Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

DeFi safety layer for AI agents: wallet safety, token risk, tx decode/simulate. 20 tools.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
acarchidi/agentforge
GitHub Stars
0

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 4 tool updates
    • Addedsolana_program_lookup
    • Addedsolana_token_risk_scan
    • Addedsolana_tx_explain
    • Addedsolana_tx_simulate
  2. 16 tool updates
    • First observedapproval_scan
    • First observedcode_review
    • First observedcontract_docs
    • First observedcontract_monitor
    • First observedgas_oracle
    • First observedpool_snapshot
    • First observedregistry_lookup
    • First observedsentiment
    • First observedsummarize
    • First observedtoken_compare
    • First observedtoken_intel
    • First observedtoken_research
    • First observedtoken_risk_metrics
    • First observedtranslate
    • First observedtx_decode
    • First observedwallet_safety

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to perform complex crypto operations like cross-chain routing, contract decoding, portfolio management, and anti-rug security checks, returning unsigned transactions for safe signing by the agent.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Security layer for AI agents that evaluates transaction intents and returns verdicts (ALLOW/WARN/DENY) using deterministic rules, on-chain checks, and simulation.
    11
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a distinct purpose clearly described. Overlapping areas like token research vs risk metrics are differentiated by scope and methodology. No two tools are ambiguous in their intended use.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with a noun prefix (the entity) and a verb/noun suffix indicating action. Examples: approval_scan, token_research, solana_tx_explain. The naming makes it easy to infer functionality.

Tool Count3/5

With 20 tools, the server is on the heavy side for a typical MCP server. While the tools cover needed functionality for crypto analysis, the inclusion of general-purpose tools (summarize, translate) adds breadth that may not be essential.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers core blockchain analysis scenarios: token research, contract review, wallet safety, transaction decoding, and DeFi monitoring. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no NFT support), but the surface is largely complete for security-focused analysis.