best-keyword-research-api
Server Details
Best Keyword Research API: This Keyword Tool API Find millions of keyword suggestions for your SEO..
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Available Tools
1 toolget_keyword_researchKeyword ResearchCInspect
Find millions of keyword suggestions for your SEO. Enter a topic and get your list of best keywords for you Billing per call: 1 Credits.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| country | No | ||
| keyword | No | ||
| languagecode | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It mentions billing ('Billing per call: 1 Credits') and implies a list output, but it does not clarify response structure, rate limits, authentication needs, data source, or limitations. This is insufficient disclosure for a tool with zero annotation support.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is short and front-loaded with the core purpose. However, the sentence 'list of best keywords for you Billing per call: 1 Credits' has a grammar/punctuation flaw and awkwardly merges billing into the main sentence, reducing structural polish.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
There is no output schema, no annotations, and no coverage for three parameters. The description explains the general use case and one input concept, but it omits critical details about country/language behavior, return format, and edge cases, making it incomplete for effective tool invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It loosely equates the 'keyword' parameter with a 'topic,' but it does not explain the 'country' or 'languagecode' parameters at all. Only partial meaning is added beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's function with 'Find millions of keyword suggestions for your SEO' and 'get your list of best keywords.' This is a specific verb+resource pairing, though the grammar is awkward and it does not distinguish from sibling tools (none provided).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description gives implied usage context ('for your SEO' and 'Enter a topic'), but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives or provide any exclusions or prerequisites. This is usable but not strongly instructive.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
get_keyword_research
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Ahrefs: Ahrefs API: SEO powerhouse featuring keyword research, backlink analysis, and SERP tracking.
Ubersuggest SEO tools: keyword research, competitor analysis, backlinks, site audits and more.
Google Image Search: Fast and Simple Google Images Search API. You can get 100+ search results in.
Image Search: Fast and Simple Image Search API. You can get 100+ search results in one query!.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceGet access to real-time SEO data, including: keyword insights, backlink data, traffic estimates and more. Allow AI tools and Large Language Models (LLMs) to tap into the real-time SEO Review Tools API with natural language commands.8176MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceFree keyword research with live search volume, CPC, competition and 12-month trends.1130MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables professional SEO/SEM research with geolocalized keyword discovery, competitor analysis, and SERP ranking insights using DataForSEO API.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables keyword research across 70 languages without API keys, providing Google Suggest autocomplete, People Also Ask, related searches, Jaccard clustering, and language-specific intent tags via MCP tools.MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. Every (and the only) tool has a clearly distinct purpose by virtue of being unique.
The single tool name 'get_keyword_research' follows a consistent verb_noun pattern. Since there is only one tool, naming consistency is trivially maintained.
The server has only one tool, which feels thin for a general-purpose API. While it is not trivial, the scope is minimal and agents may need more operations to fully utilize the domain.
The server only offers a single 'get' operation, covering the core querying functionality but lacking any supporting operations like pagination, source selection, or result filtering. This makes the surface notably incomplete for a comprehensive keyword research workflow.