productschema
Server Details
Audit a store's product page and get the JSON-LD Product markup it is missing. No account.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Available Tools
1 toolaudit_product_pageAudit a store page for AI shopping readabilityARead-onlyInspect
Checks whether an online store can be read and cited by AI shopping assistants, and returns a ready-to-paste JSON-LD Product snippet built from what is actually on the page. Measures: which AI crawlers robots.txt lets in, whether the page renders without JavaScript, which Product fields (price, availability, GTIN, rating, returns, shipping) are present in structured data, title/meta, and sitemap reachability. Everything reported is derived from bytes fetched live — no estimates. Give it a storefront domain or a direct product URL; a product page gives the most useful result.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | Store domain or product URL, e.g. "example.com" or "https://example.com/products/thing". |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description goes beyond the annotations by stating that the results are 'derived from bytes fetched live — no estimates' and enumerates the concrete measures performed (robots.txt, JS rendering, structured data fields, meta, sitemap). It communicates non-mutating behavior and the reliability characteristics of the output. It does not mention rate limits or response size, but for a read-only diagnostic tool this is strong transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Every sentence earns its place: the first sentence states the output and purpose, the second explains the measures, and the last tells the agent what input to provide. The especially thorough list of measured fields is informative but not overly verbose for the including a highly detailed tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given a single required parameter, no output schema, and no sibling tools, the description is sufficiently complete: it states what the tool returns, the scope of checks, the data source (live bytes), and which input maximizes usefulness. The agent has everything it needs to call the tool correctly and interpret the result.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the parameter is already fully documented with type and examples. The description adds useful extra meaning on top of the schema by indicating that product URLs yield the best result, enhancing an already-covered parameter without needing to compensate for a gap.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('checks') and a clear resource (online store pages), then expands on it by naming the deliverable ('ready-to-paste JSON-LD Product snippet'). It differentiates the type of input ('storefront domain or direct product URL') while clarifying that 'a product page gives the most useful result.'
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description gives explicit practical guidance on what to provide ('Give it a storefront domain or a direct product URL') and which input yields the best result. There are no sibling tools to compare against, so it cannot name alternatives, but the usage context is clear and actionable.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
audit_product_page
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Clean product data from any URL. Schema.org + AI extraction. 200 free calls/month.
Validate HTML/CSS, audit SEO and JSON-LD, check links, and capture responsive screenshots.
Scan any URL for on-page, technical & content SEO; 0-100 score with copy-paste fixes.
Rule-based site audits: accessibility, SEO, security headers, performance. Metered per call.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAudit any website for privacy, security, accessibility, and performance issues — with scores, grades, and actionable fix instructions. No account required.313MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAudits any website for SEO issues, providing scored health checks, schema validation, and performance analysis through AI assistants.-

Seonix SEO MCPofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceLets any AI agent audit any website for SEO, GEO/AEO, and speed problems, reporting issues and recommendations without modifying the site.4MIT- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenancePoint your coding agent at a URL and get a real-browser QA audit: broken signup/login/checkout flows, JS console errors, missing analytics, consent + security headers, mobile tap targets, and accessibility — returned as machine-verified findings graded A-F.442Apache 2.0
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion or overlap. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and immediately distinguishable.
With a single tool, naming consistency is trivially strong. The name 'audit_product_page' follows a clear verb_noun convention.
The server has only one tool, but that tool is dense and covers a coherent audit workflow. It feels slightly thin but is still a reasonable scope for a specialized audit tool.
The tool covers all aspects it promises: crawlability, rendering, structured data fields, meta tags, and sitemap presence. It leaves no obvious gap for its stated audit purpose.