Postal Codes
Server Details
Postal code lookup with place names and coordinates for 60+ countries. Via Zippopotam.us.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Available Tools
1 toollookup_postal_codeARead-onlyInspect
Look up a postal code. Returns the places (city, state/region, latitude/longitude) matching the given postal code in the given country. Returns: Matching places with coordinates for the postal code..
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| country | Yes | Two-letter lowercase country code, e.g. us, de, fr. | |
| postalCode | Yes | Postal / ZIP code to look up, e.g. 90210. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the agent knows this is a safe read operation. The description adds value by stating the return type (places with city, state/region, latitude/longitude). It does not disclose edge cases such as no match or multiple matches, but for a simple lookup with annotation coverage, this is acceptable.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is short but contains redundancy: the first sentence says 'Returns the places...' and then a separate 'Returns: Matching places...' repeats similar information. There is also a typo with a double period. It could be condensed to a single clean sentence, so a score of 3 reflects the unnecessary repetition.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
This is a simple tool with two required parameters and no output schema. The description explains the return value (places with coordinates) and the input requirements, which is sufficient for a basic lookup. It could mention behavior on no match or multiple matches, but those are minor and not critical given the tool's simplicity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema provides 100% coverage for both parameters, including a pattern for 'country' and an example for 'postalCode'. The description only restates 'given postal code' and 'given country' without adding new format or semantic details. Baseline 3 is appropriate when the schema does the heavy lifting.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Look up' and the resource 'postal code', and explains the outcome: returns matching places with coordinates in the given country. Since there are no sibling tools, no differentiation is needed. This is a specific, unambiguous purpose.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear context: use this tool to look up a postal code in a given country and receive matching places. It implies the appropriate usage but does not explicitly discuss when not to use it or mention alternatives. However, with no sibling tools, the absence of alternatives is not a gap.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
lookup_postal_code
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Free, keyless postal/ZIP code lookup: place name(s), state/region, and coordinates.
US ZIP code intelligence: demographics, weather, tax, crime, housing, voting, and more.
Zippopotam MCP — wraps Zippopotam.us ZIP/postal code API (free, no auth)
Hungarian postcode lookup + validation - 3,484 codes, sub-10ms lookups, bulk address endpoint.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables ZIP and postal code lookups—resolving codes to city, state, and coordinates for 60+ countries, and fetching all postal codes for a city—via the Zippopotam.us API.12MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceGlobal postal code lookups, validation, and city search for 240+ countries with timezone, admin region, and elevation metadata. Sub-10ms responses at $0.000028/query with 1,000 free queries on signup.41MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that resolves postal/ZIP codes to place names, states, and coordinates using Zippopotam.us. Free, no API key required.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables location intelligence for US ZIP codes, allowing users to search, profile, and compare ZIP codes across various domains like crime, income, schools, and more.-
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap. The tool's purpose is clear and singular.
The single tool follows a clear verb_noun convention ('lookup_postal_code'), which is consistent even though there is no other tool to compare against.
At one tool, the server feels thin for a domain like postal codes, which typically would benefit from additional operations like validation or listing supported countries. However, the singular lookup tool does cover the core function.
The server only supports lookup by postal code and country, but offers no way to list supported countries or validate a code. This is a significant gap for an agent needing to know the valid inputs, so the surface is incomplete.