Skip to main content
Glama

Easypost Rates

easypost_rates
Read-onlyIdempotent

Get shipping rate quotes from <from_zip> to <to_zip> for a parcel — returns multi-carrier rates (USPS, UPS, FedEx, etc.) with price, service level, and estimated delivery days. Example: easypost_rates({ from_zip: "94105", to_zip: "10001", weight_oz: 16, _apiKey: "your-key" })

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
to_zipYesDestination postal/ZIP code, e.g. "10001"
_apiKeyYesEasyPost API key (get one free at easypost.com)
to_cityNoDestination city (optional), e.g. "New York"
from_zipYesOrigin postal/ZIP code, e.g. "94105"
to_stateNoDestination state/province code (optional), e.g. "NY"
width_inNoParcel width in inches (optional)
height_inNoParcel height in inches (optional)
length_inNoParcel length in inches (optional)
weight_ozYesParcel weight in ounces, e.g. 16 for 1 lb
to_countryNoDestination ISO country code (default "US")
from_countryNoOrigin ISO country code (default "US")

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "_apiKey": "your-easypost-api-key",
      +    "from_zip": "94105",
      +    "to_zip": "10001",
      +    "weight_oz": 16
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "_apiKey": "your-easypost-api-key",
      +    "from_zip": "90210",
      +    "height_in": 6,
      +    "length_in": 12,
      +    "to_city": "Chicago",
      +    "to_state": "IL",
      +    "to_zip": "60611",
      +    "weight_oz": 32,
      +    "width_in": 8
      +  }
      +]
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, openWorldHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false. The description adds an example but does not disclose additional behavioral traits like API key authentication or rate limits beyond what the schema provides. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences: one explains functionality, one provides example. No wasted words, front-loaded with purpose. Perfectly concise for the complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Parameters fully documented in schema, description explains output (multi-carrier rates with price, service, delivery days). Lacks explanation of error cases (e.g., invalid zip) but this is acceptable given low tool complexity and rich schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear parameter descriptions. The description adds value by providing a concrete usage example showing how parameters combine (e.g., from_zip, to_zip, weight_oz, _apiKey), which aids understanding beyond the schema alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it 'Get shipping rate quotes' with specific source/destination and parcel, and lists return fields (multi-carrier rates, price, service level, delivery days). This distinguishes it from sibling easypost_track (tracking) and provides a concrete verb+resource.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for rate quotes but does not explicitly state when to use over alternatives like easypost_track. No 'when-not' or prerequisite guidance is provided; the context is implicit via the example.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

The ask_pipeworx family (stable, beta, grounded) are nearly identical, with beta explicitly matching stable, creating clear misselection risk. The five polymarket_* tools and several research tools (deep_research, bet_research, entity_profile) also overlap in purpose despite detailed descriptions.

Naming Consistency3/5

Tool names are mostly snake_case and readable, with consistent prefixes (ask_pipeworx_, polymarket_, easypost_), but mix verb-first (validate_claim, resolve_entity) and noun-first (entity_profile, ai_visibility_check) conventions. The server name 'Easypost' does not align with the overwhelmingly Pipeworx-focused tool set.

Tool Count2/5

33 tools is a heavy count, especially with three near-duplicate ask_pipeworx variants and many meta-tools. The set is also unfocused: only two shipping tools under an 'Easypost' label while the rest are a broad data-research and prediction-market platform, making the count feel bloated for the apparent scope.

Completeness2/5

As an Easypost server, shipping coverage is severely incomplete (rates and tracking only, no label purchase, address verification, or refunds). Within the Pipeworx tools, the cited pipeworx:// URIs have no direct fetch-by-URI tool, leaving a notable dead end for agents trying to retrieve full records.