Explains how to start using Strale and what is available without credentials. Call this on first connection. Returns the current free-tier capability list with example inputs, the pay-per-call (x402) route that needs no signup, and how to reach the full registry. No API key required.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations available, the description carries the full burden. It discloses that no API key is required, what the tool returns (free-tier capability list, x402 route, full registry info), and the expected first-connection behavior. This is good coverage for a no-input, read-only onboarding tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is three sentences and front-loaded with the core purpose. Every sentence adds value: what it does, when to call it, what it returns, and that no API key is required. No redundant or filler content.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
This is a simple, zero-parameter onboarding tool with no output schema. The description fully covers the purpose, invocation timing, return contents, and authentication requirement, making it complete for its intended use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so schema coverage is 100% by default. The description appropriately focuses on behavior rather than parameter syntax, and the baseline of 4 is appropriate since no parameter explanation is needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Explains how to start using Strale') and clearly defines the resource and scope ('what is available without credentials'). It distinguishes itself from siblings by focusing on first-connection onboarding, free-tier capabilities, and the no-signup x402 route.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explicitly states 'Call this on first connection,' which provides clear usage context. It does not mention exclusions or alternatives, but for a getting-started tool this is sufficient and unambiguous.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool addresses a distinct function: balance checks, capability execution, onboarding, methodology docs, connectivity, registry search, transaction history, trust profiling, and on-chain assurance. There is no overlap or ambiguity between tool purposes.
All tools follow the consistent pattern of a 'strale_' prefix with lowercase snake_case names (e.g., strale_balance, strale_getting_started). The naming is uniform and predictable across the entire set.
With 9 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of exposing core interactions with a 290+ capability API. It avoids bloat while providing all necessary operations without being too sparse.
The tool surface covers the full lifecycle: discovery (strale_search), execution (strale_execute), financial management (strale_balance), audit (strale_transaction), trust evaluation (strale_trust_profile), specialized on-chain checks (strale_web3_assurance), plus support functions (getting_started, ping, methodology). No obvious gaps exist.
