Skip to main content
Glama

get_context

START HERE. Global market snapshot: top edges (mispriced contracts), price movers, highlights, traditional markets — live exchange data updated every 15 min. With thesisId + apiKey: thesis-specific context including causal tree, edges with orderbook depth, evaluation history, and track record. Global context is free-tier and rate-limited; API keys unlock higher limits.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
apiKeyNoSimpleFunctions API key. Required only for thesis-specific context. Get one at https://simplefunctions.dev/dashboard/keys or run: sf login
thesisIdNoThesis ID. Omit for global market snapshot on the free tier.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / thesisId / description
      Previous value: -"Thesis ID. Omit for global market snapshot (no auth needed)."New value: +"Thesis ID. Omit for global market snapshot on the free tier."
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It discloses that data is live exchange data updated every 15 minutes, that the global context is rate-limited, and that API keys unlock higher limits. It also enumerates the delivered content. However, it does not explicitly state whether the operation is read-only (though 'snapshot' implies it) or describe possible error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, each serving a distinct function: positioning ('START HERE'), content overview, and conditional usage. No filler or redundant phrasing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only snapshot tool with no output schema, the description covers the main contents, both modes, and rate-limit behavior. It does not specify response structure, but given the broad nature of the tool, the description is sufficiently complete for an initial selection decision.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema already documents both parameters (100% coverage). The description adds essential semantics: it explains that thesisId + apiKey together produce thesis-specific context, while omitting them yields the global snapshot on the free tier. This clarifies the dependency between parameters beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it provides a global market snapshot with specific content categories (top edges, price movers, highlights, traditional markets) and optionally thesis-specific context. The 'START HERE' prefix distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_edges or get_highlights.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly positions the tool as the starting point ('START HERE') and clarifies when to use the global free tier vs thesis-specific mode (with thesisId + apiKey). It also notes rate limits and that API keys unlock higher limits, guiding usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

C2.8/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

Many tools have overlapping purposes, such as multiple market query tools (scan_markets, screen_markets, get_market_detail, get_market_diff, get_market_history, inspect_ticker) and legislative tools (legislation, get_legislation, list_legislation, query_gov). Aliases like get_heartbeat_config/get_heartbeat_status and explore_public/explore_theses add further confusion. An agent would struggle to select the correct tool without deeply reading each description.

Naming Consistency3/5

Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (get_, list_, create_, update_), but there are notable deviations: 'legislation' lacks the 'get_' prefix, 'stt' and 'tts' are acronyms, 'monitor_the_situation' is a full phrase, and 'x_account/x_news/x_volume' use a non-standard prefix. The overall style is readable, but the mixed conventions reduce predictability.

Tool Count1/5

108 tools is extreme for any server, even one covering prediction markets, trading, portfolio management, forum, skills, and speech. The massive surface area overwhelms agents and makes the server feel more like a platform than a coherent toolkit. This many tools inevitably leads to redundancy and maintenance burden.

Completeness4/5

The server covers an impressively broad domain: market data, thesis management, intents, strategies, positions, portfolio, forum, skills, legislative and economic queries, and audio/visual processing. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no delete for skills/theses, no update for some portfolio items) but core workflows are well-supported. Overall lifecycle coverage for most entities is strong.

Resources