Skip to main content
Glama

session_list

Read-only

List live browser sessions with idle age and the time left before auto-eviction. Use to discover a session to reuse instead of creating a new one; sessions expire after 8 min idle.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only declare readOnlyHint=true, so the description adds meaningful behavior: sessions are live, include idle age, have an auto-eviction timer, and the idle timeout is 8 minutes. This goes beyond the annotation and helps the agent understand the tool's read-only discovery nature.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two compact sentences with no filler. The core function is front-loaded, and the usage guidance and expiration policy are conveyed efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a parameterless listing tool with no output schema, the description is complete: it names what will be returned (live sessions with idle age and time before eviction), explains the intended use case, and provides the key operational detail (8-minute idle expiry). An agent can call this tool correctly with no further information.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4 per the rubric. The description doesn't need to explain parameter meaning since there are none, and it doesn't introduce confusion about inputs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific action verb ('List') with a clear resource ('live browser sessions') and specifies the returned details (idle age, time before auto-eviction). It distinguishes itself from siblings like session_state and session_create by scoping to a collection-level discovery operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states when to use the tool ('to discover a session to reuse instead of creating a new one') and gives a concrete behavioral context (sessions expire after 8 min idle). This clearly routes the agent away from session_create and toward this listing tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes, but there's overlap between session_click/click and session_eval/eval. Descriptions clarify that session_* tools operate on persistent sessions while the others are one-off, so ambiguity is low.

Naming Consistency4/5

The session_* prefix is consistently used for session-related tools (17 of 23), while the remaining tools (cache, click, download, eval, fetch, search) are single-word lowercase verbs. This is a clear pattern, though not strictly verb_noun.

Tool Count4/5

23 tools is above the typical 3-15 range but reasonable for a browser automation server that needs both one-off and session-based operations. The count is justified by the breadth of features, though it's slightly heavy.

Completeness5/5

The surface covers all major browser automation needs: navigation, clicking, typing, scrolling, screenshot, state inspection, console/network logs, cookies/storage management, JavaScript eval, waiting, and even session export. No obvious gaps for the stated purpose.