Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Hyperliquid - 2 tools for perpetuals, options, and position data

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
junct-bot/hyperliquid-mcp
GitHub Stars
0
Server Listing
Hyperliquid MCP Server

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 2 tool updates
    • First observedexecute_exchange
    • First observedquery_info

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Perpetual futures trading API for AI agents. Access 275+ markets (crypto, stocks, commodities, forex) via Hyperliquid. Copy trading, leaderboard, up to 50x leverage. No KYC. 20% referral commissions.
    40
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Read-only MCP server for the Hyperliquid / HyperEVM ecosystem - yields, protocol TVL, fees, markets, funding history, order-book depth.
    9
    45
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Multi-DEX perpetual futures trading MCP server (Pacifica, Hyperliquid, Lighter). 18 tools for market data, trade execution with dry-run safety, funding rate arbitrage, and portfolio analytics.
    18
    52
    34
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: execute_exchange handles all trading and account operations (actions), while query_info handles all information retrieval (queries). There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool based on the intended operation.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (execute_exchange and query_info), using clear verbs that describe their core functions. The naming is predictable and readable, with no deviations in style or convention.

Tool Count2/5

With only 2 tools, the server feels too thin for its apparent scope, which includes trading, account management, market data, and staking operations. While the tools are unified endpoints, a typical MCP server for such a domain would benefit from more granular tools (e.g., 5-10) to better guide agents and reduce complexity in request handling.

Completeness4/5

The tools cover a wide range of operations through unified endpoints, including CRUD-like actions (place/cancel orders, transfer funds) and comprehensive queries (market, user, account data). Minor gaps might exist in specialized operations not listed, but core workflows for trading and information retrieval are well-supported, allowing agents to work effectively.