Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Multi-CI security scanner with a live threat-intel feed of compromised CI components

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
Baneado98/ci-sentinel
GitHub Stars
0
Server Listing
ci-sentinel

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 2 tool updates
    • First observedaudit_ci_security
    • First observeddiff_ci_security

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Boost security in your dev lifecycle via SAST, SCA, Secrets & IaC scanning
    100
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Local-only GitHub Actions and CI maintenance scanner for AI-built apps. Exposes scan, explanation, and fix-planning tools to MCP clients; modifies nothing and makes no outbound requests by default.
    3
    84
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Universal AI security layer for code scanning, PII detection, prompt injection defense, secret detection, dependency auditing, and audit logging.
    27
    3
    Apache 2.0
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

The two tools serve clearly distinct purposes: one performs a single-state security audit, the other compares before/after states for differential analysis. No ambiguity between them.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tool names follow a consistent verb_ci_security pattern (audit_ci_security, diff_ci_security), making the purpose immediately clear and predictable.

Tool Count4/5

With only 2 tools, the set feels slightly minimal, but it efficiently covers the core use cases (audit and diff). A few additional tools (e.g., for configuration) could enhance completeness, but the current count is reasonable for the focused scope.

Completeness5/5

The tool set thoroughly covers the domain of CI/CD security, supporting seven ecosystems, OIDC, and shared libraries. The two tools enable both full audits and differential checks, leaving no obvious gaps for typical use cases.