Skip to main content
Glama

json-schema-validator

Server Details

Validates JSON against a JSON Schema, lists violations. x402 payment required (testnet USDC).

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Available Tools

1 tool
json_schema_validatorjson_schema_validatorAInspect

Validates JSON against a JSON Schema, lists violations. x402 payment required (Base mainnet USDC).

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
itemsYesJSON-encoded strings, each an object like {"schema":...,"data":...} to validate
paymentNox402 payment payload (base64 JSON), signed EIP-712 exact/transferWithAuthorization. Omit on the first call — the tool will return payment requirements (accepts[]) as an error result.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It explicitly reveals the x402 payment requirement and the non-obvious first-call behavior that returns accept[] as an error result. This goes beyond a basic description and helps the agent anticipate the tool's behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, each earning its place: the first states the core function, and the second states the critical payment requirement. There is no fluff, and the key information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a low-complexity tool with a well-documented schema, the description covers the essential operational context: what it validates, that it lists violations, and the payment workflow. No output schema exists, so an exact return format would be helpful, but 'lists violations' plus the payment-error behavior provides sufficient guidance for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the input schema already documents both parameters thoroughly. The description adds no additional parameter-level meaning beyond referencing the payment requirement, which is already covered by the schema. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb ('Validates'), a specific resource ('JSON against a JSON Schema'), and the expected outcome ('lists violations'). It fully explains what the tool does in one concise sentence.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides direct guidance on the payment flow: payment is required, and on first call it should be omitted to receive payment requirements. There are no sibling tools, so no alternative selection guidance is needed, but the two-step calling pattern is clearly implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 1 tool update
    • First observedjson_schema_validator

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TSQS

Score is being calculated.

Resources