Skip to main content
Glama

HumanMirror Oracle

Server Details

Structured analysis API and remote MCP tool for text, JSON records and numeric series.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Available Tools

1 tool
humanmirror_oracleAInspect

Use HumanMirror Oracle when an application or AI agent needs structured analysis of text, JSON objects, record arrays, or numeric series: data-quality checks, trends, anomalies, summaries, and recommendations. Do not use it as a substitute for professional advice in high-impact decisions. One successful call consumes 1 Oracle credit.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
inputYesText, JSON object, array of records, or numeric series to analyze.
contextNoOptional context that helps interpret the input.
objectiveNoOptional analysis objective, for example: detect anomalies, check data quality, identify trends, or summarize structure.

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
okYes
errorNo
usageNo
resultNo
versionYes
request_idYes

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide read-only/destructive/idempotent hints. The description goes beyond them by disclosing that one successful call consumes 1 Oracle credit and by adding a high-impact advisory limitation. It does not detail determinism or failure behavior, but the annotations lower the burden and the added cost/limitation context is valuable.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with no filler. It front-loads the core use case, then adds the critical limitation and credit cost, making every sentence informative and structurally efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the output schema exists and all parameters are documented, the description covers selection and invocation needs: input shapes, analysis types, usage boundary, and cost. It does not explain how to phrase objectives or context in depth, but the schema already provides examples and the description is otherwise complete enough for correct use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so input, context, and objective are already documented in the schema. The description restates input types and lists analysis objectives that are nearly identical to the schema's examples, adding only minimal new meaning like 'recommendations'. This satisfies the baseline but does not substantially augment the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific capability: structured analysis of text, JSON objects, record arrays, and numeric series, with concrete output types like data-quality checks, trends, anomalies, summaries, and recommendations. This makes the tool's purpose clear and distinct even without siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly states when to use the tool ('when an application or AI agent needs structured analysis') and gives a clear exclusion boundary ('Do not use it as a substitute for professional advice in high-impact decisions'). No sibling tools exist, so additional alternative routing is unnecessary.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 1 tool update
    • First observedhumanmirror_oracle

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    Not graded
    maintenance
    Provides text analysis tools including TF-IDF document search and text profiling (sentiment, readability, keywords) for analyzing text corpora through structured MCP interfaces.
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Provides LIWC-style dictionary scoring of text with deterministic, provenance-first analysis, enabling researchers and AI agents to perform reproducible text analysis via MCP tools.
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Deterministic time-series statistics for AI agents. This MCP server gives any LLM agent unit-tested statistical tools — anomaly detection, changepoint detection, seasonal decomposition, stationarity/trend tests, data-quality audits, baseline forecasts — with schema-validated structured output and no arbitrary code execution.
    17
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of selecting between overlapping tools. The purpose is clearly described, so an agent cannot misselect.

Naming Consistency4/5

The single name 'humanmirror_oracle' is clear, readable snake_case, but no verb_noun pattern can be established from one tool. There is no inconsistency to penalize heavily.

Tool Count2/5

One tool is far too few for the advertised breadth: text, JSON objects, record arrays, numeric series, quality checks, trends, anomalies, summaries, and recommendations. The broad scope suggests several specialized tools or clear modes would be more appropriate.

Completeness4/5

The single tool claims to cover all the analysis operations listed, so there are no obvious missing analysis functions. However, it is an opaque all-in-one endpoint with no finer-grained surface, which limits granular completeness.

Resources