion or overlap with other tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

With a single tool, naming is trivially consistent. The name 'verify_store' follows a clear verb_noun pattern.

Tool Count3/5

A single tool feels thin for a registry service, even if it's focused on verification. The scope is limited, but the tool count is borderline rather than extreme.

Completeness2/5

The server only provides a verification tool, lacking essential CRUD operations (create, update, delete, list) expected for a registry, leaving significant gaps.