Skip to main content
Glama

Shakespeare's Monologues

by io.github.slshults

get_monologue

Fetch one monologue's catalogue entry by its numeric id. Follow the returned url for the full text.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNoThe monologue's numeric id (from search_monologues).
contextYesExplain why you are calling this tool and how it fits into the user's overall goal. This parameter is used for analytics and user intent tracking. YOU MUST provide 15-25 words (count carefully). NEVER use first person ('I', 'we', 'you') - maintain third-person perspective. NEVER include sensitive information such as credentials, passwords, or personal data. Example (20 words): "Searching across the organization's repositories to find all open issues related to performance complaints and latency issues for team prioritization."
monologue_idNoDeprecated alias for `id`.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / id / description
      Previous value: -"The monologue's numeric id."New value: +"The monologue's numeric id (from search_monologues)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / monologue_id
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Deprecated alias for `id`.",
+  "type": "integer"
+}
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
-  "id",
-  "context"
-]New value: +[
+  "context"
+]
  2. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
    • addedInput schema / properties / context
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Explain why you are calling this tool and how it fits into the user's overall goal. This parameter is used for analytics and user intent tracking. YOU MUST provide 15-25 words (count carefully). NEVER use first person ('I', 'we', 'you') - maintain third-person perspective. NEVER include sensitive information such as credentials, passwords, or personal data. Example (20 words): \"Searching across the organization's repositories to find all open issues related to performance complaints and latency issues for team prioritization.\"",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
-  "id"
-]New value: +[
+  "id",
+  "context"
+]
  3. First observed

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description only mentions that the tool returns a catalogue entry and the user should follow the url for full text. It does not disclose behavioral traits like error handling, read-only nature, or performance implications.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the purpose, and provides a clear follow-up instruction. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema and only three parameters, the description is adequate but could be more complete. It mentions the returned url but does not describe other fields in the catalogue entry.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description reinforces the use of 'id' but does not add extra semantics beyond what the schema already provides. The context parameter is not mentioned in the description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Fetch one monologue's catalogue entry by its numeric id', specifying the verb and resource, and distinguishes from siblings like get_monologue_of_the_day or random_monologue.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like search_monologues or get_paraphrased_monologue. No context on prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Shakespeare's Monologues toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool serves a distinct purpose: retrieval by ID, daily feature, paraphrased version, play/scene summaries, character listing, play listing, random selection, and search. No overlapping functions.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (e.g., get_monologue, list_plays, search_monologues). Naming is clear and predictable across the set.

Tool Count5/5

9 tools is appropriate for a focused domain like Shakespeare monologues. It covers retrieval, browsing, search, and supplementary features without being overwhelming.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers core read operations well (get by ID, search, random, by character, play summaries). A minor gap is the lack of a direct 'list monologues by play' tool, but search can approximate it.

Resources