Skip to main content
Glama

Artifact Delivery Desk

Server Details

Register an artifact delivery route

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 1 tool update
    • First observedrecord_export_route

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    A local MCP-controlled artifact shelf for agents to publish generated content with stable preview URLs. Provides a shared SQLite registry and HTTP gallery for human browsing.
    3
    15
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A local, agent-to-agent artifact exchange for LLM workflows. Enables MCP-capable tools like Claude, Codex, and Gemini to publish, list, read, update, and continue from artifacts without copying content through chat.
    15
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables local file exchange between users and CLI agents via a web UI and MCP server, allowing agents to read/uploads and deliver artifacts without copy-paste.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    The artifact store for AI agents. Every output your agents produce — persisted, retrievable, shareable. Across runs, sessions, and tools. Session/agent metadata, content-hash dedup, and expiring share links; available on npm (@artifacta-mcp/mcp) and PyPI (artifacta-mcp).
    8
    1
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility for confusion between tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool uses a clear verb_noun pattern (record_export_route), which is consistent with common MCP naming conventions.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool for an 'Artifact Delivery Desk' server is far too few to handle the typical lifecycle of deliveries, such as listing, updating, or deleting routes.

Completeness1/5

The server only supports recording export routes, missing essential operations like reading, updating, or deleting routes, resulting in severe incompleteness for its domain.

Resources