Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

UK pest, disease, and weed management — symptom diagnosis, IPM, approved products

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
Ansvar-Systems/uk-pest-management-mcp
GitHub Stars
0

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 10 tool updates
    • First observedabout
    • First observedcheck_data_freshness
    • First observedget_approved_products
    • First observedget_ipm_guidance
    • First observedget_pest_details
    • First observedget_treatments
    • First observedidentify_from_symptoms
    • First observedlist_sources
    • First observedsearch_crop_threats
    • First observedsearch_pests

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Tools are generally well-differentiated by function. Minor overlap exists between `get_treatments` and `get_ipm_guidance` (both address control methods), and the three metadata tools (`about`, `check_data_freshness`, `list_sources`) serve related but distinct purposes. The distinction between `search_pests` (name-based) and `identify_from_symptoms` (diagnostic) is clear.

Naming Consistency4/5

Strong adherence to verb_noun convention throughout (`get_pest_details`, `search_crop_threats`, `list_sources`). The outlier `about` breaks the pattern (should be `get_server_info` or similar). `identify_from_symptoms` uses a preposition but remains readable and consistent in style.

Tool Count5/5

Ten tools is ideal for this domain: 3 for data provenance/metadata, 3 for pest discovery/search, and 4 for detailed guidance and treatments. The scope is well-focused on UK agricultural pest reference data without bloat or trivial fragmentation.

Completeness4/5

Excellent coverage of the reference data lifecycle: pest identification (symptom-based and search), crop threat assessment, detailed profiles, treatment options (chemical/biological/cultural), approved products lookup, and IPM strategy guidance. Minor gap: no retrieval of specific product details by ID, only search.