Skip to main content
Glama

Data Nola

by io.github.pipeworx-io

Remember

remember
Idempotent

Save data the agent will need to reuse later — across this conversation or across sessions. Use when you discover something worth carrying forward (a resolved ticker, a target address, a user preference, a research subject) so you don't have to look it up again. Stored as a key-value pair scoped by your identifier. Authenticated users get persistent memory; anonymous sessions retain memory for 24 hours. Pair with recall to retrieve later, forget to delete.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
keyYesMemory key (e.g., "subject_property", "target_ticker", "user_preference")
valueYesValue to store (any text — findings, addresses, preferences, notes)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds context beyond annotations: storage mechanism (key-value scoped by identifier), persistence differences (authenticated vs anonymous), and pairing with other tools. No contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four sentences with zero waste: purpose first, then usage guidance, then behavioral details. Efficiently front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Fully explains what the tool does, when to use, how data is stored, and retention policy. No output schema needed for a simple write operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% so baseline is 3; description adds meaningful context by providing example key patterns ('resolved ticker', 'target address') and value types, raising it above baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Save data the agent will need to reuse later' (specific verb+resource) and distinguishes from siblings like recall and forget.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says 'Use when you discover something worth carrying forward' and lists example scenarios; also pairs with recall and forget for retrieval/deletion.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Data Nola toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

Several tools overlap in purpose: ask_pipeworx, ask_pipeworx_beta, ask_pipeworx_grounded, and deep_research all route to the same underlying catalog, and composite tools like entity_profile, recent_changes, compare_entities, and validate_claim draw on similar company-data sources. However, the descriptions are extremely detailed with explicit usage guidance, so an agent can usually pick correctly despite the overlap.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tool names follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern (ask_pipeworx, compare_entities, list_subscriptions, validate_claim), and domain prefixes like nola_, pipeworx_, and polymarket_ help group tools. Minor deviations such as entity_profile, recent_changes, and polymarket_edges are still readable and do not undermine the overall pattern.

Tool Count2/5

At 34 tools, the set spans far beyond the 'Data Nola' name: New Orleans open data, general Pipeworx data research, Polymarket arbitrage, npm dependency scanning, AI visibility, memory, and subscriptions. This breadth makes the surface heavy and forces agents to triage a large and heterogeneous toolset.

Completeness4/5

The broader research platform is well covered: question answering, entity resolution, profiles, comparisons, claim validation, subscriptions, memory, and NOLA dataset querying all have solid lifecycle support. Minor gaps exist—no NOLA dataset metadata or write tools, no Polymarket order execution—but these are acceptable for a read-only data server.

Resources