Verify a notarisation by job_id. Returns status (pending/anchored/error). If anchored, returns the full PDR record (base64, 239 bytes) with Ed25519 signature verification. Step 4 of the notarisation flow: quote -> pay -> notarize -> verify. Can be polled repeatedly until status changes from 'pending' to 'anchored'.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| job_id | Yes |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses polling behavior, return types (status, PDR record with size and signature algorithm), and that the status transitions from pending to anchored. Could mention idempotency or rate limits, but good overall.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Three sentences, front-loaded with the action, no redundant information. Every sentence adds value.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The presence of an output schema reduces the need to describe return values in detail. The description covers status transitions, PDR record content, and signature verification. Could elaborate on error conditions, but overall complete for the tool's simplicity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There is only one parameter (job_id) with 0% schema coverage. The description mentions 'by job_id' but does not explain what it is or where to obtain it. For a single required param, this is adequate but not excellent.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it verifies a notarisation by job_id, lists return statuses and what happens when anchored. It explicitly places itself as step 4 of the flow, distinguishing it from sibling tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explains it is step 4 of the flow (quote -> pay -> notarize -> verify) and that it can be polled until status changes. It does not explicitly mention when not to use it, but the context is clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool serves a distinct purpose: free notarization, paid NEAR notarization, quote generation, verification, and a USDC discovery tool that is explicitly marked as non-callable. There is no ambiguity between the tools.
All tools follow a consistent 'notary_' prefix with descriptive lowercase verbs (free, notarize, notarize_paid, quote, verify). The pattern is uniform and predictable.
With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for a notarization service. It covers the essential steps (free, quote, paid notarize, verify) without unnecessary bloat.
The toolset covers the core workflow: free PDR creation, paid NEAR notarization, and verification. However, the USDC-paid notarization tool is marked as discovery-only and cannot be used via MCP, leaving a minor gap in the paid options.