Skip to main content
Glama

getAdditionalInformationOptions

Read-only

List valid values for one of the Additional Information picklists used in updateStayOrganisationalData: Children Allowed, Pets Allowed, or Parking. These are NOT booleans — they're lookup IDs (e.g. 'Yes', 'No', 'On Request') — call this to find the right value before writing petsAllowedId/childrenAllowedId/parkingId. Requires NOMADSTAYS_MCP_AGENT_TOKEN.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
filterNameYesWhich picklist to fetch options for

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnlyHint annotation, the description warns that the values are NOT booleans but lookup IDs, and discloses the required token (NOMADSTAYS_MCP_AGENT_TOKEN). This adds meaningful behavioral context that the agent would not otherwise know.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact (three sentences) and front-loaded with the primary purpose. Every sentence contributes useful information without repetition or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple one-parameter read-only tool and no output schema, the description adequately explains what the tool returns (valid picklist values) with examples. However, it could mention the return format (e.g., array of option objects) to be fully complete, so a slight deduction applies.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already defines the filterName enum (Children Allowed, Pets Allowed, Parking) with 100% coverage. The description merely restates those enum values and does not add deeper parameter semantics, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists valid values for Additional Information picklists (Children Allowed, Pets Allowed, or Parking). It ties the tool to a specific consumer (updateStayOrganisationalData) and names the exact fields it supports, distinguishing it from sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells the agent when to use it: 'call this to find the right value before writing petsAllowedId/childrenAllowedId/parkingId'. This provides a clear use case and context, even if alternatives are not mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, with detailed descriptions differentiating the many getStaysBy* search variants and the four availability tools. However, the overlap between checkStayAvailability, getRoomAvailability, findNearestAvailability, and getAvailabilityByMonth could still cause confusion for an agent, though the descriptions largely mitigate this.

Naming Consistency3/5

The tools mostly follow a verb-noun pattern with get*, update*, create*, and delete* dominating, but the mix of additional verbs (check, find, list, search, signup, book, quote, purchase, submit, save, reorder, upload) and inconsistent noun forms (Stay vs. Stays, MyStay vs. Stay) prevents a fully predictable naming scheme. CamelCase is consistent, but the verb variety is high.

Tool Count1/5

With 76 tools, this server far exceeds the well-scoped range and even the 50+ threshold for extreme mismatch. While the platform covers multiple domains, this many tools is overwhelming for an agent and would likely be better split into focused sub-servers.

Completeness3/5

The tool surface is broad, covering search, stay management, applications, bookings, products, and help center. However, there are notable lifecycle gaps: no cancel booking, no delete stay, no delete application, and no way to update or delete a booking. These missing operations create potential dead ends for common workflows.