Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Zero-value tracer token system that tracks AI agent activity across the internet. Agents earn tokens by submitting threat intelligence traces, with free trust verification (verify_trust) and paid threat intelligence feeds. 8 tools: submit_trace, check_token_balance, mutate_token, get_trace_schema, verify_trust (free) + threat_intelligence_feed, bulk_verify_trust, query_trace_analytics (paid).

Ownership verified
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 8 tool updates
    • First observedbulk_verify_trust
    • First observedcheck_token_balance
    • First observedget_threat_feed
    • First observedget_trace_schema
    • First observedmutate_token
    • First observedquery_trace_analytics
    • First observedsubmit_trace
    • First observedverify_trust

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables detection and analysis of pre-public product launches through web search, content extraction, AI-powered scoring, and automated alerting. Provides comprehensive tools for surfacing stealth startup signals before they trend publicly.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Browse IndustryLens's published competitive-intelligence reports and head-to-head competitor comparisons from any AI agent — real, source-backed data.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI chat clients to perform market research and competitive intelligence by gathering company overviews, competitor lists, product portfolios, pricing snapshots, and recent news via live Tavily search.
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap between verify_trust and bulk_verify_trust, and between get_threat_feed and query_trace_analytics, which could cause confusion. The descriptions help clarify the differences (e.g., batch vs. single verification, raw feed vs. analytics), but the boundaries are not entirely clear at first glance.

Naming Consistency4/5

The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern throughout (e.g., check_token_balance, get_trace_schema, submit_trace), with only minor deviations like mutate_token (which could be more descriptive) and the use of underscores consistently. This makes the tools readable and predictable.

Tool Count5/5

With 8 tools, the count is well-scoped for a trust and trace analytics server. Each tool appears to serve a specific function within the domain, such as verification, token management, trace submission, and analytics, without feeling bloated or insufficient.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers key operations for trust verification, token handling, trace submission, and analytics, with clear workflows. However, there are minor gaps, such as no explicit tools for managing API keys or handling token transfers, which agents might need to work around using existing tools or external methods.

Resources