Hum Internet Availability
Server Details
Check internet providers, plans, speeds, and known pricing at a specific U.S. street address.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Available Tools
1 toolcheck_availabilityCheck internet availabilityARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Resolve a U.S. street address or apartment and return internet providers and ISPs, including broadband, fiber, and cable plans, speeds, and known pricing. Start with address. Pass lookupId alone to resume processing. Continue clarification with candidateId alone, or candidateId with unit when requested.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| unit | No | Apartment, suite, or unit requested by a unit clarification. | |
| address | No | An imperfect natural-language U.S. service address. | |
| lookupId | No | Opaque ID returned by a previous processing result. | |
| candidateId | No | Opaque ID returned by a previous clarification result. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| error | No | |
| status | Yes | |
| message | No | |
| coverage | No | |
| lookupId | No | |
| warnings | Yes | |
| providers | No | |
| candidates | No | |
| requiredField | No | |
| schemaVersion | Yes | |
| clarificationType | No | |
| normalizedAddress | No | |
| retryAfterSeconds | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already establish read-only, idempotent, non-destructive behavior. The description adds meaningful workflow transparency by revealing that processing is resumable via lookupId and that candidate/unit clarification may be required. It does not cover failure or error behavior, but the annotations reduce the need for that detail.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is three sentences with no filler. The core purpose is front-loaded, and the workflow instructions are compact and easy to parse. Every sentence contributes necessary information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The output schema already covers return values, and the annotations cover safety and idempotency. The description covers the invocation sequence and clarification flow, including important 'alone' qualifiers. Together, the structured metadata and description are sufficient for an agent to call this tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds value by tying each parameter to a workflow stage: address starts the process, lookupId resumes it, candidateId continues clarification, and unit refines candidate clarification. This is more semantically useful than the schema descriptions alone.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a concrete verb and resource: 'Resolve a U.S. street address or apartment and return internet providers and ISPs...' It also names the specific outputs—broadband, fiber, cable plans, speeds, and pricing—so the tool's purpose is unmistakable. Even with no sibling tools, an agent can tell exactly what this tool does.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description gives an explicit invocation workflow: 'Start with address,' 'Pass lookupId alone to resume processing,' and 'Continue clarification with candidateId alone, or candidateId with unit when requested.' This tells the agent exactly which parameter to use at each stage and which combinations are appropriate.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
check_availability
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
US telecom availability and intelligence by address, with FCC provenance. Fiber-first.
Flood, wildfire, earthquake, and coastal-storm hazard lookup for a US property.
Broadband availability, providers, speeds, and BEAD classification from the FCC
US address intelligence: 120M+ addresses, verify, suggest, reverse geocode, coverage stats.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceGiven a U.S. street address, returns the people who represent it (U.S. Senators, House member, Governor, and state legislators) using free public data, with no API keys required for federal officials.5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceQuery ARCEP eligibility API to check fixed-line and mobile telecom eligibilities for a given address in France.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAssesses natural hazard exposure (flood, wildfire, earthquake, coastal proximity) for a single US property address using only free, keyless public data.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAccess FCC broadband availability, coverage analysis, and digital divide data for US geographies and census blocks via MCP.2701Apache 2.0
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools. The single tool is unambiguously the sole entry point for availability checks.
The single tool uses a consistent verb_noun snake_case convention (check_availability), which is clear and self-descriptive. With only one tool, there are no naming conflicts or stylistic inconsistencies.
At one tool, the surface is thin and falls at the borderline end of the expected tool count range. However, the narrow purpose of checking internet availability makes this minimal count acceptable, even though it feels slightly under-scoped.
The tool covers the full availability workflow—address resolution, candidate disambiguation, unit clarification, and provider/plan details—so there are no apparent dead ends or missing operations for the stated purpose.