Skip to main content
Glama

QnEvt Verifiable Randomness MCP

Server Details

Verifiable random decisions, audit sampling, fair selection, and proof verification using QnEvt.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
NanaKabu/QnEvt
GitHub Stars
1

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 7 tool updates
    • First observedqnevt_audit_sample
    • First observedqnevt_fair_select
    • First observedqnevt_get_proof
    • First observedqnevt_list_agent_proofs
    • First observedqnevt_list_public_proofs
    • First observedqnevt_tie_break
    • First observedqnevt_verify_proof

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Post-quantum, tamper-evident receipts for consequential agent actions. Provides tools for auditing, gating decisions, and egress classification with quantum-hardened security.
    7
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to sign decisions with post-quantum cryptographic proofs and maintain secure audit trails for compliance. It provides tools for stamping events, verifying chain integrity, and exporting audit data across industries like finance and healthcare.
    4
    87
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    This server enables decidable, hardware-attested semantic verification of AI outputs using on-chip ballistic walks, providing reproducible receipts that can be recomputed byte-for-byte.
    12
    192
    1
    -
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a distinct purpose: sampling, fair selection, tie-breaking, proof retrieval, listing agent/public proofs, and verification. Even though fair_select and tie_break both involve picking from options, their contexts differ clearly.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow the consistent pattern `qnevt_<verb>_<noun>` with underscores, using descriptive verbs like audit, fair_select, get, list, tie_break, verify.

Tool Count5/5

Seven tools cover the essential operations of generating, listing, retrieving, and verifying randomness proofs without being excessive or insufficient.

Completeness5/5

The toolset covers core lifecycle: random generation (sampling, selection, tie-breaking), proof management (list, get), and verification, with no obvious gaps for a verifiable randomness server.