nameresolver
Server Details
NameResolver: The ViewCaller API empowers developers with powerful phone number intelligence and.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Available Tools
1 toolget_api_v1_searchSearchDInspect
Search Billing per call: 1 Credits.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| code | No | ||
| number | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full responsibility for disclosing behavior. The only behavioral hint is '1 Credits' per call, which might indicate a cost, but it is not explained and does not cover side effects, permissions, or return behavior. The description provides almost no meaningful transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely short (one sentence), which is concise, but it under-specifies the tool. The sentence 'Search Billing per call: 1 Credits.' does not earn its place because it provides minimal value and leaves critical information unresolved. It reads more like an incomplete note than a helpful description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple structure with 2 optional parameters and no output schema, a well‑written description could easily be complete. However, this one fails to explain what the tool does, what parameters mean, or what results to expect. The lack of annotations and output schema increases the burden, which the description does not meet.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0% — the description does not mention 'code' or 'number' at all. Since the parameters have no commentary and are optional, the agent is left without any semantic understanding of what these parameters represent or how to use them. The description fails to compensate for the schema's lack of detail.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description is vague: 'Search Billing per call: 1 Credits.' It states the verb 'Search' and mentions 'Billing' but does not clarify what entity or data is being searched, nor what the search returns. Without sibling tools, it fails to distinguish itself. It is not a pure tautology but is too ambiguous to convey a clear purpose.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There is no guidance about when to use this tool, what scenarios it is appropriate for, or any alternatives. The description does not mention any conditions or exclusions. Since no sibling tools exist, it still lacks any usage context, making the agent unable to decide when to invoke it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
get_api_v1_search
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
ViewCaller: Find any phone number, have more information about your contacts & much more. Phone.
Eyecon: Use the no.1 API for a true caller ID to identify name and see photos. 100% success rate.
Brand-name intelligence across 5 dimensions including AI findability. Pay-per-call via x402.
Phone carrier lookup, append, verification, DNC, and fraud data services.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables phone number lookup through the Truecaller Data2 API, allowing users to search and retrieve information about phone numbers for identification and verification purposes.61MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables phone number intelligence and spam-risk detection by combining metadata, FTC complaint history, and IPQS reputation into explainable risk scores with confidence levels.1-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceTells your agent whether a number is safe to call or text right now. Live US/Canada phone data: carrier, line type, LRN, CNAM, spam/scam reputation, SMS deliverability, and TCPA 8am–9pm calling-window verdicts, plus bulk jobs. Every query is a fresh network dip, never stale cache. Free sandbox key, no card required. Pay per lookup, no minimums.6MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides North American (NANP) area code and phone number intelligence for AI agents, including area code lookup, phone validation, carrier info, city/state coverage, local time, and scam context.858MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap. The purpose of searching is clearly singular.
The name `get_api_v1_search` follows a pattern but mixes HTTP verb with API endpoint structure. It is somewhat readable but not a typical verb_noun pattern, yet not chaotic.
A single tool is extremely thin for a server that presumably aims to handle name resolution. The scope is too narrow to be useful for any real agent workflow.
With only a search operation and no details on what is being searched, the surface is severely limited. There are likely missing operations for retrieving details, creating, updating, or deleting names.