create_checkoutStart a secure Stripe Checkout only when the authenticated customer explicitly asks to subscribe to the $149/month AgentMart Growth Pilot. Creates a hosted Checkout session; no charge occurs unless the customer completes Checkout.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Beyond annotations, the description adds meaningful behavioral guarantees: it merely creates a hosted session and does not charge unless the customer completes Checkout. It also flags the security aspect. It contradicts nothing in the annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two focused sentences lead with the action and condition, then clarify the payment behavior. Every clause earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a parameterless action, the description covers purpose, trigger, security, and charge timing. It does not describe the return payload (e.g., Checkout session URL), but no output schema exists and the core invocation guidance is sufficient.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are zero parameters, so the schema carries no semantic burden. The description still clarifies the implicit context (authenticated customer, explicit subscription request) that would otherwise be missing.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description states a specific action ('start a secure Stripe Checkout') with the exact resource ($149/month AgentMart Growth Pilot) and a precise trigger (customer explicitly asks to subscribe). This differentiates it from sibling create_billing_portal and other billing tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description gives a clear condition for use: only when the authenticated customer explicitly asks to subscribe. It does not, however, name sibling alternatives or explain when to use create_billing_portal, quote, or billing_status instead.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Most tools target distinct actions: billing status, checkout creation, execution, usage, and calibration are clearly separated. The main ambiguity is between quote and recommend, which both address procurement/vendor decisions, though their descriptions clarify different outputs.
Tool names follow no consistent pattern: billing_status and usage are noun phrases, create_billing_portal and create_checkout use verb_object, while execute, quote, recommend, and calibrate are bare verbs. The names are readable but stylistically mixed.
Eight tools is a well-scoped count for a procurement-focused server covering both web-extraction operations and subscription billing. Each tool maps to a distinct functional need without redundancy.
The extraction procurement lifecycle is well covered with quote, calibrate, execute, usage, and recommend, and billing has status, checkout, and portal access. The main gap is no explicit cancel/update subscription tool, though the billing portal likely covers that indirectly.