smry Public Reader
Server Details
Read and search exact public source URLs with stable paragraph citations.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- mrmps/homebrew-smry
- GitHub Stars
- 0
Available Tools
1 toolread_public_sourceARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Read an exact public article, PDF, or supported YouTube URL as clean source text with stable paragraph citations.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | Exact public HTTP or HTTPS source URL. | |
| query | No | Optional focused question or search phrase for relevance-ranked paragraphs. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, openWorldHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false. The description adds useful behavioral context beyond these: it returns clean text with stable paragraph citations and limits support to articles, PDFs, and certain YouTube URLs.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The entire description is one efficient, front-loaded sentence that states the primary purpose and key output characteristics without redundancy or filler.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple read tool with two parameters and no output schema, the description provides the essential information: URL requirements, supported source types, and output nature. Minor ambiguity remains around what counts as a 'supported' YouTube URL and possible failure behavior, but these are not critical gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both parameters. The description reinforces that the URL must be exact and public, but it does not add significant new parameter-level meaning beyond what the schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description names a specific verb ('Read'), a clear resource ('exact public article, PDF, or supported YouTube URL'), and the output form ('clean source text with stable paragraph citations'). It is unambiguous and would not be confused with a search or listing tool.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description clearly implies this tool is for reading an exact, public, supported URL rather than discovering or searching sources. It does not explicitly list when not to use it or describe alternatives, but with no sibling tools present the context is still clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
read_public_source
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Resolve, search and verify legal citations against the official sources, with provenance.
Citable retrieval across papers, books, patents, Wikipedia, and live social sources.
Federated search of books and papers, BibTeX/RIS citations, open-access retrieval and reading.
Read released episodes, transcripts, citations, clips, reading trails, and flashcards.
Related MCP Servers
FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceVerifiable German, Austrian, Swiss and EU law: resolve citations to the wording in force, verify the citations a model produced against the official source, and walk the citation graph.-- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables revision-bound source audits with exact article fingerprinting, claim-to-source mapping, quotation verification, and immutable JSON evidence reports for prepublication review.9MIT

mentu-navigator-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides read-only, provenance-first repository navigation for agents and humans, with ranked lexical retrieval, exact query, document handles, symbol context, and change impact analysis.107Apache 2.0- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceSearch across a billion+ documents including academic papers, books, code, legal cases, forums, and Wikipedia. Provides search and detail tools for various content types.244MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is zero risk of an agent selecting between overlapping operations. read_public_source is unambiguous because it is the only available action.
The tool name follows a clear verb_noun convention and directly reflects the server's purpose. With a single tool, there are no mixed naming styles or inconsistent patterns to confuse an agent.
One tool is minimal, but it is well-matched to the deliberately narrow purpose of reading public URLs as clean text. The count feels slightly thin in general terms, yet reasonable for a focused reader server.
The tool covers the full stated scope: articles, PDFs, and supported YouTube URLs, returning source text with citations. No additional read-related operations are implied by the server's purpose, so there are no obvious dead ends.