Skip to main content
Glama

Valet

by io.github.valetdotdev

List the connector catalog

list_catalog_connectors
Read-onlyIdempotent

List the connectors Valet curates — the catalog an organization creates a connector from. Reach for it when list_attachable_connectors returned nothing that serves the data a page needs: the organization has no connector for it yet, and this says whether Valet has an entry for the product and what setting it up would take.

Each entry says how its credential arrives. An entry that takes a secret names each slot it asks for and what the slot is. An entry that authorizes in a browser, or connects through Composio, says so — a person completes those on the dashboard's Integrations page, and no answer here can stand in for that.

Each entry also says whether a website's pages could call it. That is a marker, not a filter: an entry only an agent's container can run is still listed, because "Valet has your product, but no page can call it" is a real answer and reporting it as missing is not. Requires connecting a Valet account.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
org_nameNoThe Valet organization a connector would be created in. The catalog is the same for every organization; this names the one the answer points the next step at. Omit to use the organization the account joined first.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false. The description adds behavioral context: entries describe credential arrival (secret slots, browser auth, Composio), and includes a marker nuance about page-callable entries. It also mentions the requirement of a connected Valet account. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three paragraphs of moderate length, but each paragraph serves a distinct purpose: purpose/guidelines, entry content, and a nuance about markers. It is front-loaded with the core action. Slightly verbose but still concise for the information conveyed.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has one optional parameter, no output schema, and 16 siblings, the description covers purpose, usage guidance, entry content, and a prerequisite (connected account). It explains the return format sufficiently to guide an agent, though it does not enumerate all possible fields. Adequate for the complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents the single parameter. The description adds value by explaining that omitting 'org_name' uses the account's first organization, which is not in the schema description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it lists the connectors Valet curates (the catalog). It uses a specific verb ('list') and resource ('catalog connectors'), and distinguishes itself from the sibling tool 'list_attachable_connectors' by explaining when to use it instead.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says 'Reach for it when list_attachable_connectors returned nothing that serves the data a page needs' – this is direct guidance on when to use this tool vs. an alternative. It also implies when not to use it (if list_attachable_connectors already yields results).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Valet toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Every tool targets a distinct resource and action. The three list_* connector tools are clearly separated by scope (catalog vs attachable vs attached), and the site management tools are unambiguous.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a uniform verb_noun snake_case pattern. Each name directly states the action and object, with no mixed conventions or vague verbs.

Tool Count4/5

16 tools is slightly above the typical well-scoped range, but the set covers two clear domains—site publishing and connector management—and each tool has a distinct role. The count is justified, if a bit heavy.

Completeness4/5

Site lifecycle is well covered: publish, list, get, rename, delete, access, and share. The connector lifecycle covers create, attach, detach, and call, but lacks delete/update connector operations, which are a minor gap.

Resources