Skip to main content
Glama

Digimon

by io.github.pipeworx-io

Recent Changes

recent_changes
Read-onlyIdempotent

"What's new with X" / "latest on Y" / "what happened to Z this week / month / quarter" / "updates on Acme" / "news on Tesla recently" / "what's happening with Apple" — change feed for a company in the last N days/weeks/months in ONE parallel call. Fans out to SEC EDGAR (filings since since), GDELT→GNews fallback (news mentions in window — GDELT preferred, GNews when rate-limited or 5xx), USPTO (patents granted; PatentsView API sunset May 2025 so this soft-fails until reactivated). since accepts ISO date ("2026-04-01") or relative shorthand ("7d", "30d", "3m", "1y"). Returns structured changes[] grouped by source + total_changes count + pipeworx:// citation URIs. Use entity_profile instead when you want the static profile (filings + fundamentals + LEI + patents) regardless of window.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
typeYesEntity type. Only "company" supported today.
sinceYesWindow start — ISO date ("2026-04-01") or relative ("7d", "30d", "3m", "1y"). Use "30d" or "1m" for typical monitoring.
valueYesTicker (e.g., "AAPL") or zero-padded CIK (e.g., "0000320193").

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description adds significant behavioral context beyond annotations: fans out to multiple sources, uses fallback logic, soft-fails for patents, accepts date formats, and mentions return structure. Annotations already declare read-only, open-world, idempotent, and non-destructive, which the description reinforces.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is packed with useful information, front-loaded with example queries, and no wasted words. Slightly long but justified by complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (multiple sources, fallback, date handling, no output schema), the description is remarkably complete. It explains the fallback mechanism, patents soft-fail, and explicitly contrasts with sibling `entity_profile`.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description adds value for `since` parameter by explaining ISO and relative formats with examples like '30d' or '1m'. Also clarifies that `value` can be ticker or CIK, which is helpful.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it provides a change feed for a company, using examples like 'latest on Y' and explicitly distinguishes from sibling `entity_profile` by specifying when to use each.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit when-to-use examples (e.g., 'What's new with X') and when-not-to (use `entity_profile` for static profile). Also explains fallback behavior and source-specific notes.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Digimon toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

Multiple tools overlap significantly: the three ask_pipeworx variants (ask_pipeworx, ask_pipeworx_beta, ask_pipeworx_grounded) are near-identical routers, and the six polymarket_* tools plus bet_research cover overlapping prediction-market territory. The server name 'Digimon' adds confusion since almost all tools are unrelated to Digimon, making it hard for an agent to tell what this server is actually for.

Naming Consistency3/5

All names use snake_case, which is consistent, but the pattern is mixed: some tools start with verbs (get_digimon, search_digimon, list_subscriptions, validate_claim), others with nouns (entity_profile, polymarket_arbitrage, pipeworx_trending), and a few are bare verbs (remember, recall, forget). This irregularity makes the naming less predictable than a uniformly verb-first set.

Tool Count2/5

With 33 tools, the server exceeds the 'too many' threshold and feels bloated. The tools span Digimon data, Pipeworx research, Polymarket betting, memory, subscriptions, and even llms.txt generation—an incoherent grab-bag that doesn't form a focused, well-scoped toolkit.

Completeness4/5

For the broad data-research and prediction-market domain implied by the majority of the tools, the surface is impressively comprehensive: universal routing, grounded answers, deep research, entity resolution, company/drug profiles, comparisons, claim validation, memory, subscriptions, discovery, and multiple specialized Polymarket tools. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no direct order execution on Polymarket), but ask_pipeworx routes to thousands of sources, covering most needs.

Resources