Link Preview Cache API
Server Details
Same link preview data as link-preview-api, ~1/3 the price via a shared cache.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- cmondillo/tools
- GitHub Stars
- 0
Available Tools
1 toolpreview_urlAInspect
Fetch Open Graph / meta metadata for a public URL. Costs $0.003 USDC on Base.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the operation is a read-only fetch and explicitly warns about the $0.003 USDC cost on Base, which is a valuable behavioral detail. It does not discuss failure modes or response format, but the core behavior is transparent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two short sentences convey purpose, scope, and cost with no filler. The key information is front-loaded and every word earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple single-parameter tool with no output schema or annotations, the description gives enough to invoke it correctly: what it fetches, from where, and at what cost. It could be slightly more explicit about the return shape or error behavior, but it is not a significant gap.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema only lists a required 'url' string with no description. The tool description compensates by specifying that the URL must be a public URL, adding meaningful semantic constraint beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Fetch') and identifies the exact resource ('Open Graph / meta metadata for a public URL'). This clearly conveys what the tool does and would distinguish it from siblings if any existed.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The phrase 'for a public URL' gives a clear use condition. There are no sibling tools to contrast with, and no exclusions are needed, so the context is sufficiently clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
preview_url
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Pay-per-call Open Graph/link preview metadata for AI agents. $0.01 USDC per call, no signup.
Zero-signup anonymous link-unfurl API. One GET returns clean JSON metadata for any public URL.
Link-preview metadata and clean page-to-Markdown for any public URL. No install.
URL to Markdown or structured JSON (schema.org/OG); renders SPA; batch reads. No signup/key.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceZero-signup link-preview API that returns clean metadata (title, description, image, etc.) from any public URL. No API key required.2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides URL metadata extraction (title, description, image, site name) from OpenGraph and meta tags for link previews.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceURL reality check for AI agents — returns HTTP status, SHA-256 content hash, classification, readability score, title, and wayback-machine fallback when dead, cached 10 minutes at $0.001 per call.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceTurns any URL into structured web intelligence in one call: SEO/OpenGraph metadata, public contacts, tech-stack fingerprinting, Schema.org data, a security-headers audit, and clean AI-ready Markdown. Anti-SSRF hardened by design.5MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The purpose of preview_url is clear.
A single tool cannot establish a pattern, but the name preview_url is a clear verb_noun construction that would fit a consistent naming scheme if more tools were added.
One tool is right at the thin edge of acceptability. For a focused 'preview' action it could work, but the server name implies a broader API surface that a single tool does not fulfill.
The tool fetches metadata but there is no way to manage cached previews, list them, or delete them. The surface is significantly incomplete for a server named 'Link Preview Cache API'.