PDF Kit
Server Details
AI-powered PDF tools: fill forms via natural language
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Available Tools
1 toolbasestation.create_autofill_jobCInspect
Create a PDF form filling job using AI to automatically fill out forms based on natural language instructions.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| formFile | Yes | Base64-encoded PDF file to fill | |
| callbackUrl | No | Optional callback URL for job completion notification | |
| instructions | Yes | Natural language instructions for how to fill the form |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure, but it only states the basic action. It does not reveal that this is job-creation (implying async), likely returns a job ID, or any side effects like queuing or persistence. The phrase 'using AI' is a minimal behavioral trait, but important details such as duration, failure modes, or state are omitted.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that efficiently conveys the primary action. There is no fluff or redundancy, and it is appropriately sized for a simple tool, though it could incorporate more detail without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool has moderate complexity (3 parameters, no output schema, no annotations). The description omits critical contextual information such as return value, asynchronous behavior, or any prerequisites. The lack of output schema means the description should explain what the caller receives, but it does not, leaving the tool under-specified.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has 100% coverage with descriptive parameter text for formFile, callbackUrl, and instructions. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, and the baseline of 3 is appropriate since the schema already documents parameters adequately.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's function: creating a PDF form filling job via AI with natural language instructions. It names a specific verb ('Create') and resource ('PDF form filling job'), and includes the mechanism ('using AI') and input type ('natural language instructions'). It lacks comparison with siblings, but no siblings are provided, so this is acceptable.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is given on when to use this tool vs alternatives, prerequisites, or context. The description only states what it does, leaving the user to infer appropriate usage. There is no mention of exclusions or when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
basestation.create_autofill_job
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
- iFillPDFOAuthcom.ifillpdf
Detect fillable fields in any PDF with AI, scans included, then fill and sign it.
Detect, review and fill existing PDF forms from JSON or Excel; reuse saved templates
Fill existing fillable, flat and scanned PDF forms from structured data; save reusable templates
Turn flat PDFs into fillable forms and fill them from data, documents, or a spreadsheet.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceFill any PDF form with AI agents — ML field detection on scans, visual review loop, reusable templates, and native AcroForm fill via justfill.app.14MIT
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to perform PDF operations like merge, split, compress, convert, encrypt, OCR, and summarize using natural language.9824MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceFormFill MCP — AI-powered web form automation. Fill out any online form by describing what you want. Supports Stripe payments via x402 protocol.3MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceRecognizes HWP/HWPX form structures and fills in AI-generated values while preserving original formatting, enabling natural language interaction with Korean word processor documents.626MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct by default.
The single tool name follows a consistent verb_noun pattern (create_autofill_job), and there are no other tools to create inconsistency. The naming is straightforward and predictable.
A single tool is too few for a server named 'PDF Kit', which implies a broader set of PDF-related functionalities. This feels thin and under-scoped for the apparent domain.
The server name suggests a toolkit for PDF operations, but only one tool for creating autofill jobs is provided. There are significant gaps, such as tools for reading, editing, merging, or converting PDFs, which are typical for PDF toolkits.