googlesearch-api
Server Details
GoogleSearch API: Fetch real-time Google Search results including title, links Ideal for serp api.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Available Tools
1 toolget_search/search/DInspect
/search/ Billing per call: 1 Credits.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| q | No | Parameter defines the query you want to search. You can use anything that you would use in a regular Google search. e.g. inurl:, site:, intitle:. We also support advanced search query parameters such as as_dt and as_eq. See the full list of supported advanced search query parameters. | |
| gl | No | Parameter defines the country to use for the Google search. It's a two-letter country code. (e.g., US for the United States, UK for United Kingdom, or FR for France). Head to the Google countries page for a full list of supported Google countries. | |
| hl | No | Parameter defines the language to use for the Google search. It's a two-letter language code. (e.g., en for English, es for Spanish, or fr for French). Head to the Google languages page for a full list of supported Google languages. | |
| lr | No | Parameter defines one or multiple languages to limit the search to. It uses lang_{two-letter language code} to specify languages and | |
| start | No | Parameter defines the result offset. It skips the given number of results. It's used for pagination. (e.g., 0 (default) is the first page of results, 10 is the 2nd page of results, 20 is the 3rd page of results, etc.). Google Local Results only accepts multiples of 20(e.g. 20 for the second page results, 40 for the third page results, etc.) as the start value. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations were provided, and the description gives no behavioral details such as side effects, rate limits, or authentication requirements. It only mentions billing per call, which is minimal and unhelpful.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely under-specified, not truly concise. A single fragment with billing info does not constitute concise communication of purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description does not explain what the tool does, what it returns, or any context needed for usage. It is almost entirely unhelpful for an agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool description itself adds no parameter information, but the schema has detailed parameter descriptions with 100% coverage. Since schema coverage is high, this meets the baseline of 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description is only '/search/ Billing per call: 1 Credits.' It does not state what the tool does with a specific verb and resource. It merely restates the title and billing, providing no clarity on functionality.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description contains no context for appropriate usage scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
get_search
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Scrape Google search results with SERP data, ads, and knowledge panels
Search Google straight from your AI agent. Web results, images, videos, news, products, scholarly ar
1 Google Search endpoints. Pay per call in USDC via x402.
Google SERP as JSON: organic, AI Overview, People Also Ask, AI Mode, news, shopping. No Cloud setup.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides real-time Google search results (organic + knowledge graph) with country targeting, language, time filters, and pagination, at low cost.117MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables free web searching using Google search results without the need for API keys or authentication. It returns structured data including titles, URLs, and descriptions with configurable result limits.43MIT

OpenSERP Cloudofficial
AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceSearch API for AI, SEO & automation. Browser-rendered Google, Bing, Yandex, Baidu, DuckDuckGo and Ecosia results with URL extraction (+image search and engine metadata tools)9602MIT- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables free web searching using Google search results with no API keys required, returning structured results with titles, URLs, and descriptions.1435MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
Only one tool exists, so there is no ambiguity between tools. However, the tool's purpose is singular and clear, so disambiguation is not a concern.
The single tool name 'get_search' follows a verb_noun pattern, which is consistent. With only one tool, naming consistency is trivially satisfied, but the pattern is reasonable.
A single tool for a search API feels extremely thin. Even a basic search API would typically offer multiple search types, pagination, or result filtering, so the count is too low for the apparent scope.
The tool surface is severely incomplete. A search API would need options for different search types, pagination, result limits, and possibly language or region parameters. With only a single generic 'get_search' tool, agents will likely hit dead ends.