otwarteAPI
Server Details
Search otwarteAPI.pl: a catalog of public Polish & EU government/data APIs, for AI agents. Keyless.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- bartosz-kuc/otwarteapi-catalog
- GitHub Stars
- 0
Available Tools
1 toolszukaj_apiAInspect
Przeszukuje otwarteAPI.pl — katalog 60 oficjalnych, publicznych API rządowych z Polski, UE i kilkudziesięciu krajów (rejestry firm, VAT, statystyka, otwarte dane). Zwraca pasujące wpisy z linkiem do oficjalnej dokumentacji, jurysdykcją, typem autoryzacji i formatem. Puste zapytanie zwraca cały katalog (opcjonalnie zawężony filtrami).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Maksymalna liczba wyników (1–60, domyślnie 8). | |
| temat | No | Tag do zawężenia, np. „firmy”, „dane-statystyczne”, „bez-klucza”. Opcjonalne. | |
| zasieg | No | Kod jurysdykcji do zawężenia, np. PL, EU, DE, GB, US. Opcjonalne. | |
| zapytanie | No | Zapytanie w naturalnym języku (PL lub EN), np. „sprawdź VAT firmy w Estonii” albo „company register Germany”. Opcjonalne. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavior. It does this well by explaining the search behavior, the exact output fields, and the empty-query behavior (returns entire catalog, optionally filtered). It does not mention potential side effects (likely none) or error handling, but for a read-only catalog search this is adequate.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is composed of three dense, purposeful sentences. The main purpose is front-loaded, followed by output details and edge-case behavior. Every sentence adds value without redundancy, making it concise yet informative.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Since there is no output schema, the description should ideally explain the return structure more thoroughly. It mentions the key fields of returned entries but does not specify the response format (e.g., JSON array), ordering, pagination beyond the 'limit' parameter, or error behavior. This leaves some gaps, though the tool is simple enough that the description is arguably sufficient.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema already provides 100% description coverage for all four parameters, so the baseline is 3. The description adds minimal extra meaning beyond the schema, such as mentioning that filters can narrow the empty-query result. It does not elaborate on parameter syntax or provide new context beyond what the schema already states.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's action ('Przeszukuje' – searches) and specific resource (openAPI.pl catalog of official public APIs). It also enumerates the returned fields (link, jurisdiction, auth type, format), making the tool's purpose unambiguous even without sibling tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies when to use the tool (searching for public APIs) and notes that an empty query returns the whole catalog, but it does not explicitly state when to prefer this tool over alternatives or provide exclusions. Since no sibling tools exist, the lack of explicit alternates is understandable, but the guidance is still mostly implicit.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
szukaj_api
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Verified Polish open data for AI agents: debt, budget, 460 MPs, votings, judiciary search, RAG.
Discover, compare, and monitor 1,400+ APIs directly from your AI coding agent.
140+ data APIs for agents: finance, banking validation, geo, weather, text. One API key.
Public Data Ukraine Mcp connects AI agents to real public APIs via MCP. Tools include
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceKeyless directory of 2,500+ public APIs and their OpenAPI specs, enabling AI agents to discover and interact with APIs.19MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides access to Poland's national open data portal (Otwarte Dane) through natural language queries, enabling users to search and retrieve datasets from dane.gov.pl.17MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables semantic search and discovery of free public APIs from an extensive catalog. Provides embedding-based search over API names and descriptions, plus detailed API information retrieval.29MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching and analyzing Polish public procurement tenders from BZP and TED, including filtering, tender details and timelines, offers and contract values, buyer/contractor profiles, CPV code lookup, and regional statistics, with optional AI-summary endpoints.121-
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of selecting between overlapping tools. The single search operation is self-contained and clearly described.
The single tool name 'szukaj_api' follows a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern. With only one name, there are no internal inconsistencies to penalize.
One tool is at the low end, but the server's scope is a read-only search/list interface over a public API catalog; the tool handles empty queries and filters, so it is not thin. A second tool would add little.
For its stated purpose—searching and listing entries from an open API directory—the surface is complete: it returns key fields, links, filters, and a full catalog fallback. No create/update/delete operations are relevant to a read-only catalog search.