Skip to main content
Glama

Delivery Confirmation Stylebook

Server Details

Set confirmation style for a delivery workflow

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 1 tool update
    • First observedadvise_confirmation_style

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to request user feedback and confirmation to prevent speculative tool calls and reduce resource usage. It streamlines task completion by consolidating multiple potential steps into a single, feedback-aware process.
    1
    5
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables software delivery as a sequence of named, gated workflow steps, from discovery and planning through build, review, and handoff, with verifiable gates and resumable state outside the chat.
    9
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables voice-controlled, confirmed actions on Android notifications via a bridge to Convex. Exposes eleven tools with no immediate-send operation, requiring explicit confirmation for reply, dismiss, and snooze.
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A provider-neutral MCP human approval gateway that requires explicit confirmation before executing write operations, supporting adapters like Fastmail and WhatsApp.
    1
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no risk of confusion or overlapping purposes. The single tool is clearly defined.

Naming Consistency5/5

The tool follows a consistent verb_noun pattern ('advise_confirmation_style'), which is clear and predictable.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool feels too limited for a stylebook server. Even a minimal stylebook would likely need multiple tools for viewing, listing, or resetting styles.

Completeness1/5

The server only provides a setter for confirmation style, with no getter, lister, or update/delete functionality. This is severely incomplete for the stated purpose.

Resources