Skip to main content
Glama

sheetsdata-mcp

by io.github.octoco-ltd

prefetch_datasheets

Read-only

Trigger background datasheet extraction for multiple parts at once (up to 20). Non-blocking — returns immediately with the status of each part. Use this to warm up datasheets for a BOM before calling read_datasheet. Example: prefetch_datasheets(['TPS54302', 'ADS1115', 'LP5907'])

If a part comes back 'no_source' on the first call, retry prefetch for that MPN once after 10-30s — the URL resolver is retriable and often finds a source on the second pass. If still 'no_source', use request_datasheet_upload + confirm_datasheet_upload to attach your own PDF (org-private).

Part numbers must be specific MPNs (e.g. 'STM32F446RCT6', 'TPS54302DDCR') or LCSC numbers (e.g. 'C2837938'). Do NOT pass bare values ('100nF', '10K'), descriptions, BOM reference designators, test points, or board/module names — see the server instructions for the full rule set. When a BOM has values-only rows, use search_parts first to resolve each to an MPN.

DATASHEET STATUS VALUES:

  • 'ready' — extracted and indexed; call read_datasheet, search_datasheets, or analyze_image.

  • 'extracting' / 'in_progress' / 'queued' / 'pending' — extraction running or scheduled. Poll check_extraction_status every 5-10s until 'ready' or 'failed'. Typical time: 30s-2min.

  • 'not_extracted' — known part but datasheet hasn't been fetched yet. Trigger it via prefetch_datasheets (cheapest) or by calling read_datasheet (auto-triggers on first read).

  • 'no_source' — we couldn't find a public datasheet URL for this MPN. First, retry prefetch_datasheets in 10-30s (the URL resolver re-runs and often finds a source on the second pass). If still 'no_source', the agent can upload the PDF manually via request_datasheet_upload + confirm_datasheet_upload (see those tools). Org-uploaded datasheets are private to the org.

  • 'unsupported' — PDF exists but can't be extracted (scanned image-only, encrypted, or corrupted). Upload a clean text-based PDF via request_datasheet_upload to override.

  • 'failed' / 'error' — extraction errored. The response includes the error reason. Retry via prefetch_datasheets or escalate to support.

  • 'rejected' — input wasn't a real MPN (bare value like '100nF', description, or reference designator). Fix the input and re-call.

  • 'deduplicated' — another part in the family already has this datasheet; same content is returned under the primary MPN.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
part_numbersYesList of MPNs to prefetch (max 20). Must be specific manufacturer part numbers, not values or descriptions.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses non-blocking behavior, return statuses, retriability, and failure modes in detail. Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and no destructiveHint, and the description consistently aligns with those while adding operational context (e.g., status meanings and retry timing).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is long but every section earns its place. It is front-loaded with purpose and an example, then systematically organizes status values and retry logic. The structured bullet points make it easy for an agent to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of an output schema, the description fully explains the possible status values and their implications. It covers prerequisites, failure handling, and alternatives, making it complete for an agent to act on.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers the parameter but the description adds substantial meaning: concrete examples ('TPS54302'), allowed formats (MPNs, LCSC numbers), prohibited inputs ('100nF', descriptions, reference designators), and a workflow for resolving BOM values via search_parts.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action: 'Trigger background datasheet extraction for multiple parts at once (up to 20).' It clearly distinguishes this tool from siblings like read_datasheet and check_extraction_status by emphasizing its role as a prefetch/warm-up step.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit when-to-use guidance is given: 'Use this to warm up datasheets for a BOM before calling read_datasheet.' It also provides specific alternatives for failure cases (retry, request_datasheet_upload) and exclusions (do not pass bare values, use search_parts for values-only rows).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All sheetsdata-mcp toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: search_parts finds parts, search_datasheets searches extracted content, read_datasheet reads sections, analyze_image extracts visual data, compare_parts batches comparisons, find_alternative finds substitutes, check_design_fit validates specs, prefetch/check/manage extraction status, and request/confirm handle uploads. The descriptions cross-reference each other to further eliminate ambiguity.

Naming Consistency5/5

All 12 tools follow the verb_noun snake_case pattern consistently (analyze_image, check_design_fit, compare_parts, prefetch_datasheets, request_datasheet_upload, etc.). No mixing of camelCase, verb styles, or vague generic names.

Tool Count5/5

12 tools is ideal for a datasheet-centric server, covering the full workflow from part discovery and datasheet extraction to analysis, validation, comparison, and upload. The count is neither bloated nor thin, and every tool earns its place.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface is comprehensive for the domain: part search, spec-based semantic search, detailed part data, datasheet reading (section/search), image analysis, design-fit checking, part comparison, alternative finding, extraction lifecycle management, and manual datasheet upload (request+confirm). No obvious dead ends or critical missing operations.

Resources