Skip to main content
Glama

validate_schedule

Validate a schedule document against provider rules, media limits, account state, and publish times WITHOUT creating any posts. Always run this before apply_schedule.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
scheduleYesSocialClaw schedule document. Minimal shape: { timezone, posts: [{ account, name, description, publish_at, media_link? }] }. Campaign documents use { timezone, campaigns: [...] }. Per-post provider settings go in settings, e.g. TikTok inbox mode: settings: { tiktokPostMode: "draft" } sends the media to TikTok's inbox notification flow instead of publishing, and the creator finishes the post inside the TikTok app.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / schedule / description
      Previous value: -"SocialClaw schedule document. Minimal shape: { timezone, posts: [{ account, name, description, publish_at, media_link? }] }. Campaign documents use { timezone, campaigns: [...] }. Per-post provider settings go in settings, e.g. TikTok drafts: settings: { tiktokPostMode: \"draft\" } uploads the media to the account's TikTok drafts (inbox) instead of publishing, and the creator finishes the post inside the TikTok app."New value: +"SocialClaw schedule document. Minimal shape: { timezone, posts: [{ account, name, description, publish_at, media_link? }] }. Campaign documents use { timezone, campaigns: [...] }. Per-post provider settings go in settings, e.g. TikTok inbox mode: settings: { tiktokPostMode: \"draft\" } sends the media to TikTok's inbox notification flow instead of publishing, and the creator finishes the post inside the TikTok app."
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / schedule / description
      Previous value: -"SocialClaw schedule document. Minimal shape: { timezone, posts: [{ account, name, description, publish_at, media_link? }] }. Campaign documents use { timezone, campaigns: [...] }."New value: +"SocialClaw schedule document. Minimal shape: { timezone, posts: [{ account, name, description, publish_at, media_link? }] }. Campaign documents use { timezone, campaigns: [...] }. Per-post provider settings go in settings, e.g. TikTok drafts: settings: { tiktokPostMode: \"draft\" } uploads the media to the account's TikTok drafts (inbox) instead of publishing, and the creator finishes the post inside the TikTok app."
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden. It effectively discloses the key side-effect boundary by stating 'WITHOUT creating any posts,' which is critical for a validation tool. However, it does not mention what happens on validation failure (e.g., error vs. result object) or whether any state is otherwise modified, leaving some transparency gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with no wasted words. The first sentence states the function and scope; the second gives a clear directive. Information is front-loaded, and the behavioral note ('WITHOUT creating any posts') is effectively embedded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has a complex nested input and no output schema, but the description covers the tool's purpose, non-mutating nature, and when to use it. It does not explain the return value or error behavior, which would improve completeness for a validation tool. However, the provided detail is sufficient for an agent to select and invoke the tool correctly in most cases.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although schema coverage is 100%, the description enriches the single 'schedule' parameter with concrete shapes (minimal and campaign documents) and a specific example of provider settings (TikTok inbox mode). This goes well beyond the raw schema, providing actionable semantics for constructing valid input.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('validate') with a clear resource ('schedule document') and enumerates the validation dimensions (provider rules, media limits, account state, publish times). It also explicitly contrasts with the sibling tool 'apply_schedule' by noting it does not create posts, making the tool's purpose unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit when-to-use guidance: 'Always run this before apply_schedule.' This clearly positions the tool as a pre-flight check for another tool, giving the agent a direct workflow cue. No alternative tools are named, but the directive resolves ambiguity.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but a few are close: delete_instagram_comment vs hide_instagram_comment overlap (though one is preferred), and get_analytics overlaps with Instagram-specific analytics tools. Overall, the boundaries are generally clear, with only minor potential confusion.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_accounts, connect_account, upload_asset, cancel_post). There are no deviations in style or grammar, making the naming highly predictable.

Tool Count2/5

With 31 tools, this exceeds the 25-tool threshold for 'too many'. While the broad multi-provider social media domain justifies some breadth, the sheer number makes the surface heavy and potentially overwhelming, pushing the score down.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers core workflows well: account connection, scheduling/publishing, post management, analytics, Instagram-specific engagement (comments, messages), asset upload, and workspace health/usage. Minor gaps include no explicit disconnect_account or delete_post, but these are edge cases; the domain is largely covered.