Skip to main content
Glama

Ilostat

by io.github.pipeworx-io

Scan Dependency

scan_dependency
Read-onlyIdempotent

Composite "should I add this npm package to my project" check in ONE call — fans out across deps.dev (license + advisories + version history) and bundlephobia (gzipped/minified bundle size, dependency count, ESM/tree-shake support). Use whenever an agent asks "is X safe / popular / small" or "what does adding lodash cost me". Returns a summary block (is_latest, license, published_at, advisory_count, bundle_kb_min, bundle_kb_gz, dependency_count, has_esm, tree_shakeable), per-advisory detail, links, and a list of recent alternative versions. NPM ecosystem only in v1; PyPI / Maven / Cargo / Go fall under deps.dev:version directly. Partial failures degrade gracefully — bundlephobia's first measurement on a new version can take 5-30s; sources_failed will list it if it times out, the rest still returns.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
packageYesnpm package name. Scoped packages (e.g. "@types/node") are accepted.
versionNoSpecific version to check (e.g., "18.3.1"). Defaults to the latest published version when omitted.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, openWorldHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint false, so the tool is safe and idempotent. The description adds valuable behavioral context: partial failures degrade gracefully, bundlephobia first measurement can take 5-30s, sources_failed list if timed out, and specific return fields are detailed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single paragraph but is front-loaded with the core purpose. It is dense with information and efficiently covers ecosystem scope, usage, edge cases, and return details. Could be slightly more structured with bullet points, but it remains effective and concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (two external services, partial failure handling, ecosystem limitation, specific return fields), the description is thorough. It explains the composite nature, the services used, the return blocks (summary, advisories, links, alternatives), and the graceful degradation. No output schema exists, so the description adequately covers return values.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with both 'package' and 'version' already well described in the schema. The description adds minor value by mentioning scoped packages as an example for 'package' and reiterating the default behavior for 'version', but does not significantly enhance semantics beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: a composite check for npm packages across deps.dev and bundlephobia to answer questions about safety, popularity, and size. It distinguishes from siblings by explicitly noting the NPM ecosystem limitation and directing other ecosystems to deps.dev:version.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit usage guidance is provided: 'Use whenever an agent asks "is X safe / popular / small" or "what does adding lodash cost me".' It also clarifies what is not covered (PyPI, Maven, etc.) and where to go for those, offering clear alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Ilostat toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

The server mixes three near-identical ask_pipeworx variants (stable, beta, grounded) where beta is currently described as functionally identical to stable, plus several overlapping discovery and research tools (discover_tools, suggest_questions, deep_research, validate_claim, ask_pipeworx). Multiple entity/comparison/change tools (entity_profile, compare_entities, recent_changes) and several Polymarket tools further blur boundaries, requiring careful reading of long descriptions to pick correctly.

Naming Consistency3/5

Many tools follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_dataflows, get_data, compare_entities, validate_claim, resolve_entity), and the polymarket_* prefix groups the prediction-market family consistently. However, naming is mixed: bare verbs (remember, forget, recall), noun phrases (dataflow_structure, entity_profile), brand-prefixed tools (pipeworx_feedback, pipeworx_trending), and inconsistent verb choices like ask_pipeworx vs ask_pipeworx_grounded vs suggest_questions.

Tool Count2/5

34 tools is heavy for a server named Ilostat, especially since only three tools (list_dataflows, dataflow_structure, get_data) actually serve ILOSTAT data. The rest form a broad general-purpose data/prediction-market platform that appears bolted on rather than scoped to the server's stated identity.

Completeness4/5

For the ILOSTAT domain specifically, the read-only lifecycle is complete: list_dataflows discovers datasets, dataflow_structure explains dimensions/codes, and get_data retrieves observations — no obvious dead ends for public data access. Other embedded subsystems (memory, subscriptions) also have full CRUD, though the overall server lacks a coherent single-domain surface to judge against.

Resources