Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Anonymous NDA risk analysis for AI agents. $9 per report. No signup, no data retention.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
valtirman/ndasentry-mcp
GitHub Stars
0
Server Listing
NDASentry

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 2 tool updates
    • First observedget_nda_report
    • First observedpreview_nda_risk

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to analyze Ethereum wallets, simulate transactions, and draft transfers with deterministic policy and risk scoring, requiring human approval before on-chain execution.
    2
    ISC
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    URL intelligence for AI agents. One URL in, structured security and data quality signals out across 7 dimensions. 13 tools, risk score 0-100 with 23 configurable weights.
    16
    110
    1
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: preview_nda_risk performs initial screening and returns a partial analysis with a payment link, while get_nda_report retrieves the full report after payment. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case: preview_nda_risk and get_nda_report. This matches the conventional style used in many well-designed MCP servers.

Tool Count4/5

With only two tools, the server is slightly under the typical 3-15 range, but it covers the entire workflow (preview then paid report) without unnecessary additions. The count is reasonable given the narrow domain of NDA risk analysis.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers the full lifecycle of the user journey: preview provides partial analysis and a payment link, and get_nda_report retrieves the comprehensive report. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit cancellation or status-check tool, but the core workflow is complete and functional.