Skip to main content
Glama

1cent Web Intelligence for AI Agents

Url Content Type

web.url.content_type
Read-onlyIdempotent

Classify MIME type, charset and bounded content length. Use only for public HTTP(S) resources; it does not execute JavaScript or bypass access controls. Pass url as an absolute public HTTP(S) URL. Keep fresh=false to allow cache reuse; set fresh=true only when a new upstream fetch is required.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlYesAbsolute public HTTP or HTTPS URL to inspect. Private, loopback, link-local, metadata-service and otherwise SSRF-sensitive destinations are rejected.
freshNoSet true only when a new upstream fetch is required; false allows the bounded cached result and is cheaper for the origin.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYes
toolYes
qualityNo
url_finalYes
checked_atYes
from_cacheYes
request_idYes
content_hashYes
url_requestedYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate read-only, idempotent, safe behavior. The description adds: 'it does not execute JavaScript or bypass access controls' and explains caching with the fresh parameter, providing additional context beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences. The main purpose is front-loaded, and every sentence adds essential information without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description fully covers the tool's purpose, usage restrictions, parameter behavior, and is complete given the low complexity and presence of output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with each parameter described. The description adds value by clarifying the fresh parameter's default behavior and caching implications, but the schema already covers the basics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Classify MIME type, charset and bounded content length.' It also distinguishes itself from sibling tools by specifying it works only on public HTTP(S) resources and does not execute JavaScript or bypass access controls.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit usage guidelines: 'Use only for public HTTP(S) resources; it does not execute JavaScript or bypass access controls. Pass url as an absolute public HTTP(S) URL. Keep fresh=false to allow cache reuse; set fresh=true only when a new upstream fetch is required.' This covers when to use, when not, and parameter-specific advice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes, but some overlap exists among text extraction tools (url_extract, url_text, url_markdown, url_rag_chunks). Descriptions help differentiate them, so disambiguation is mostly clear.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent prefix (catalog_, demo_, site_, url_) and use lowercase snake_case with descriptive names. Conventions are uniform throughout.

Tool Count5/5

35 tools cover a comprehensive range of URL and site analysis functions without feeling bloated. Each tool serves a specific purpose, and the count is appropriate for the server's scope.

Completeness5/5

The tool set covers all major aspects of URL analysis: health, content, metadata, change detection, site discovery, and security. No obvious gaps for the stated domain.

Resources