bypass-cloudflare-api
Server Details
Bypass Cloudflare API: A powerful scraping API designed to bypass Cloudflare protection.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Available Tools
1 toolpost_get_page_sourceGet page sourceBInspect
Fetches and returns page source of provided url. Billing per call: 1 Credits.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the behavioral disclosure burden. It discloses the billing cost ('Billing per call: 1 Credits') and the core behavior of fetching and returning page source. It does not mention potential errors, redirects, authentication requirements, or response format, but for a simple read-style tool this is acceptable though not rich.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two short sentences: one for the tool's function and one for billing. Every word earns its place, with no fluff or redundancy. It is appropriately sized for a single-parameter tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity—one parameter, no output schema, no nested objects—the description is mostly complete. It states what is fetched and returned, and mentions billing. It could be more complete by describing error behavior or response format, but for this low-complexity tool it is adequate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has one parameter, 'url', with an example but no description, and schema description coverage is 0%. The description only repeats 'provided url' without adding meaningful detail about URL format, encoding, or constraints. Since the description must compensate for low schema coverage and does not, the score is low.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Fetches and returns page source of provided url.' This is a specific verb+resource pairing. However, with no sibling tools listed, it cannot distinguish itself from alternatives, so it does not earn a 5.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage: call this tool when you need the page source for a given URL. It does not provide explicit when-to-use vs. when-not-to-use guidance or mention alternatives, but the intended use case is reasonably clear from the wording.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
post_get_page_source
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Cloudflare Solver: Scraping API designed to bypass Cloudflare protection.
Crawl, scrape, search the web, and automate browsers at scale with anti-bot bypass.
ScrapeUnblocker: ScrapeUnblocker allows to bypass anti-bot services and scrape the full page source.
The most accurate web access API. Stop getting blocked.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceOpen-source browser automation API with anti-detection for AI agents, web scraping, and automation, providing undetectable Chrome via MCP and REST API with Cloudflare bypass.9MIT

sessemi-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to scrape websites protected by Cloudflare, DataDome, and Akamai, bypassing anti-bot measures to retrieve page content.2MIT- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables web scraping, structured data extraction, and screenshot capture with automatic anti-bot bypass, supporting JavaScript rendering, proxy rotation, and tiered pricing.252181MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform undetectable browser automation that bypasses Cloudflare, antibots, and social media blocks. Provides 105 tools for element extraction, network debugging, and real-world web scraping with a 98.7% success rate on protected sites.1,883MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of misselection or overlap with other tools. The tool's purpose is clearly stated.
With a single tool, every naming convention applies consistently. The verb_noun pattern (`post_get_page_source`) is clear and unambiguous.
A single-tool server is borderline in scope. It may be adequate if the server's whole purpose is simply fetching page source, but the broader server name suggests additional operations are possible.
The tool fully covers its stated purpose of fetching and returning page source for a URL. No obvious missing operations exist for the described functionality.