Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Search and read your Laxis meeting transcripts, AI summaries, and participants from Claude.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
OAuth
Requires browser extension
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
laxis-tech/laxis-mcp
GitHub Stars
0
Server Listing
Laxis MCP Server

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 4 tool updates
    • First observedget_meeting
    • First observedget_transcript
    • First observedlist_meetings
    • First observedsearch_meetings

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Integrates local Granola.ai meeting intelligence with Claude Desktop to enable searching and analyzing meeting transcripts, notes, and summaries. Users can perform natural language queries to retrieve meeting details, analyze participant patterns, and access full speaker-identified conversations.
    5
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables searching and browsing of Claude conversation history with hybrid search combining full-text, Spotlight, and optional vector embeddings.
    10
    1
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a distinct purpose: listing meetings, getting details, retrieving transcripts, and searching content. No overlap exists, and descriptions clearly differentiate their use cases.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (get_meeting, get_transcript, list_meetings, search_meetings), making naming predictable and clear.

Tool Count4/5

With 4 tools, the count is on the lower end but still reasonable for a focused retrieval server. It doesn't feel overly sparse given the domain.

Completeness4/5

Core retrieval operations (list, detail, transcript, search) are covered. Missing features like meeting management or participant details are minor gaps for the intended retrieval-focused scope.