Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Search otwarteAPI.pl: a catalog of public Polish & EU government/data APIs, for AI agents. Keyless.

Ownership verified
Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
bartosz-kuc/otwarteapi-catalog
GitHub Stars
0

Available Tools

1 tool
szukaj_apiAInspect

Przeszukuje otwarteAPI.pl — katalog 60 oficjalnych, publicznych API rządowych z Polski, UE i kilkudziesięciu krajów (rejestry firm, VAT, statystyka, otwarte dane). Zwraca pasujące wpisy z linkiem do oficjalnej dokumentacji, jurysdykcją, typem autoryzacji i formatem. Puste zapytanie zwraca cały katalog (opcjonalnie zawężony filtrami).

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMaksymalna liczba wyników (1–60, domyślnie 8).
tematNoTag do zawężenia, np. „firmy”, „dane-statystyczne”, „bez-klucza”. Opcjonalne.
zasiegNoKod jurysdykcji do zawężenia, np. PL, EU, DE, GB, US. Opcjonalne.
zapytanieNoZapytanie w naturalnym języku (PL lub EN), np. „sprawdź VAT firmy w Estonii” albo „company register Germany”. Opcjonalne.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavior. It does this well by explaining the search behavior, the exact output fields, and the empty-query behavior (returns entire catalog, optionally filtered). It does not mention potential side effects (likely none) or error handling, but for a read-only catalog search this is adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is composed of three dense, purposeful sentences. The main purpose is front-loaded, followed by output details and edge-case behavior. Every sentence adds value without redundancy, making it concise yet informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Since there is no output schema, the description should ideally explain the return structure more thoroughly. It mentions the key fields of returned entries but does not specify the response format (e.g., JSON array), ordering, pagination beyond the 'limit' parameter, or error behavior. This leaves some gaps, though the tool is simple enough that the description is arguably sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already provides 100% description coverage for all four parameters, so the baseline is 3. The description adds minimal extra meaning beyond the schema, such as mentioning that filters can narrow the empty-query result. It does not elaborate on parameter syntax or provide new context beyond what the schema already states.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's action ('Przeszukuje' – searches) and specific resource (openAPI.pl catalog of official public APIs). It also enumerates the returned fields (link, jurisdiction, auth type, format), making the tool's purpose unambiguous even without sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use the tool (searching for public APIs) and notes that an empty query returns the whole catalog, but it does not explicitly state when to prefer this tool over alternatives or provide exclusions. Since no sibling tools exist, the lack of explicit alternates is understandable, but the guidance is still mostly implicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 1 tool update
    • First observedszukaj_api

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Provides access to Poland's national open data portal (Otwarte Dane) through natural language queries, enabling users to search and retrieve datasets from dane.gov.pl.
    17
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables semantic search and discovery of free public APIs from an extensive catalog. Provides embedding-based search over API names and descriptions, plus detailed API information retrieval.
    2
    9
    MIT
  • F
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables searching and analyzing Polish public procurement tenders from BZP and TED, including filtering, tender details and timelines, offers and contract values, buyer/contractor profiles, CPV code lookup, and regional statistics, with optional AI-summary endpoints.
    12
    1
    -
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of selecting between overlapping tools. The single search operation is self-contained and clearly described.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name 'szukaj_api' follows a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern. With only one name, there are no internal inconsistencies to penalize.

Tool Count4/5

One tool is at the low end, but the server's scope is a read-only search/list interface over a public API catalog; the tool handles empty queries and filters, so it is not thin. A second tool would add little.

Completeness5/5

For its stated purpose—searching and listing entries from an open API directory—the surface is complete: it returns key fields, links, filters, and a full catalog fallback. No create/update/delete operations are relevant to a read-only catalog search.