htmldrop
Server Details
Publish HTML, Markdown, PDF, or images as instant shareable links with expiry and passwords.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- vin-spiegel/htmldrop
- GitHub Stars
- 13
- Server Listing
- htmldrop
Available Tools
1 toolpublish_htmlAInspect
Publish an HTML or markdown artifact (or fetch a remote HTML page) and get a shareable URL. Markdown is rendered into a clean reader page. Useful for sharing reports, dashboards, visualizations, or any document produced by an agent.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | No | URL of an HTML page to fetch and publish. Provide one of html, markdown, or url. | |
| html | No | HTML content to publish. Provide one of html, markdown, or url. | |
| title | No | Optional page title for the published artifact. | |
| markdown | No | Markdown content to publish; rendered into a styled reader page. Provide one of html, markdown, or url. | |
| password | No | Optional password protection for the artifact. | |
| ttl_days | No | Optional custom TTL in days. Anonymous tier defaults to 7 days. | |
| owner_key | No | Optional owner key for higher limits and ownership. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It mentions that Markdown is 'rendered into a clean reader page' and that publishing yields a 'shareable URL,' but it omits important behaviors such as the default TTL of 7 days for anonymous tier, password protection options, and ownership semantics. The description also does not mention potential side effects or limitations, leaving the agent unaware of constraints like expiration or access control.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences, with the first stating the core function and the second listing use cases. It is front-loaded, using specific terms like 'publish' and 'shareable URL' immediately. There is no fluff or redundant information, making it concise and well-structured.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description covers the primary purpose and output ('get a shareable URL'), and the schema handles parameter details. It does not explain the return structure or the effects of optional fields like ttl_days and password, but given the moderate complexity and absence of an output schema, the description is largely sufficient. However, it could be more complete by mentioning that published artifacts have a default TTL and can be password-protected, which are important operational details.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% parameter description coverage, so the baseline is 3. The description adds minimal parameter-related context beyond the schema, such as clarifying that 'Markdown is rendered into a clean reader page.' However, it does not elaborate on the relationships between parameters (e.g., that html, markdown, and url are mutually exclusive alternatives), which the schema already conveys via the anyOf constraint. The description does not significantly enrich the schema's parameter meanings.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Publish an HTML or markdown artifact (or fetch a remote HTML page) and get a shareable URL.' This is a specific verb+resource combination that unambiguously describes the action and output. Although no siblings are listed, the description is self-sufficient and leaves no doubt about the tool's purpose.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear context for when to use the tool: 'Useful for sharing reports, dashboards, visualizations, or any document produced by an agent.' This indicates appropriate scenarios but does not explicitly mention alternatives or exclusions. Since there are no sibling tools, the absence of explicit alternatives is acceptable, but the description could benefit from stating when not to use it (e.g., for non-publishable content).
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
publish_html
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
- repageOAuthapp.repage
Publish HTML & Markdown to shareable links with versions, comments, and project organization.
Publish self-contained HTML/SVG pages to private, shareable URLs and control who can view them.
Share an HTML page or PDF as a short public link. No account or API key, expires on its own.
Publish HTML, Markdown, and multi-file sites as shareable URLs instantly via MCP.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenancePublishes AI-generated HTML and Markdown to a hosted, shareable URL with versioning, theming, and access control.1MIT

Publee MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI tools to publish HTML pages and get shareable URLs instantly, with optional account features for persistence, in-place updates, and visibility control.1MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenancePublish Markdown or HTML to a clean, shareable public link straight from your AI assistant — OAuth sign-in, no API keys. Tools: publish and list_my_pages.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenancePublish live web pages from AI coding agents. Instant shareable URLs for dashboards, landing pages, and reports with password protection.41MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The single tool's purpose is fully described, and no other tools exist to overlap with it.
The tool name 'publish_html' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, which is consistent and easily understood. Even with only one tool, the name is descriptive and aligns with common naming conventions.
The server has a single tool, which is slightly under the typical 3-15 range, but it is reasonable for a focused service dedicated to publishing HTML/markdown to a URL. The tool consolidates multiple input formats into one action, so the count does not feel unnecessarily limited.
The tool covers the entire publishing workflow described by the server's purpose: accepting HTML, markdown, or a remote URL and returning a shareable URL. There are no obvious missing operations for the stated domain of creating shareable web pages.