Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

ip-api.com MCP.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
pipeworx-io/mcp-ip-api
GitHub Stars
0
Server Listing
mcp-ip-api

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 1 tool update
    • Changeddeep_research1 field changed
      • changedInput schema / properties / depth / description
        Previous value: -"How many facets to research in parallel: quick=3 (single hop), standard=5 (default; adds a gap-recovery hop that re-angles unanswered facets + a contradictions[] scan across findings), thorough=8 (paid; adds a full iterative hop that chases leads + recovers gaps, plus the contradictions[] scan)."New value: +"How many facets to research in parallel: quick=3 (single hop), standard=3 (default; adds a gap-recovery hop that re-angles unanswered facets + a contradictions[] scan across findings), thorough=6 (paid; adds a full iterative hop that chases leads + recovers gaps, plus the contradictions[] scan)."

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

The tools are well-separated by domain and purpose, with verbose descriptions that explicitly state when to use each. The ask_pipeworx family (stable, beta, grounded) and the polymarket suite (arbitrage, edges, fill risk, tracker, spread) are clearly differentiated, though an agent could momentarily confuse ask_pipeworx with deep_research or the three ask variants without careful reading. Overall, distinctions are strong.

Naming Consistency3/5

Most tools follow snake_case with domain prefixes (e.g., polymarket_edges, ask_pipeworx_grounded, recent_alerts), but a few deviate like 'ask_pipeworx', 'pipeworx_feedback', and 'pipeworx_trending' which lack underscores. There's also a mix of verb-first (validate_claim, resolve_entity) and noun-first (entity_profile, bet_research) patterns, giving a somewhat inconsistent yet readable convention.

Tool Count2/5

At 31 tools, this exceeds the 25-tool threshold for 'too many' per the calibration. Even for a broad data gateway, many tools overlap in purpose (discover_tools, suggest_questions, ask_pipeworx, deep_research) and could be consolidated. The count feels heavy and could overwhelm agents with redundant options.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface comprehensively covers the server's stated domains: company research (resolve_entity, entity_profile, compare_entities, recent_changes), prediction markets (edge scanning, arbitrage, fill risk), memory (remember/recall/forget), subscriptions (subscribe/unsubscribe/list/alerts), and meta-tools (discover, feedback, trending, suggest_questions). There are no obvious missing operations or dead ends—each workflow appears complete.